Advertisement

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 141–148 | Cite as

Contemporary Directions in Theories and Psychotherapeutic Strategies in Treatment of Personality Disorders: Relation to Level of Personality Functioning

  • Sebastian Simonsen
  • Erik Simonsen
Original Paper

Abstract

In this commentary on treatment strategies for personality disorders, we analyze each of the cases and the problem of low motivation in terms of how they fit with the Level of Personality Functioning scale. We then show how patients vary in terms of both level and breadth of pathology. Three of the articles describe patients who are severely impaired and strategies suggested are understood in terms of working with differentiation. The additional three articles present cases where patients have a higher level of personality functioning, and strategies are seen as interventions aimed at integration and improved adaptation. Based on this finding, we argue that the Level of Personality Functioning could be a useful assessment method for improving treatment selection. Finally, we raise questions and offer considerations regarding the understanding of empathy, low motivation and autobiographical memory in the cases presented.

Keywords

Personality disorders Psychotherapy Mentalization 

References

  1. Alden, L. E., & Trew, J. L. (2013). If it makes you happy: Engaging in kind acts increases positive affect in socially anxious individuals. Emotion, 13, 64–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 713–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateman, A. (2012). Treating borderline personality disorder in clinical practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 560–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2006). Mentalization-based treatment for borderline personality disorder: A practical guide (p. 2006). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bender, D. S. (2013). An ecumenical approach to conceptualizing and studying the core of personality psychopathology: A commentary on Hopwood et al. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 311–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron, A. Y., Reed, K. P., & Gaudiano, B. A. (2014). Addressing treatment motivation in borderline personality disorder: Rationale for incorporating values-based exercises into dialectical behavior therapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9253-9.Google Scholar
  8. Critchfield, K. L., & Benjamin, L. S. (2006). Principles for psychosocial treatment of personality disorder: Summary of the APA Division 12 Task Force/NASPR review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 661–674. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimaggio, G., Nicolò, G., Semerari, A., & Carcione, A. (2013). Investigating the personality disorder psychotherapy process: the roles of symptoms, quality of affects, emotional dysregulation, interpersonal processes, and mentalizing. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 624–632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimaggio, G., Salvatore, G., Fiore, D., Carcione, A., Nicolò, G., & Semerari, A. (2012). General principles for treating the overconstricted personality disorder. Toward operationalizing technique. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 63–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimaggio, G., Semerari, A., Carcione, A., Nicolò, G., & Procacci, M. (2007). Psychotherapy of personality disorders: Metacognition, states of mind and interpersonal cycles. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Dimaggio, G., Valeri, S., Salvatore, G., Popolo, R., Montano, A., & Ottavi, P. (2014). Adopting metacognitive interpersonal therapy to treat Narcissistic Personality Disorder with somatization. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9254-8.Google Scholar
  13. Fivush, R. (2011). The development of autobiographical memory. Annual Reviews, 62, 559–582.Google Scholar
  14. Hopwood, C. J., Malone, J. C., Ansell, E. B., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2011). Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 305–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2013). The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 270–295.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiesler, D. J. (1966). Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 110–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kohut, H. (1990). The role of empathy in psychoanalytic cure. In J.R.Laing (Ed.), Classics in psychoanalytic technique. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  18. Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 464–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kramer, U., Berthoud, L., Keller, S., & Caspar, F. (2014). Motive-oriented psychotherapeutic relationship facing a patient presenting with narcissistic personality disorder: A case study. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9249-5.Google Scholar
  20. Links, P., & Prakash, A. (2014). Strategic issues in the psychotherapy of patients with narcissistic pathology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9258-4.Google Scholar
  21. Luyten, P., Van Houdenhove, B., Lemma, A., Target, M., & Fonagy, P. (2012). A mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of functional somatic disorders. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 26, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meehl, P. E. (1955). Psychotherapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 357–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morken, K., Karterud, S., & Arefjord, N. (2014). Transforming disorganized attachment through mentalization-based treatment. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9246-8.Google Scholar
  24. Pos, A. E. (2014). Emotion focused therapy for avoidant personality disorder: Pragmatic considerations for working with experientially avoidant clients. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. doi: 10.1007/s10879-013-9256-6.Google Scholar
  25. Schulze, L., Dziobek, I., Vater, A., Heekeren, R. H., Bajbouj, M., Renneberg, B., et al. (2013). Gray matter abnormalities in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(10), 1363–1369. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Siegel, D. J. (2001). Toward an interpersonal neurobiology of the developing mind: Attachment relationships, “mindsight”, and neural integration. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simonsen, S., & Simonsen, E. (2009). The Danish DAPP-BQ: Reliability, factor structure and convergence with SCID-II and IIP-C. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 629–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skowron, E., & Friedlander, M. L. (1998). The differentiation of self inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spinhoven, P., Bamelis, L., Molendijk, M., Haringsma, R., & Arntz, A. (2009). Reduced specificity of autobiographical memory in Cluster C personality disorders and the role of depression, worry, and experiential avoidance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 520–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychotherapeutic Centre StolpegaardGentofteDenmark
  2. 2.Psychiatric Research UnitRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations