Journal of Combinatorial Optimization

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 519–546 | Cite as

Research on the impact of green innovation alliance mode on decision-making of two-cycle closed-loop supply chain

  • Chunmei MaEmail author
  • Dan Huang


Based on the previous researches on closed-loop supply chain (CLSC), this paper takes the life cycle attributes of products into consideration and investigates the situation in which the manufacturer has a tendency to invest in green innovation and establish alliance with other supply chain members. In a two-cycle CLSC consisting of one manufacturer, one retailer and one-third party recycler, Stackelberg game method is adopted to analyze and compare the optimal decisions and profits of CLSC members as well as the efficiency of three green innovation alliance modes. The results show that the impact of difference among those three alliance modes on CLSC decision is obvious, and the operational efficiency of CLSC is always higher than that without alliance. From the perspective of consumers, environmental protection and profits, the green innovation alliance formed by manufacturer and retailer enjoys the lowest price, the highest green innovation level, the highest alliance profit and the relatively high level of resource recycling, which is the best choice for manufacturer. Finally, numerical examples are presented to obtain some conclusions and give some management inspirations intuitively. It is found that the coefficient of profit reduction in the second cycle has a significant impact on the decision-making and profits of the members and entire CLSC, but the positive influence of consumers’ sensitivity to the green innovation of manufacturer is not obvious.


Closed-loop supply chain Stackelberg game Green innovation Alliance 



Closed-loop supply chain


Non-alliance mode


Alliance of manufacturer and retailer


Alliance of manufacturer and third party



The research was supported by General Foundation of Chongqing Industry Polytechnic College No. GZY201734-YB.


  1. Alumur SA, Nickel S, Saldanha-da-Gama F, Verter V (2012) Multi-period reverse logistics network design. Eur J Oper Res 220:67–78MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dai R, Zhang JX, Tang WS (2017) Cartelization or cost-sharing? Comparison of cooperation modes in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 156:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gao JH, Han HS, Hou LT, Wang HY (2016) Pricing and effort decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures. J Clean Prod 112:2043–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Genc TS, Giovanni PD (2017) Trade-in and save: a two-period closed-loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns. Int J Prod Econ 183:514–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Genc TS, Giovanni PD (2018) Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability. Int J Prod Econ. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghosh D, Shah J (2012) A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures. Int J Prod Econ 135(2):568–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giovanni PD, Zaccour G (2014) A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 232(1):22–40MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gu XY, Ieromonachou P, Zhou L, Tseng ML (2018) Developing pricing strategy to optimise total profits in an electric vehicle battery closed loop supply chain. J Clean Prod 203:376–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hasanov P, Jaber MY, Tahirov N (2019) Four-level closed loop supply chain with remanufacturing. Appl Math Model 66:141–155MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He QD, Wang NM, Yang Z, He ZW, Jiang B (2019) Competitive collection under channel inconvenience in closed-loop supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 275(1):155–166MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong XP, Wang ZJ, Wang DZ, Zhang HG (2013) Decision models of closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing under hybrid dual-channel collection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:1851–1865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang M, Song M, Lee LH, Ching WK (2013) Analysis for strategy of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channel. Int J Prod Econ 144(2):510–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleindorfer PR, Singhal K, Wassenhove LN (2005) Sustainable operations management. Prod Oper Manag 14(4):482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu LW, Wang ZJ, Xu L, Hong XP, Govindan K (2017) Collection effort and reverse channel choices in a closed-loop supply chain. J Clean Prod 144:492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ma YY, Sia CL, Li Y, Zheng SY (2016) Sources of resources, alliance green management, and alliance performance in an emerging economy. J Clean Prod 139:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pei J, Pardalos PM, Liu XB, Fan WJ, Yang SL (2015) Serial batching scheduling of deteriorating jobs in a two-stage supply chain to minimize the makespan. Eur J Oper Res 244:13–25MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pei J, Darzic Z, Drazic M, Mladenovic N, Pardalos PM (2018) Continuous variable neighborhood search (C-VNS) for solving systems of nonlinear equations. INFORMS J Comput. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pei J, Cheng BY, Liu XB, Pardalos PM, Kong M (2019a) Single-machine and parallel-machine serial-batching scheduling problems with position-based learning effect and linear setup time. Ann Oper Res 272(1–2):217–241MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pei J, Liu XB, Fan WJ, Pardalos PM, Lu SJ (2019b) A hybrid BA-VNS algorithm for coordinated serial-batching scheduling with deteriorating jobs, financial budget, and resource constraint in multiple manufacturers. Omega 82:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pei J, Wei JL, Liao BY, Liu XB, Pardalos PM (2019c) Two agent scheduling on bounded parallel batching machines with an aging effect of job position dependent. Ann Oper Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reimann M, Xiong Y, Zhou Y (2019) Managing a closed-loop supply chain with process innovation for remanufacturing. Eur J Oper Res 276(2):510–518MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Savaskan RC, Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Reverse channel design: the case of competing retailers. Manag Sci 52(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Savaskan RC, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manag Sci 50(2):239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wadin J, Ahlgren K, Bengtsson L (2017) Joint business model innovation for sustainable transformation of industries—a large multinational utility in alliance with a small solar energy company. J Clean Prod 160:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang WB, Ding JF, Sun H (2018) Reward-penalty mechanism for a two-period closed-loop supply chain. J Clean Prod 203:898–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei J, Govindan K, Li YJ, Zhao J (2015) Pricing and collecting decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with symmetric and asymmetric information. Comput Oper Res 54:257–265MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu L, Wang C (2018) Sustainable manufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain considering emission reduction and remanufacturing. Resour Conserv Recycl 131:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang T, Fu C, Liu X, Pei J, Liu L, Pardalos PM (2018) Closed-loop supply chain inventory management with recovery information of reusable containers. J Combin Optim 35(1):266–292MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang P, Xiong Y, Xiong ZK, Yan W (2014) Designing contracts for a closed-loop supply chain under information asymmetry. Oper Res Lett 42(2):150–155MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang SG, Ding YJ, Liu B, Pan DA, Chang CC, Volinsky AA (2015) Challenges in legislation, recycling system and technical system of waste electrical and electronic equipment in China. Waste Manag 45:361–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhen L, Sun QJ, Wang K, Zhang XT (2019) Facility location and scale optimisation in closed-loop supply chain. Int J Prod Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and Aviation ServicesChongqing Industry Polytechnic CollegeChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations