# Improved approximation algorithms for single-tiered relay placement

- 253 Downloads
- 2 Citations

## Abstract

We consider the problem of Single-Tiered Relay Placement with Basestations, which takes as input a set \(S\) of sensors and a set \(B\) of basestations described as points in a normed space \((M,d)\), and real numbers \(0< r\le R\). The objective is to place a minimum cardinality set \(Q\) of wireless relay nodes that connects \(S\) and \(B\) according to the following rules. The sensors in \(S\) can communicate within distance \(r\), relay nodes in \(Q\) can communicate within distance \(R\), and basestations are considered to have an infinite broadcast range. Together the sets \(S, B\), and \(Q\) induce an undirected graph \(G=(V,E)\) defined as follows: \(V=S\cup B\cup Q\) and \(E=\{uv|u,v\in B\}\cup \{uv|u\in Q\) and \(v\in Q\cup B\) and \(d(u,v)\le R\} \cup \{uv|u\in S\) and \(v\in S\cup Q\cup B\) and \(d(u,v)\le r\}\). Then \(Q\) connects \(S\) and \(B\) when this induced graph is connected. In the case of the two-dimensional Euclidean plane, we get a \((1+\ln 6+\epsilon )<2.8\)-approximation algorithm, improving the previous best ratio of 3.11. Let \(\varDelta \) be the maximum number of points on a unit ball with pairwise distance strictly bigger than 1. Under certain assumptions, we have a \(\left( 1+\ln (\varDelta +1)+\epsilon \right) \)-approximation algorithm. When biconnectivity is required, we show that a variant of our previously proposed algorithm has approximation ratio of \(\varDelta + 2\). In the case of the two-dimensional Euclidean plane, our ratio of 7 improves our previous bound of 16.

## Keywords

Approximation algorithm Wireless network Steiner points Biconnectivity## Notes

### Acknowledgments

Gruia Calinescu research was supported in part by NSF Grant CCF-0515088. Benjamin Grimmer research was supported in part by a College of Science Undergraduate Summer Research Award. Satyajayant Misra research was done while at Arizona State University, and was supported in part by ARO Grant W911NF-04-1-0385, and NSF Grants CNS-1248109 and HRD-1345232. Sutep Tongngam research was done while at the Illinois Institute of Technology, and was supported in part by NSF Grant CCF-0515088. Guoliang Xue research was supported in part by NSF Grant CCF-1115129 and ARO Grant W911AF-09-1-0467. The information reported here does not reflect the position or the policy of the federal government. Weiyi Zhang research was done while at Arizona State University, and was supported in part by NSF Grant ANI-0312635.

## References

- Arora S (1998) Polynomial time approximation schemes for Euclidean traveling salesman and other geometric problems. JACM 45(5):753–782MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Auletta V, Dinitz Y, Nutov Z, Parente D (1999) A 2-approximation algorithm for finding an optimum 3-vertex-connected spanning subgraph. J Algorithms 32:21–30MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Borchers A, Du D-Z (1997) The k-Steiner ratio in graphs. SIAM J Comput 26(3):857–869MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bryant V (1985) Metric spaces: iteration and application. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Calinescu G (2012) Relay placement for two-connectivity. In: Bestak R, Kencl L, Li LE, Widmer J, Yin H (eds) Networking (2) lecture notes in computer science, vol 7290. Springer, Berlin, pp 366–377Google Scholar
- Calinescu G, Tongngam S (2008) Relay nodes in wireless sensor networks. In: Li Y, Huynh DT, Das S, Du D-Z (eds) Wireless algorithms, systems, and applications, of lecture notes in computer science, vol 5258. Springer, Berlin, pp 286–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen D, Du D-Z, Hu X-D, Lin G-H, Wang L, Xue G (2001) Approximations for Steiner trees with minimum number of Steiner points. Theor Comput Sci 262(12):83–99MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Cheng X, Du D-Z, Wang L, Xu B (2008) Relay sensor placement in wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 14(3):347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen N, Nutov Z (2013) Approximating 0,1,2-survivable networks with minimum number of Steiner points. CoRR, arXiv:1304.7571
- Efrat A, Fekete SP, Gaddehosur PR, Mitchell JS, Polishchuk V, Suomela J (2008) Improved approximation algorithms for relay placement. In: Halperin D, Mehlhorn K (eds) Algorithms - ESA 2008, lecture notes in computer science, vol 5193. Springer, Berlin / Heidelberg, pp 356–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Efrat A, Fekete S.P, Gaddehosur P.R, Mitchell J.S, Polishchuk V, Suomela J Improved approximation algorithms for relay placement. from http://webstaff.itn.liu.se/valpo40/pages/papers.html
- Fleischer L, Jain K, Williamson DP (2006) Iterative rounding 2-approximation algorithms for minimum-cost vertex connectivity problems. J Comput Syst Sci 72:838–867MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Frank A (2011) Connections in combinatorial optimization. Oxford University Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Frank A, Tardos E (1989) An application of submodular flows. Linear Algebr Appl 114(115):320–348MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Gabow HN (1993) A representation for crossing set families with applications to submodular flow problems. In: Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete algorithms, SODA ’93, pages 202–211, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsGoogle Scholar
- Gröpl C, Hougardy S, Nierhoff T, Prömel HJ (2001) Approximation algorithms for the Steiner tree problem in graphs. In: Du D-Z, Cheng X (eds) Steiner trees in industries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 235–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kashyap A, Khuller S, Shayman M (2006) Relay placement for higher order connectivity in wireless sensor networks. INFOCOM 2006. 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings, pp 1–12Google Scholar
- Kashyap A, Khuller S, Shayman MA (2011) Relay placement for fault tolerance in wireless networks in higher dimensions. Comput Geom 44(4):206–215MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Khuller S, Raghavachari B (1996) Improved approximation algorithms for uniform connectivity problems. J Algorithms 21:433–450MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Lin G-H, Xue G (1999) Steiner tree problem with minimum number of Steiner points and bounded edge-length. Inf Process Lett 69(2):53–57MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd EL, Xue G (2007) Relay node placement in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Comput 56(1):134–138MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mandoiu II, Zelikovsky AZ (2000) A note on the MST heuristic for bounded edge-length Steiner trees with minimum number of Steiner points. Inf Process Lett 75(4):165–167MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Martini H, Swanepoel KJ (2006) Low-degree minimal spanning trees in normed spaces. Appl Math Lett 19(2):122–125MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Nutov Z, Yaroshevitch A (2009) Wireless network design via 3-decompositions. Inf Process Lett 109(19):1136–1140MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Robins G, Salowe JS (1995) Low-degree minimum spanning trees. Discret Comput Geom 14(2):151–165MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Tang J, Hao B, Sen A (2006) Relay node placement in large scale wireless sensor networks. Comput Commun 29:490–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zelikovsky A (1996) Better approximation bounds for the network and Euclidean Steiner tree problems. Technical Report CS-96-06, Department of Computer Science, University of VirginiaGoogle Scholar
- Zelikovsky AZ (1993) An 11/6-approximation algorithm for the network Steiner problem. Algorithmica 9(5):463–470MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- Zhang W, Xue G, Misra S (2007) Fault-tolerant relay node placement in wireless sensor networks: Problems and algorithms. INFOCOM 2007. Proceedings 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. pp 1649–1657Google Scholar