Physiological abnormalities in patients admitted with acute exacerbation of COPD: an observational study with continuous monitoring
- 35 Downloads
Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) may rapidly require intensive care treatment. Evaluation of vital signs is necessary to detect physiological abnormalities (micro events), but patients may deteriorate between measurements. We aimed to assess if continuous monitoring of vital signs in patients admitted with AECOPD detects micro events more often than routine ward rounds. In this observational pilot study (NCT03467815), 30 adult patients admitted with AECOPD were included. Patients were continuously monitored with peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate, and respiratory rate during the first 4 days after admission. Hypoxaemic events were defined as decreased SpO2 for at least 60 s. Non-invasive blood pressure was also measured every 15–60 min. Clinical ward staff measured vital signs as part of Early Warning Score (EWS). Data were analysed using Fisher’s exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Continuous monitoring detected episodes of SpO2 < 92% in 97% versus 43% detected by conventional EWS (p < 0.0001). Events of SpO2 < 88% was detected in 90% with continuous monitoring compared with 13% with EWS (p < 0.0001). Sixty-three percent of patients had episodes of SpO2 < 80% recorded by continuous monitoring and 17% had events lasting longer than 10 min. No events of SpO2 < 80% was detected by EWS. Micro events of tachycardia, tachypnoea, and bradypnoea were also more frequently detected by continuous monitoring (p < 0.02 for all). Moderate and severe episodes of desaturation and other cardiopulmonary micro events during hospitalization for AECOPD are common and most often not detected by EWS.
KeywordsContinuous monitoring Wireless electronic devices Vital signs Physiological abnormalities Deterioration Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
M. E.: Received funding from Copenhagen Center for Health Technology (CACHET). The WARD-Project Group received funding from The Danish Cancer Society, The A. P. Møller Foundation, and Innovation Fund Denmark. Other authors: Departmental funding only.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
M. E. reports departmental research funding from Merck Sharp & Dome Corp. outside the submitted work. C S. M. reports direct and indirect research funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Other authors report none.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Global Health Estimates 2016: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/. Accessed 22 Sep 2017.
- 4.Connors AF, Dawson NV, Thomas C, Harrell FE, Desbiens N, Fulkerson WJ, et al. Outcomes following acute exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive lung disease. The SUPPORT investigators (Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154(4 Pt 1):959–67. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS): standardising the assessment of acute illness severity in the NHS. Report of a working party. London: RCP; 2012. http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/national-early-warning-score-standardising-assessment-acute-illness-severity-nhs.pdf.
- 10.Vallance D, Bonnici T, Tarassenko L, Charlton P, Orphanidou C, Clifton D. Signal quality indices for the electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram: derivation and applications to wireless monitoring. IEEE J Biomed Heal Inform. 2014;19:1.Google Scholar
- 12.Kause J, Smith G, Prytherch D, Parr M, Flabouris A, Hillman K, et al. A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests, deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom: the ACADEMIA study. Resuscitation. 2004;62:275–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.05.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hodgetts TJ, Kenward G, Vlachonikolis IG, Payne S, Castle N. The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team. Resuscitation. 2002;54:125–131. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12161291. Accessed 21 Jan 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Petersen JA, Mackel R, Antonsen K, Rasmussen LS. Serious adverse events in a hospital using early warning score: what went wrong? Resuscitation. 2014;85:1699–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kellett J, Woodworth S, Wang F, Huang W. Changes and their prognostic implications in the abbreviated Vitalpac™ early warning score (ViEWS) after admission to hospital of 18,853 acutely ill medical patients. Resuscitation. 2013;84:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.08.331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Eccles SR, Subbe C, Hancock D, Thomson N. CREWS: improving specificity whilst maintaining sensitivity of the National Early Warning Score in patients with chronic hypoxaemia. Resuscitation. 2014;85:109–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.08.277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Churpek MM, Adhikari R, Edelson DP. The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards. Resuscitation. 2016;102:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.Steinhubl SR, Feye D, Levine AC, Conkright C, Wegerich SW, Conkright G. Validation of a portable, deployable system for continuous vital sign monitoring using a multiparametric wearable sensor and personalised analytics in an Ebola treatment centre. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1:e000070. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000070.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar