A simplified quantitative acid–base approach for patients with acute respiratory diseases
- 23 Downloads
The Stewart-Figge acid–base model has been criticized for being mathematically complex. We aimed to develop simpler formalisms, which can be used at the bedside. The following simplifications were used: (1) [Ca2+] and [Mg2+] are replaced by their mid-reference concentrations (2) pH is set to 7.4. In the new model [SIDa] is replaced by its adjusted form, [SIDa, adj] = [Na+] + [K+] − [Cl−] + 6.5 and [SIG] is replaced by “bicarbonate gap”, [BICgap] = [SIDa, adj] − (0.28⋅[Albumin]) − (1.82⋅[Phosphatei])- [HCO3̄]. The diagnostic performance of the model was tested in 210 patients with acute respiratory diseases and 17 healthy volunteers. [BICgap] was also compared to albumin-corrected anion gap ([AGc]). The concordant correlation coefficient between [SIDa, adj] and [SIDa] and between [BICgap] and [SIG] was 0.98 in both comparisons. The mean bias (limits of agreement) of [SIDa, adj] − [SIDa] and of [BICgap] − [SIG] were 0.53 meq/l (− 0.46 to 1.53) and 0.50 meq/l (− 0.70 to 1.70), respectively. A [SIDa, adj] < 50.4 meq/l had an accuracy of 0.995 (p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of strong ion (SI) acidosis, while a [SIDa, adj] > 52.5 meq/l had an accuracy of 0.997 (p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of SI alkalosis. A [BICgap] > 11.6 meq/l predicted unmeasured ion (UI) acidosis with an accuracy of 0.997 (p < 0.001), while an [AGc] > 19.88 meq/l predicted UI acidosis with an accuracy of 0.994 (p < 0.001). The “[BICgap] model” is a reliable tool for the assessment of acid–base disorders in patients with acute respiratory diseases. [BICgap] is not inferior to [AGc] in the diagnosis of UI acidosis.
KeywordsAnion gap Base excess Stewart-Figge acid–base model Metabolic acidosis Unmeasured ions
MA designed the study, performed statistical analysis and co-authored the manuscript. MP, CK and EK collected and analyzed the data and co-authored the manuscript. ST and ES participated in data analysis and co-authored the manuscript. DC co-authored and reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Figge J, Rossing TH, Fencl V. The role of serum proteins in acid-base equilibria. J Lab Clin Med. 1991;117(6):453–67.Google Scholar
- 3.Figge J. Role of non-volatile weak acids (albumin, phosphate and citrate). In Kellum J, Elbers PWJ, editors. Stewart’s textbook of acid base. Oxford: Lulu Enterprises; 2009. p. 217–22.Google Scholar
- 13.Roberts WL, McMillin GA, Burtis CA, Bruns DE. Reference information for the clinical laboratory. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, Bruns DE, editors. Tietz’s fundamentals of clinical chemistry. 6th ed. St Louis: Saunders; 2008. pp. 836–87.Google Scholar
- 14.Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.Google Scholar
- 16.Mcbride GB. Proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s concordant correlation coefficient. Hamilton: NIWA Client Report: Ham 2005-062; 2005. p. 6. https://www.medcalc.org/download/pdf/McBride2005.pdf.
- 22.Nagaoka D, Nassar Junior AP, Maciel AT, Taniguchi LU, Noritomi DT, Azevedo LCP, et al. The use of sodium-chloride difference and chloride-sodium ratio as strong ion difference surrogates in the evaluation of metabolic acidosis in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25(3):525–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Horowitz GL, Altaie S, Boyd JC, Ceriotti F, Garg U, Horn P, et al. Defining. establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; Approved Guideline—Third Edition. Document C28-A3, Vol. 28 No.30. CLSI; 2010.Google Scholar