Advertisement

Positive end-expiratory pressure increases arterial oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing urological surgery using laryngeal mask airway in lithotomy position

  • Doo-Hwan Kim
  • Jun-Young Park
  • Jihion Yu
  • Gi-Ho Koh
  • Eunkyul Kim
  • Jai-Hyun Hwang
  • Young-Kug KimEmail author
Original Research
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Elderly patients undergoing urological surgery in the lithotomy position may be vulnerable to perioperative hypoxemia. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can improve arterial oxygenation. Although laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is widely utilized in urological surgery, it is not known how PEEP affects arterial oxygenation in these patients. We, therefore, evaluated the effect of PEEP on arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) in elderly patients using LMA during urological surgery in the lithotomy position. Patients randomly received zero end-expiratory pressure (group Z, n = 34) or PEEP of 7 cmH2O (group P, n = 33). Ventilatory, respiratory, and haemodynamic variables were measured at 5 min (T0), 30 min (T1), and 60 min (T2) after LMA Supreme™ (sLMA) insertion. The primary outcome was the difference of PaO2 at T2 between the two groups. Atelectasis score, the incidence of a significant leak, and complications associated with sLMA insertion were also evaluated. PaO2 at T2 was significantly higher in group P than in group Z (20.0 ± 4.9 vs. 14.7 ± 3.7 kPa, P < 0.001). Atelectasis score at T2 was lower in group P than in group Z (5.3 ± 1.7 vs. 8.4 ± 2.3, P < 0.001). However, the incidence of a significant leak and complications associated with LMA insertion did not significantly differ between the two groups. PEEP can improve arterial oxygenation and reduce atelectasis in elderly patients using sLMA during urological surgery in the lithotomy position, suggesting that PEEP may be useful for elderly patients with an increased risk of perioperative hypoxemia when using sLMA.

Keywords

Positive end-expiratory pressure Arterial oxygen partial pressure Elderly patients LMA Supreme Lithotomy position 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Froehner M, Brausi MA, Herr HW, Muto G, Studer UE. Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol. 2009;56(3):443–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Güldner A, Kiss T, Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Canet J, Spieth PM, et al. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complicationsa comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(3):692–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Navajas D, Farre R, Rotger MM, Milic-Emili J, Sanchis J. Effect of body posture on respiratory impedance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988;64(1):194–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Morgan and Mikhail’s clinical anesthesiology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. p.P 673–4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ball L, Pelosi P. Intraoperative ventilation and postoperative respiratory assistance. BJA Educ. 2017;17(11):357–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wetterslev J, Hansen E, Roikjaer O, Kanstrup I, Heslet L. Optimizing peroperative compliance with PEEP during upper abdominal surgery: effects on perioperative oxygenation and complications in patients without preoperative cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2001;18(6):358–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fredman B, Sheffer O, Zohar E, Paruta I, Richter S, Jedeikin R, et al. Fast-track eligibility of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic surgery procedures. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(3):560–4. table of contents.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gong Y-H, Yi J, Zhang Q, Xu L. Effect of low dose rocuronium in preventing ventilation leak for flexible laryngeal mask airway during radical mastectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):13616–21.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Futier E, Constantin J-M, Petit A, Jung B, Kwiatkowski F, Duclos M, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves end-expiratory lung volume but not oxygenation after induction of anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(6):508–13.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Habre W, Peták F. Perioperative use of oxygen: variabilities across age. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(Suppl 2(suppl_2):ii26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao X, Huang S, Wang Z, Chen L, Li S. Relationship between respiratory dynamics and body mass index in patients undergoing general anesthesia with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and comparison between lithotomy and supine positions. medical science monitor. Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2016;22:2706–13.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    SupremeTM TL. Instruction manual. Maidenhead: Intavent Orthofix Ltd; 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teoh W, Lee K, Suhitharan T, Yahaya Z, Teo M, Sia A. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel™ in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(12):1173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergmann I, Crozier TA, Roessler M, Schotola H, Mansur A, Büttner B, et al. The effect of changing the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation with the LMA-Supreme® on device position, ventilatory complications, and airway morbidity: a clinical and fiberscopic study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14(1):2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cook T, Gatward J, Handel J, Hardy R, Thompson C, Srivastava R, et al. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme™ in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(5):555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):428–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monastesse A, Girard F, Massicotte N, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Girard M. Lung ultrasonography for the assessment of perioperative atelectasis: a pilot feasibility study. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(2):494–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim YB, Chang YJ, Jung WS, Byen SH, Jo YY. Application of PEEP using the i-gel during volume-controlled ventilation in anesthetized, paralyzed patients. J Anesth. 2013;27(6):827–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Latorre F, Eberle B, Weiler N, Mienert R, Stanek A, Goedecke R, et al. Laryngeal mask airway position and the risk of gastric insufflation. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(4):867–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiler N, Latorre F, Eberle B, Goedecke R, Heinrichs W. Respiratory mechanics, gastric insufflation pressure, and air leakage of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg. 1997;84(5):1025–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Von Goedecke A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Hoermann C. Positive pressure versus pressure support ventilation at different levels of PEEP using the proseal (TM) laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004;32(6):804.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bouvet L, Miquel A, Chassard D, Boselli E, Allaouchiche B, Benhamou D. Could a single standardized ultrasonographic measurement of antral area be of interest for assessing gastric contents? A preliminary report. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(12):1015–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bouvet L, Albert M-L, Augris C, Boselli E, Ecochard R, Rabilloud M, et al. Real-time detection of gastric insufflation related to facemask pressure–controlled ventilation using ultrasonography of the antrum and epigastric auscultation in nonparalyzed patientsa prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(2):326–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guimaraes MM, El Dib R, Smith AF, et al. Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in upper abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD006058.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-Supreme™, comparison with LMA-Proseal™. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(7):852–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smetana GW, Lawrence VA, Cornell JE. Preoperative pulmonary risk stratification for noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):581–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tran D, Rajwani K, Berlin DA. Pulmonary effects of aging. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2018;31(1):19–23.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coppola S, Froio S, Chiumello D. Protective lung ventilation during general anesthesia: is there any evidence? Crit Care. 2014;18(2):210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Redfors B, Bragadottir G, Sellgren J, Swärd K, Ricksten S-E. Acute renal failure is NOT an “acute renal success”—a clinical study on the renal oxygen supply/demand relationship in acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(8):1695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ni C, Xu T, Li N, Tian Y, Han Y, Xue Q, et al. Cerebral oxygen saturation after multiple perioperative influential factors predicts the occurrence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15(1):156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Devereaux P, Goldman L, Cook DJ, Gilbert K, Leslie K, Guyatt GH. Perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review of the magnitude of the problem, the pathophysiology of the events and methods to estimate and communicate risk. CMAJ. 2005;173(6):627–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Extermann M, Overcash J, Lyman GH, Parr J, Balducci L. Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(4):1582–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Daizoh Satoh S, Kurosawa W, Kirino T, Wagatsuma Y, Ejima A, Yoshida, et al. Impact of changes of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity at low tidal volume ventilation during general anesthesia. J Anesth. 2012;26(5):664–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Spadaro S, Karbing DS, Mauri T, Marangoni E, Mojoli F, Valpiani G, et al. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary shunt and dynamic compliance during abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(6):855–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Gregoretti C, Pelosi P. PEEP role in ICU and operating room: from pathophysiology to clinical practice. Sci World J. 2014;2014:852356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goldmann K, Gerlach M, Bornträger C. ProSeal™ laryngeal mask in normal weight and obese patients: oxygenation under pressure-controlled ventilation and different end-expiratory pressures. Anaesthesist. 2011;60(10):908–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H. Use of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for pressure-controlled ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure in paediatric patients: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(6):831–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tusman G, Böhm SH, Tempra A, Melkun F, García E, Turchetto E, et al. Effects of recruitment maneuver on atelectasis in anesthetized children. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(1):14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Eichenberger A-S, Proietti S, Wicky S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn D, et al. Morbid obesity and postoperative pulmonary atelectasis: an underestimated problem. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(6):1788–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Iizuka T, Ishii N. The efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway during positive-pressure ventilation under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:S240.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Acosta CM, Maidana GA, Jacovitti D, Belaunzarán A, Cereceda S, Rae E, et al. Accuracy of transthoracic lung ultrasound for diagnosing anesthesia-induced atelectasis in children. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(6):1370–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xirouchaki N, Magkanas E, Vaporidi K, Kondili E, Plataki M, Patrianakos A, et al. Lung ultrasound in critically ill patients: comparison with bedside chest radiography. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(9):1488–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hess DR. Respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. Respir Care. 2014;59(11):1773–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations