Advertisement

Evaluation and application of a method for estimating nasal end-tidal O2 fraction while administering supplemental O2

  • Kyle M. Burk
  • Kai Kuck
  • Joseph A. OrrEmail author
Original Research
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

This paper describes a method for estimating the oxygen enhanced end-tidal fraction of oxygen (FetOe), the end-tidal fraction of oxygen (FetO2) that is raised by administering supplemental oxygen. The paper has two purposes: the first is to evaluate the method’s accuracy on the bench and in volunteers; the second purpose is to demonstrate how to apply the method to compare two techniques of oxygen administration. The method estimates FetOe by analyzing expired oxygen as oxygen washes out of the lung. The method for estimating FetOe was first validated using a bench simulation in which tracheal oxygen was measured directly. Then it was evaluated in 30 healthy volunteers and compared to the bench simulation. Bland–Altman analysis compared calculated and observed FetOe/FetO2 measurements. After the method was evaluated, it was implemented to compare the FetOe obtained when administering oxygen using two different techniques (pulsed and continuous flow). A total of eighteen breath washout conditions were evaluated on the bench. FetOe estimates and tracheal FetO2 had a mean difference of − 0.016 FO2 with 95% limits of agreement from − 0.048 to 0.016 FO2. Thirteen breath washouts per volunteer were analyzed. Extrapolated and observed FetO2 had a mean difference of − 0.001 FO2 with 95% limits of agreement from − 0.006 to 0.004 FO2. Pulsed flow oxygen (PFO) achieved the same FetOe values as continuous flow oxygen (CFO) using 32.1% ± 2.27% (mean ± SD) of the CFO rate. This paper has demonstrated that the method estimates FetO2 enhanced by administering supplemental oxygen with clinically insignificant differences. This paper has also shown that PFO can obtain FetO2 similar to CFO using approximately one-third of the oxygen volume. After evaluating this method, we conclude that the method provides useful estimates of nasal FetO2 enhanced by supplemental oxygen administration.

Keywords

Nasal end-tidal O2 fraction measurement Mathematical modeling Pulsed flow oxygen Continuous flow oxygen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Utah Space Grant Consortium Graduate Research Fellowship (K.M.B.). The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their attentive review and insightful comments.

Funding

This study was partially funded by Dynasthetics, LLC.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Kyle Burk: Dynasthetics LLC. Kai Kuck: No Conflict of Interest. Joseph Orr: Dynasthetics LLC.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research involving human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Weingarten M. Respiratory monitoring of carbon dioxide and oxygen: a ten-year perspective. J Clin Monit. 1990;6:217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edmark L, Kostova-Aherdan K, Enlund M, Hedenstierna G. Optimal oxygen concentration during induction of general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miner JR, Heegaard W, Plummer D. End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during procedural sedation. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Linko K, Paloheimo M. Monitoring of the inspired and end-tidal oxygen, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide concentrations: clinical applications during anesthesia and recovery. J Clin Monit. 1989;5:149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Folke M, Cernerud L, Ekström M, Hök B. Critical review of non-invasive respiratory monitoring in medical care. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003;41:377–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morrison JE, Friesen RH, Koyle MA. The oxygram: an unappreciated technique for assessing hypoventilation in paediatric anaesthesia. Pediatr Anesth. 1994;4:39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keidan I, Gravenstein D, Berkenstadt H, Ziv A, Shavit I, Sidi A. Supplemental oxygen compromises the use of pulse oximetry for detection of apnea and hypoventilation during sedation in simulated pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 2008;122:293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fu ES, Downs JB, Schweiger JW, Miguel RV, Smith RA. Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry. Chest. 2004;126:1552–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Downs JS. Prevention of hypoxemia: the simple, logical, but incorrect solution. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6:180–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chang K-C, Orr J, Hsu W-C, Yu L, Tsou M-Y, Westenskow DR, Ting C-K. Accuracy of CO2 monitoring via nasal cannulas and oral bite blocks during sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Clin Monit Computg. 2016;30:169–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ebert TJ, Novalija J, Uhrich TD, Barney JA. The effectiveness of oxygen delivery and reliability of carbon dioxide waveforms: a crossover comparison of 4 nasal cannulae. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:342–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yanagidate F, Dohi S. Modified nasal cannula for simultaneous oxygen delivery and end-tidal CO2 monitoring during spontaneous breathing. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23:257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ortega R, Connor C, Kim S, Djang R, Patel K. Monitoring ventilation with capnography. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:e27–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Myles P, Heap M, Langley M. Agreement between end-tidal oxygen concentration and the alveolar gas equation: pre and post cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993;21:240–1.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chang K-C, Orr J, Hsu W-C, Yu L, Tsou M-Y, Westenskow DR, Ting C-K. Accuracy of CO2 monitoring via nasal cannulas and oral bite blocks during sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;30:169–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Banner MJ, Downs JB, Kirby RR, Smith RA, Boysen PG, Lampotang S. Effects of expiratory flow resistance on inspiratory work of breathing. Chest. 1988;93:795–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen JZ, Katz IM, Pichelin M, Zhu K, Caillibotte G, Noga ML, Finlay WH, Martin AR. Comparison of pulsed versus continuous oxygen delivery using realistic adult nasal airway replicas. Int J Chron Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017;12:2559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Groombridge C, Chin CW, Hanrahan B, Holdgate A. Assessment of common preoxygenation strategies outside of the operating room environment. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:342–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hayes-Bradley C, Lewis A, Burns B, Miller M. Efficacy of nasal cannula oxygen as a preoxygenation adjunct in emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;68:174–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bliss PL, McCoy RW, Adams AB. A bench study comparison of demand oxygen delivery systems and continuous flow oxygen. Respir Care. 1999;44:925–31.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327:307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fuhrman C, Chouaid C, Herigault R, Housset B, Adnot S. Comparison of four demand oxygen delivery systems at rest and during exercise for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2004;98:938–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yaeger ES, Goodman S, Hoddes E, Christopher KL. Oxygen therapy using pulse and continuous flow with a transtracheal catheter and a nasal cannula. Chest. 1994;106:854–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yuan LC, Jun Z, Min LP. Clinical evaluation of pulse-dose and continuous-flow oxygen delivery. Respir Care. 1995;40:811–4.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Braun SR, Spratt G, Scott GC, Ellersieck M. Comparison of six oxygen delivery systems for COPD patients at rest and during exercise. Chest. 1992;102:694–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts C, Bell J, Wedzicha J. Comparison of the efficacy of a demand oxygen delivery system with continuous low flow oxygen in subjects with stable COPD and severe oxygen desaturation on walking. Thorax. 1996;51:831–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhou S, Chatburn RL. Effect of the anatomic reservoir on low-flow oxygen delivery via nasal cannula: constant flow versus pulse flow with portable oxygen concentrator. Respir Care. 2014;59(8):1199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wettstein RB, Shelledy DC, Peters JI. Delivered oxygen concentrations using low-flow and high-flow nasal cannulas. Respir Care. 2005;50:604–9.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bower JS, Brook CJ, Zimmer K, Davis D. Performance of a demand oxygen saver system during rest, exercise, and sleep in hypoxemic patients. Chest. 1988;94:77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rinow ME, Saltzman AR. Effectiveness of a new oxygen demand valve in chronic hypoxemia. Chest. 1986;90:204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vlessides M. (2017) Prototype oxygen flowmeter delivers supplemental O2 at variable rate. May 17, 2017. Anesthesiology News, pp. 19.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Orr J, Burk K, Evaluation of end-tidal CO2 measurement during supplemental oxygen delivery using a prototype intelligent oxygen flowmeter. American Society of Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting 2016:A1104.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miguel-Montanes R, Hajage D, Messika J, Bertrand F, Gaudry S, Rafat C, Labbé V, Dufour N, Jean-Baptiste S, Bedet A. Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to prevent desaturation during tracheal intubation of intensive care patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:574–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Simon M, Wachs C, Braune S, de Heer G, Frings D, Kluge S. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus bag-valve-mask for preoxygenation before intubation in subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2016;61:1160–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Anesthesiology and BioengineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations