Advertisement

Pulmonary lung Doppler signals: normative data in a pediatric population compared with adults

  • Danielle S. BursteinEmail author
  • Rachel K. Hopper
  • Elisa K. McCarthy
  • Keeley Hall
  • Rachel Schatzberger
  • Yoram Palti
  • Jeffrey A. Feinstein
Original Research
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Lung Doppler signals (LDS) acquired via transthoracic echocardiography is a novel technology previously reported in adults for use in detecting pulmonary hypertension. The aim of this study was to characterize LDS in healthy children to establish normative pediatric LDS data, and compare the pediatric data to the previously published healthy adult LDS. In this prospective, two-center study, LDS were acquired in children without cardiopulmonary disease using a 2 MHz transthoracic pulsed Doppler transducer. The data were processed to obtain Doppler velocity patterns corresponding to phases of the cardiac cycle. Signals were analyzed using a parametric Doppler signal-processing package and performance evaluation of the trained classifiers was performed using cross validation method. Pediatric signals were then compared to a retrospective cohort of healthy adults. Eighty-six healthy pediatric subjects (mean age 9.1 ± 5.1 years) and 79 healthy adult controls (mean age 59.7 ± 10.7 years) were included. The normative LDS velocity profiles were defined for pediatric subjects and then compared to adults; the highest discriminating LDS parameters between healthy children and adults were acceleration of atrial (A) signal contraction (46 ± 18 vs. 90 ± 34; p < 0.001), peak systolic (S) signal velocity (10.0 ± 3.5 vs. 11.7 ± 3.5; p < 0.001), and ratio of peak diastolic (D)-to-atrial (A) signal velocity (1.4 ± 0.5 vs. 0.4 ± 0.3; p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of this LDS based method to discern between healthy children and adult subjects was 98.6% and 97.4%, respectively. Subgroup analyses between younger (2–8 years) and older (9–18 years) pediatric LDS yielded significant differences between atrial (A) acceleration (43.7 ± 33.9 vs. 47.7 ± 42.1; p = 0.04) and diastolic (D)-to-atrial (A) signal velocity (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5; p = 0.01) but not systolic (S) signals (0.14 ± 0.05 vs. 0.14 ± 0.05; p = 0.97). In this study, we defined the normal LDS profile for healthy children and have demonstrated differences in LDS between children and adults. Specifically, healthy children had lower atrial contraction power, differences in ventricular compliance and increased chronotropic response. Further studies are warranted to investigate the application of this technology, for example as a tool to aid in the detection of pulmonary hypertension in children.

Keywords

Non-invasive diagnosis Lung doppler signal Screening Pediatric 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Danielle S. Burstein, Rachel K. Hopper, Elisa K. McCarthy, Keeley Hall and Jeffrey A. Feinstein have no conflict of interest. Rachel Schatzberger is an employee of Echosense Ltd. Yoram Palti is an officer and shareholder of Echosense Ltd.

Supplementary material

10877_2019_258_MOESM1_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Performance and ROC curve for the detection of pediatric subjects in comparison to adult controls based on LDS profile—Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Taleb M, et al., The diagnostic accuracy of doppler echocardiography in assessment of pulmonary artery systolic pressure: a meta-analysis. Echocardiography 2012;(30)3:258–65.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rich JD, et al. Inaccuracy of Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary artery pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension: implications for clinical practice. Chest. 2011;139(5):988–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farber HW, et al. REVEAL Registry: correlation of right heart catheterization and echocardiography in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Congest Heart Fail. 2011;17(2):56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mikhak Z, Pedersen PC. Acoustic attenuation properties of the lung: an open question. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(9):1209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palti Y, et al. Pulmonary Doppler signals: a potentially new diagnostic tool. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(12):940–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Godinas L, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension from lung Doppler signal: a proof of concept study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(5):903–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palti Y, et al. Footprints of cardiac mechanical activity as expressed in lung Doppler signals. Echocardiography. 2015;32(3):407–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naeye RL. Development of systemic and pulmonary arteries from birth through early childhood. Biol Neonat. 1966;10(1):8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hislop A, Reid L. Pulmonary arterial development during childhood: branching pattern and structure. Thorax. 1973;28(2):129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haworth SG, Hislop AA. Pulmonary vascular development: normal values of peripheral vascular structure. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52(5):578–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rabinovitch M, Hopper R. Pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension. In: Hugh A, Daniel P, Feltes D, Cetta F, editors. Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants, children and adolescents. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016. p. 1483–517.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rendas A, Branthwaite M, Reid L. Growth of pulmonary circulation in normal pig–structural analysis and cardiopulmonary function. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978;45(5):806–17.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suzue M, et al. Developmental changes in the left ventricular diastolic wall strain on M-mode echocardiography. J Echocardiogr. 2014;12(3):98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friedman WF. The intrinsic physiologic properties of the developing heart. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1972;15(1):87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eidem BW, et al. Impact of cardiac growth on Doppler tissue imaging velocities: a study in healthy children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(3):212–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fleming S, et al. Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies. Lancet. 2011;377(9770):1011–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ploegstra MJ, et al. Pulmonary arterial stiffness indices assessed by intravascular ultrasound in children with early pulmonary vascular disease: prediction of advanced disease and mortality during 20-year follow-up. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(2):216–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danielle S. Burstein
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rachel K. Hopper
    • 2
  • Elisa K. McCarthy
    • 4
  • Keeley Hall
    • 2
  • Rachel Schatzberger
    • 3
  • Yoram Palti
    • 3
  • Jeffrey A. Feinstein
    • 2
  1. 1.Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Stanford Children’s HospitalPalo AltoUSA
  3. 3.Echosense LtdHaifaIsrael
  4. 4.University of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations