Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 281–290 | Cite as

Performance and applications of bedside visual inspection of airway pressure–time curve profiles for estimating stress index in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

  • Phunsup WongsurakiatEmail author
  • Nadwipa Yuangtrakul
Original Research

Abstract

To determine the performance of bedside visual inspection of airway pressure-time (Paw–t) curve profiles (VI) for estimating stress index (SI) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A prospective study in 30 subjects with ARDS receiving mechanical ventilation at two peak inspiratory flow (PIF) settings: 60 or 40 L/min. For each study session, two physicians inspected real-time Paw–t waveforms from mechanical ventilator’s monitoring screens at bedside for 30 s and interpreted which of the three patterns (tidal recruitment, noninjurious ventilation or tidal overdistension) the Paw–t curve profile was compatible with. Subsequently, the study was repeated again at the second PIF setting. SI was derived from a standardized dedicated software program and categorized into three groups: SI < 0.9, or tidal recruitment; SI = 0.9–1.05, or noninjurious ventilation; and SI > 1.05, or tidal overdistension. The lower PIF setting increased the sensitivity of VI to correctly estimate SI (75% vs. 50%; p = 0.005). At PIF 40 L/min, the likelihood ratio of a positive test was 3.6, 5.4 or 7 if the Paw–t curve profile was interpreted as noninjurious ventilation, tidal recruitment or tidal overdistension, respectively. The likelihood ratio of a negative test ranged from 0.55 for tidal recruitment to 0.32 and 0.19 for noninjurious ventilation and tidal overdistension, respectively. Experience in mechanical ventilation did not influence the accuracy. Bedside VI is moderately accurate for estimating SI and may be used to monitor injurious ventilation in patients with ARDS, in addition to plateau airway pressure.

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation Waveform Ventilator-associated lung injury Overdistension Recruitment Accuracy 

Abbreviations

Pplat

End-inspiratory plateau airway pressure

SI

Stress index

Paw–t

Airway pressure–time

VI

Visual inspection of airway pressure–time curve profiles

PIF

Peak inspiratory flow

VT

Tidal volume

BF

Baseline flow

LF

Lower flow

LE

Less experience

ME

More experience

LR

Likelihood ratio

PLR

Likelihood ratio of a positive test

NLR

Likelihood ratio of a negative test

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Khemajira Karaketklang for statistical assistance; and Sarun Kraivee for his technical assistance with ‘Datalogger’.

Authors contribution

PW is guarantor for the entire manuscript. PW contributed to the conception, hypothesis, outline, and design of the study; data acquisition; data analysis; drafting the manuscript; and substantial involvement in its revision prior to submission. NY contributed to the design of the study; data acquisition; drafting the manuscript; and substantial involvement in its revision prior to submission.

Funding

This research received no specific grants from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants or the participants’next of kin.

References

  1. 1.
    Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(1):294–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slutsky A, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2126–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curley GF, Laffey JG, Zhang H, Slutsky AS. Biotrauma and ventilator-induced lung injury: Clinical Implications. Chest. 2016;150(5):1109–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kallet RH. The complexity of interpreting plateau pressure in ARDS. Respir Care. 2015;60(1):147–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hager DN, Krishnan JA, Hayden DL, Brower RG; ARDS Clinical Trials Network. Tidal volume reduction in patients with acute lung injury when plateau pressures are not high. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(10):1241–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Terragni PP, Rosboch G, Tealdi A, Corno E, Menaldo E, Davini O, Gandini G, Herrmann P, Mascia L, Quintel M, Slutsky AS, Gattinoni L, Ranieri VM. Tidal hyperinflation during low tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:160–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seeley E, McAuley DF, Eisner M, Miletin M, Matthay MA, Kallet RH. Respiratory system compliance and severity of hypoxemia as predictors of outcome in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Thorax. 2008;63(11):994–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seeley EJ, McAuley DF, Eisner M, Miletin M, Zhuo H, Matthay MA, Kallet RH. Decreased respiratory system compliance on day 6 of mechanical ventilation is a predictor of death in patients with established acute lung injury. Respir Res. 2011;12(1):52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, Caironi P, Valenza F, Polli F, Tallarini F, Cozzi P, Cressoni M, Colombo A, Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:346–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grasso S, Terragni P, Mascia L, Fanelli V, Quintel M, Herrmann P, Hedenstierna G, Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Airway pressure-time curve profile (stress index) detects tidal recruitment/hyperinflation in experimental acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1018–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ranieri VM, Zhang H, Mascia L, Aubin M, Lin CY, Mullen JB, Grasso S, Binnie M, Volgyesi GA, Eng P. Slutsky AS. Pressure-time curve predicts minimally injurious ventilatory strategy in an isolated rat lung model. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1320–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Perrot M, Imai Y, Volgyesi GA, Waddell TK, Liu M, Mullen JB, McRae K, Zhang H, Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM, Keshavjee S. Effect of ventilator-induced lung injury on the development of reperfusion injury in a rat lung transplant model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124(6):1137–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gama de Abreu M, Heintz M, Heller A, Szechenyi R, Albrecht DM, Koch T. One-lung ventilation with high tidal volumes and zero positive end-expiratory pressure is injurious in the isolated rabbit lung model. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:220–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carvalho AR, Spieth PM, Pelosi P, Vidal Melo MF, Koch T, Jandre FC, Giannella-Neto A, de Abreu MG. Ability of dynamic airway pressure curve profile and elastance for positive end-expiratory pressure titration. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:2291–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrando C, Suárez-Sipmann F, Gutierrez A, Tusman G, Carbonell J, García M, Piqueras L, Compañ D, Flores S, Soro M, Llombart A, Belda FJ. Adjusting tidal volume to stress index in an open lung condition optimizes ventilation and prevents overdistension in an experimental model of lung injury and reduced chest wall compliance. Crit Care. 2015;19:9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grasso S, Stripoli T, De Michele M, Bruno F, Moschetta M, Angelelli G, Munno I, Ruggiero V, Anaclerio R, Cafarelli A, Driessen B. Fiore T. ARDSnet ventilatory protocol and alveolar hyperinflation: role of positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:761–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang Y, Yang Y, Chen Q, Liu S, Liu L, Pan C, Yang C, Qiu H. Pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: positive end-expiratory pressure titration needs stress index. J Surg Res. 2013;185:347–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chiumello D, Cressoni M, Carlesso E, Caspani ML, Marino A, Gallazzi E, Caironi P, Lazzerini M, Moerer O, Quintel M, Gattinoni L. Bedside selection of positive end-expiratory pressure in mild, moderate, and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:252–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Terragni PP, Filippini C, Slutsky AS, Birocco A, Tenaglia T, Grasso S, Stripoli T, Pasero D, Urbino R, Fanelli V, Faggiano C, Mascia L, Ranieri VM. Accuracy of plateau pressure and stress index to identify injurious ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:880–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Formenti P, Umbrello M, Graf J, Adams AB, Dries DJ, Marini JJ. Reliability of transpulmonary pressure-time curve profile to identify tidal recruitment/hyperinflation in experimental unilateral pleural effusion. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31(4):783–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gattinoni L, Bombino M, Pelosi P, Lissoni A, Pesenti A, Fumagalli R, Tagliabue M. Lung structure and function in different stages of severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 1994;271(22):1772–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A. LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmidt GA. Counterpoint: should positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with ARDS be set based on oxygenation? No. Chest. 2012;141(6):1382–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kallet RH. Should PEEP titration be based on chest mechanics in patients with ARDS? Respir Care. 2016;61(6):876–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 2012;307:2526–33.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature: III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test: what are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994;271:703–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tobin MJ. Mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(15):1056–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Colombo D, Cammarota G, Alemani M, Carenzo L, Barra FL, Vaschetto R, Slutsky AS, Della Corte F, Navalesi P. Efficacy of ventilator waveforms observation in detecting patient-ventilator asynchrony. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(11):2452–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(8):646–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Respiratory Disease, Department of Medicine, Siriraj HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations