Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 233–239 | Cite as

A comparison of ventricular systolic function indices provided by VolumeView/EV1000™ and left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography among septic shock patients

  • Nitchakan Nakwan
  • Ply Chichareon
  • Bodin KhwannimitEmail author
Original Research
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the cardiac function index (CFI) and global ejection fraction (GEF) obtained by VolumeView/EV1000™, with the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography in septic shock patients. A prospective observational study was conducted in a medical intensive care unit of a tertiary, teaching university hospital. Thirty-two, mechanical-ventilated septic shock patients were included in this study. We simultaneously measured CFI and GEF with LVEF. The correlation of CFI, GEF along with LVEF and ability of CFI and GEF to predict LVEF ≥ 40, 50 and 60% were evaluated. There were 192 pairs of CFI, GEF and LVEF. CFI was significantly correlated with GEF (r = 0.82, P < 0.0001). A significant correlation was observed between CFI and LVEF (r = 0.56, P < 0.0001) and GEF and LVEF (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001). The CFI and GEF had a good predictive ability for estimating LVEF ≥ 40, 50 and 60%, with an area under receiving operating characteristic (AUC) 0.875–0.934. The CFI ≥ 3/min predicted LVEF ≥ 40% with sensitivity 95.1% and specificity 48.3%. The GEF ≥ 15%, estimated LVEF ≥ 40% with sensitivity 92.6% and specificity 69%. There were 40 thermodilution and LVEF measurements obtained before and after norepinephrine adjustment. Blood pressure as well as the cardiac index were significantly increased, whereas there were no changes in CFI, GEF and LVEF values. Conclusions: Both CFI and GEF obtained by VolumeView/EV1000™, correlated with LVEF, so as to provide a reliable estimation of LV systolic function in septic shock patients.

Keywords

Cardiac function index Global ejection fraction Hemodynamic monitoring Transpulmonary thermodilution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was support by a research grant from the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University. The authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Andrew Tait, of the International Affairs Department, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University for his help in editing this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by a research grant from the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University (Grant No. 58-366-14-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10877_2018_152_MOESM1_ESM.docx (814 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 814 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, Chastre J, Hudson LD, Manthous C, Meduri GU, Moreno RP, Putensen C, Stewart T, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27–28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(4):575–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0531-4.
  2. 2.
    Saugel B, Huber W, Nierhaus A, Kluge S, Reuter DA, Wagner JY. Advanced hemodynamic management in patients with septic shock. Biomed Res Int. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8268569.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teboul JL, Saugel B, Cecconi M, De Backer D, Hofer CK, Monnet X, Perel A, Pinsky MR, Reuter DA, Rhodes A, et al. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1350–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4375-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levitov A, Frankel HL, Blaivas M, Kirkpatrick AW, Su E, Evans D, Summerfield DT, Slonim A, Breitkreutz R, Price S, et al. Guidelines for the appropriate use of bedside general and cardiac ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically Ill patients-part II: cardiac ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(6):1206–27.  https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guerin L, Vieillard-Baron A. The use of ultrasound in caring for patients with Sepsis. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37(2):299–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Mayo PH, Vignon P, Cholley B, Slama M, Pinsky MR, McLean A, Choi G, Beaulieu Y, Arntfield R, et al. International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(5):654–66.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3228-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Geer L, Oscarsson A, Engvall J. Variability in echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular function in septic shock patients. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0015-6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGowan JH, Cleland JG. Reliability of reporting left ventricular systolic function by echocardiography: a systematic review of 3 methods. Am Heart J. 2003;146(3):388–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00248-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Monnet X, Teboul JL. Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):147.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1739-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sakka SG, Reuter DA, Perel A. The transpulmonary thermodilution technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012;26(5):347–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-012-9378-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bendjelid K, Giraud R, Siegenthaler N, Michard F. Validation of a new transpulmonary thermodilution system to assess global end-diastolic volume and extravascular lung water. Crit Care. 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9332.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kiefer N, Hofer CK, Marx G, Geisen M, Giraud R, Siegenthaler N, Hoeft A, Bendjelid K, Rex S. Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters. Crit Care. 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11366.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Combes A, Berneau JB, Luyt CE, Trouillet JL. Estimation of left ventricular systolic function by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(7):1377–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2289-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jabot J, Monnet X, Bouchra L, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Cardiac function index provided by transpulmonary thermodilution behaves as an indicator of left ventricular systolic function. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(11):2913–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b01fd9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perny J, Kimmoun A, Perez P, Levy B. Evaluation of cardiac function index as measured by transpulmonary thermodilution as an indicator of left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiogenic shock. Biomed Res Int. 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/598029.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ray P, Le Manach Y, Riou B, Houle TT. Statistical evaluation of a biomarker. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(4):1023–40.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d47604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148(3):839–43.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mutoh T, Kazumata K, Terasaka S, Taki Y, Suzuki A, Ishikawa T. Impact of transpulmonary thermodilution-based cardiac contractility and extravascular lung water measurements on clinical outcome of patients with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective observational study. Crit Care. 2014;18(4).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0482-4.
  20. 20.
    Suzuki T, Suzuki Y, Okuda J, Kurazumi T, Suhara T, Ueda T, Nagata H, Morisaki H. Sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction and β-adrenergic blockade therapy for sepsis. J Intensive Care. 2017;5:22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0215-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fenton KE, Parker MM. Cardiac function and dysfunction in sepsis. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37(2):289–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berrios RAS, O’Horo JC, Velagapudi V, Pulido JN. Correlation of left ventricular systolic dysfunction determined by low ejection fraction and 30-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2014;29(4):495–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prabhu MM, Yalakala SK, Shetty R, Thakkar A, Sitapara T. Prognosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in septic shock patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(3):5–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Charpentier J, Luyt CE, Fulla Y, Vinsonneau C, Cariou A, Grabar S, Dhainaut JF, Mira JP, Chiche JD. Brain natriuretic peptide: a marker of myocardial dysfunction and prognosis during severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):660–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Ccm.0000114827.93410.D8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weng L, Liu YT, Du B, Zhou JF, Guo XX, Peng JM, Hu XY, Zhang SY, Fang Q, Zhu WL. The prognostic value of left ventricular systolic function measured by tissue Doppler imaging in septic shock. Crit Care. 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11328.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Parker MM, McCarthy KE, Ognibene FP. JE. P. Right ventricular dysfunction and dilatation, similar to left ventricular changes, characterize the cardiac depression of septic shock in humans. Chest. 1990;97(1):126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pulido JN, Afesa B, Masaki M, Yuasa T, Gillespie S, Herasevich V, Brown DR, Oh JK. Clinical spectrum, frequency, and significance of myocardial dysfunction in severe sepsis and septic shock. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(7):620-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vieillard-Baron A, Caille V, Charron C, Belliard G, Page B, Jardin F. Actual incidence of global left ventricular hypokinesia in adult septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(6):1701–6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318174db05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dalla K, Hallman C, Bech-Hanssen O, Haney M, Ricksten SE. Strain echocardiography identifies impaired longitudinal systolic function in patients with septic shock and preserved ejection fraction. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-015-0025-4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Orde SR, Pulido JN, Masaki M, Gillespie S, Spoon JN, Kane GC, Oh JK. Outcome prediction in sepsis: speckle tracking echocardiography based assessment of myocardial function. Crit Care. 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal MedicinePrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicinePrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand
  3. 3.Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicinePrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand

Personalised recommendations