Advertisement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1081–1091 | Cite as

Feasibility of continuous sedation monitoring in critically ill intensive care unit patients using the NeuroSENSE WAVCNS index

  • Nicholas West
  • Paul B. McBeth
  • Sonia M. Brodie
  • Klaske van Heusden
  • Sarah Sunderland
  • Guy A. Dumont
  • Donald E. G. Griesdale
  • J. Mark Ansermino
  • Matthias GörgesEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging, as both over- and under-sedation are detrimental. Current methods of assessment, such as the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), are measured intermittently and rely on patients’ behavioral response to stimulation, which may interrupt sleep/rest. A non-stimulating method for continuous sedation monitoring may be beneficial and allow more frequent assessment. Processed electroencephalography (EEG) monitors have not been routinely adopted in the ICU. The aim of this observational study was to assess the feasibility of using the NeuroSENSE™ monitor for EEG-based continuous sedation assessment. With ethical approval, ICU patients on continuous propofol sedation were recruited. Depth-of-hypnosis index (WAVCNS) values were obtained from the NeuroSENSE. Bedside nurses, blinded to the NeuroSENSE, performed regular RASS assessments and maintained the sedation regimen as per standard of care. Participants were monitored throughout the duration of their propofol infusion, up to 24 h. Fifteen patients, with median [interquartile range] age of 57 [52–62.5] years were each monitored for a duration of 9.0 [5.7–20.1] h. Valid WAVCNS values were obtained for 89% [66–99] of monitoring time and were widely distributed within and between individuals, with 6% [1–31] spent < 40 (very deep), and 3% [1–15] spent > 90 (awake). Significant EEG suppression was detected in 3/15 (20%) participants. Observed RASS matched RASS goals in 36/89 (40%) assessments. The WAVCNS variability, and incidence of EEG suppression, highlight the limitations of using RASS as a standalone sedation measure, and suggests potential benefit of adjunct continuous brain monitoring.

Keywords

Sedation monitoring Critical care Electroencephalography Depth of hypnosis Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Denise Foster and all of the nurses at the Vancouver General Hospital ICU for their help during data collection.

Author contributions

PBM, MG, SS, JMA, GAD and DEGG conducted the literature review and designed the study. PBM, JMA, GAD and DEGG obtained the ethical approval to conduct the research. SB, NW, MG and SS performed the data collection. PBM, SB, NW, KVH, MG, and JMA analyzed and interpreted the findings. NW, PBM, SB, MG, and JMA drafted the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Guy A Dumont is a co-inventor of the NeuroSENSE (NeuroWave Systems Inc., Cleveland, OH) and has consulted for NeuroWave Systems Inc. J Mark Ansermino has consulted for NeuroWave Systems Inc. All remaining authors have no disclosures.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained for this study from the University of British Columbia (UBC) Clinical Research Ethics Board (H14-01358). All study procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of this institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Research involving human and animal participants and informed consent

Informed consent was obtained for all individual participants included in the study; with permission from the UBC Clinical Research Ethics Board, informed consent was deferred to a substitute decision maker, and obtained post-hoc from participants when possible.

References

  1. 1.
    Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, Hall JB. Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1471–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes CG, McGrane S, Pandharipande PP. Sedation in the intensive care setting. Clin Pharmacol. 2012;4:53–63.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barr J, Kishman CP, Jaeschke R. The methodological approach used to develop the 2013 pain, agitation, and delirium clinical practice guidelines for adult ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:S1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gélinas C, Dasta JF, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:263–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morandi A, Brummel NE, Ely EW. Sedation, delirium and mechanical ventilation: the “ABCDE” approach. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17:43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rudolph JL, Marcantonio ER. Postoperative delirium: acute change with long-term implications. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:1202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wujtewicz M, Maciejewski D, Misiołek H, Fijałkowska A, Gaszyński T, Knapik P, et al. Use of dexmedetomidine in the adult intensive care unit. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013;45:235–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O’Neal PV, Keane KA, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbato M, Barclay G, Potter J, Yeo W, Chung J. Correlation between observational scales of sedation and comfort and bispectral index scores. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;54:186–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carrasco G. Instruments for monitoring intensive care unit sedation. Crit Care. 2000;4:217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tasaka CL, Duby JJ, Pandya K, Wilson MD, A Hardin K. Inadequate sedation during therapeutic paralysis: use of bispectral index in critically ill patients. Drugs-real World Outcomes. 2016;3:201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freedman NS, Kotzer N, Schwab RJ. Patient perception of sleep quality and etiology of sleep disruption in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:1155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garrett KM. Best practices for managing pain, sedation, and delirium in the mechanically ventilated patient. Crit. Care Nurs. Clin North Am. 2016;28:437–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bibian S, Dumont GA, Zikov T. Dynamic behavior of BIS, M-entropy and neuroSENSE brain function monitors. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25:81–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Z-H, Chen H, Yang Y-L, Shi Z-H, Guo Q-H, Li Y-W, et al. Bispectral index can reliably detect deep sedation in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective multicenter validation study. Anesth. Analg. 2017;125:176–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zikov T, Bibian S, Dumont GA, Huzmezan M, Ries CR. Quantifying cortical activity during general anesthesia using wavelet analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006;53:617–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rouche O, Wolak-Thierry A, Destoop Q, Milloncourt L, Floch T, Raclot P, et al. Evaluation of the depth of sedation in an intensive care unit based on the photo motor reflex variations measured by video pupillometry. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landais A, Boichut N, Dussaussoy C, et al. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:546–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vivien B, Di Maria S, Ouattara A, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B. Overestimation of bispectral index in sedated intensive care unit patients revealed by administration of muscle relaxant. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haenggi M, Ypparila-Wolters H, Buerki S, Schlauri R, Korhonen I, Takala J, et al. Auditory event-related potentials, bispectral index, and entropy for the discrimination of different levels of sedation in intensive care unit patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:807–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karamchandani K, Rewari V, Trikha A, Batra RK. Bispectral index correlates well with Richmond agitation sedation scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. J Anesth. 2010;24:394–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yaman F, Ozcan N, Ozcan A, Kaymak C, Basar H. Assesment of correlation between bispectral index and four common sedation scales used in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16:660–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olson DM, Zomorodi MG, James ML, Cox CE, Moretti EW, Riemen KE, et al. Exploring the impact of augmenting sedation assessment with physiologic monitors. Aust Crit Care. 2014;27:145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prottengeier J, Moritz A, Heinrich S, Gall C, Schmidt J. Sedation assessment in a mobile intensive care unit: a prospective pilot-study on the relation of clinical sedation scales and the bispectral index. Crit Care. 2014;18:615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herta J, Koren J, Fürbass F, Zöchmeister A, Hartmann M, Hosmann A, et al. Applicability of NeuroTrend as a bedside monitor in the neuro ICU. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:1000–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sackey PV. Frontal EEG for intensive care unit sedation: treating numbers or patients? Crit. Care. 2008;12:186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Soehle M, Dittmann A, Ellerkmann RK, Baumgarten G, Putensen C, Guenther U. Intraoperative burst suppression is associated with postoperative delirium following cardiac surgery: a prospective, observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15:61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watson PL. Measuring sleep in critically ill patients: beware the pitfalls. Crit Care. 2007;11:159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alvarez V, Rossetti AO. Clinical use of EEG in the ICU: technical setting. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32:481–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guérit J-M, Amantini A, Amodio P, Andersen KV, Butler S, de Weerd A, et al. Consensus on the use of neurophysiological tests in the intensive care unit (ICU): electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), and electroneuromyography (ENMG). Neurophysiol Clin. 2009;39:71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Page VJ, McAuley DF. Sedation/drugs used in intensive care sedation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28:139–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pasin L, Greco T, Feltracco P, Vittorio A, Neto CN, Cabrini L, et al. Dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e82913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Absalom AR, Menon DK. BIS and spectral entropy monitoring during sedation with midazolam/remifentanil and dexmedetomidine/remifentanil. Crit Care. 2009;13:137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agrawal G, Modarres M, Zikov T, Bibian S. NREM sleep staging using WAV(CNS) index. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25:137–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & TherapeuticsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Departments of Surgery and Critical Care MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.BC Children’s Hospital Research InstituteVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations