Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 221–225 | Cite as

Use of a patient completed iPad questionnaire to improve pre-operative assessment

Original Research

Abstract

Developments in healthcare technology could improve patient care and reduce healthcare costs. There is a need to facilitate communication and increase efficiency in surgical pre-assessment clinics. This study aimed to develop an iPad application to deliver an electronic patient questionnaire, and to evaluate its use in the pre-assessment environment. Software was developed, MyOp, for a standard iPad that mirrored the paper-based pre-assessment system, with features designed for ease of patient use and remote data transfer. A case–control study was conducted, comparing use of MyOp with paper-based practice, to evaluate feasibility and patient preference. Patients were offered the use of MyOp or paper-based system. Outcomes measured included time to complete iPad questionnaire, consultation duration, and a patient preference questionnaire. MyOp cost £3500 to develop. 104 individuals participated in the study, 53 MyOp and 51 controls. MyOp reduced the median consultation duration by 5.00 min. A reduction was seen in all subgroups except those aged over 70 or urology patients. Patients preferred to complete the form independently, using a touchpad or computer but expressed concerns about data security. Use of an electronic patient questionnaire reduces consultation time delivering greater efficiency of pre-assessment nurse time. Preconceived ideas about the use of technology in older age groups are likely inaccurate and less of a barrier than previously thought. Electronic pre-assessments could be used routinely to reduce demands on healthcare facilities, improve patient care, and triage patients prior to clinic attendance.

Keywords

Surgery Mobile application Preoperative assessment Patient questionnaire Handheld computers Electronics 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP. A review of the potential benefits from the better use of information and technology in Health and Social Care. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217012/DoH-Review-of-Information-and-Technology-Use-Final-Report-V2.pdf.
  3. 3.
    Department of Health. Digital first, the delivery choice for England’s population. 2012. http://www.imi.org.uk/file/download/3758/DigitalFirstFullReport.pdf.
  4. 4.
    IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    VanDenKerkhof EG, Goldstein DH, Blaine WC, Rimmer MJ. A comparison of paper with electronic patient-completed questionnaires in a preoperative clinic. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(4):1075–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matthew AG, Currie KL, Irvine J, Ritvo P, Santa Mina D, Jamnicky L, et al. Serial personal digital assistant data capture of health-related quality of life: a randomized controlled trial in a prostate cancer clinic. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dua A, Jones G, Wood H, Sidhu H. Understanding women’s experiences of electronic interviewing during the clinical episode in urogynaecology: a qualitative study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1969–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hawes R, Andrzejowski J, Goodhart I, Mills G, Berthoud M. Evaluation of the influence of ASA classification on duration of anaesthetic pre-assessment consultation time. British Journal of Anaesthesia Conference: Winter Anaesthetic Research Society Meeting, ARS 2013 London United Kingdom Conference Publication: 2014; 112(1): 181P–2P.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
  2. 2.Division of Clinical Sciences, Leeds Institute of Molecular MedicineUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations