Accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 770 Downloads
To systemically evaluate the accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. A literature search of PUBMED, OVID, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang Data for clinical studies in which the accuracy of pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness was performed (last update 5 April 2015). Related journals were also searched manually. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality according to the modified QUADAS items. Heterogeneous studies and meta-analysis were conducted by Meta-Disc 1.4 software. A subgroup analysis in the operating room (OR) and in intensive care unit (ICU) was also performed. Differences between subgroups were analyzed using the interaction test. A total of 18 studies involving 665 subjects were included. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients was 0.88 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.84–0.91]. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 (95 % CI 0.68–0.78) and 0.82 (95 % CI 0.77–0.86), respectively. No heterogeneity was found within studies nor between studies. And there was no significant heterogeneity within each subgroup. No statistical differences were found between OR subgroup and ICU subgroup in the AUC [0.89 (95 % CI 0.85–0.92) versus 0.90 (95 % CI 0.82–0.94); P = 0.97], and in the specificity [0.84 (95 % CI 0.75–0.86) vs. 0.84 (95 % CI 0.75–0.91); P = 1.00]. Sensitivity was higher in the OR subgroup than the ICU subgroup [0.84 (95 % CI 0.78–0.88) vs. 0.56 (95 % CI 0.47–0.64); P = 0.00004]. The pleth variability index has a reasonable ability to predict fluid responsiveness.
KeywordsPleth variability index Fluid responsiveness Meta-analysis Sensitivity Specificity AUC
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no financial relationship with any organization and have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(1):134–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lu W, Dong J, Xu Z, Shen H, Zheng J. The pleth variability index as an indicator of the central extracellular fluid volume in mechanically ventilated patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with initial distribution volume of glucose. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:386–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM, Wietasch JK, Hendriks HG, Scheeren TW. Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(6):940–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Fischer MO, Pelissier A, Bohadana D, Gérard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(6):1087–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, Prasser C, Moritz S, Graf BM, Wiesenack C. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:555–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:200–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Higgins JP1, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58.Google Scholar
- 40.Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM, Porte RJ, Wietasch JK, Scheeren TW, Hendriks HG. Accuracy of non-invasive measurement of haemoglobin concentration by pulse co-oximetry during steady state and dynamic conditions in patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:522–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Bergek C, Zdolsek JH, Hahn RG. Accuracy of noninvasive haemoglobin measurement by pulse oximetry depends on the type of infusion fluid. Eur J Anaesth. 2012;29:586–92.Google Scholar