Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 351–355 | Cite as

Monitoring of intense neuromuscular blockade in a pig model

  • Matias V. Madsen
  • Anders M. Donatsky
  • Bente R. Jensen
  • Jacob Rosenberg
  • Karsten P. Hammelev
  • Mona R. Gätke
Original Research

Abstract

Intense neuromuscular blockade (NMB) measured by post tetanic count (PTC) was monitored, reversed and verified in this pig model. In a cross-over assessor blinded design six pigs were randomized to either no NMB followed by intense NMB, or intense NMB followed by no NMB. Neuromuscular measurements were performed with acceleromyography [train-of-four (TOF) Watch SX]. In all pigs, the response to TOF nerve stimulation was stable and intense NMB (PTC 0–1) was established with rocuronium 3 mg/kg. For reversal, the pigs received sugammadex 20–35 mg/kg and returned to TOF-ratio above 0.90 within 2.15 min after injection. We established a pig model for monitoring intense NMB with surface stimulation electrodes and acceleromyography. We verified total relaxation of the diaphragm and the abdominal muscles at the PTC 0–1 by suction test and with surface electromyography. This pig model is suitable for studies with experimental abdominal surgery with monitoring of intense NMB, and where relaxation of the diaphragm and the abdominal muscles are required.

Keywords

Neuromuscular monitoring Pig model Post-tetanic count Neuromuscular blockade Abdominal surgery 

Notes

Conflict of interest

This study was supported in part by a Research Grant from the Merck Investigator Initiated Studies Program. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Merck. Jacob Rosenberg and Mona Ring Gätke have received payments for lectures and travel funding from Merck.

Ethical standard

The Animal Experiments Inspectorate approved the study.

References

  1. 1.
    King M, Sujirattanawimol N, Danielson DR, Hall BA, Schroeder DR, Warner DO. Requirements for muscle relaxants during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1392–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:129–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernando PU, Viby-Mogensen J, Bonsu AK, Tamilarasan A, Muchhal KK, Lambourne A. Relationship between posttetanic count and response to carinal stimulation during vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987;31:593–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dhonneur G, Kirov K, Motamed C, et al. Post-tetanic count at adductor pollicis is a better indicator of early diaphragmatic recovery than train-of-four count at corrugator supercilii. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:376–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pittet JF, Morel DR, Mentha G, et al. Vecuronium neuromuscular blockade reflects liver function during hepatic autotransplantation in pigs. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:168–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Veres-Nyeki KO, Rieben R, Spadavecchia C, Bergadano A. Pancuronium dose refinement in experimental pigs used in cardiovascular research. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2012;39:529–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789–808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Viby-Mogensen J, Howardy-Hansen P, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B, Ording H, Engbaek J, Nielsen A. Posttetanic count (PTC): a new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 1981;55:458–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alderson B, Senior JM, Jones RS, Dugdale AH. Use of rocuronium administered by continuous infusion in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2007;34:251–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin-Flores M, Gleed RD, Basher KL, Scarlett JM, Campoy L, Kopman AF. TOF-Watch(R) monitor: failure to calculate the train-of-four ratio in the absence of baseline calibration in anaesthetized dogs. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:240–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei F, Eddie CR. The post-tetanic count during vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in halothane-anaesthetized dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009;36:246–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirov K, Motamed C, Ndoko SK, Dhonneur G. TOF count at corrugator supercilii reflects abdominal muscles relaxation better than at adductor pollicis. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:611–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Claudius C, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:1117–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herweling A, Latorre F, Herwig A, Horstick G, Kempski O, Gervais HW. The hemodynamic effects of ephedrine on the onset time of rocuronium in pigs. Anesth.Analg. 2004; 99: 1703–7, table.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pape A, Kertscho H, Stein P, et al. Neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium bromide increases the tolerance of acute normovolemic anemia in anesthetized pigs. Eur Surg Res. 2012;48:16–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matias V. Madsen
    • 1
  • Anders M. Donatsky
    • 2
  • Bente R. Jensen
    • 3
  • Jacob Rosenberg
    • 2
  • Karsten P. Hammelev
    • 4
  • Mona R. Gätke
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Herlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenHerlevDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Herlev HospitalUniversity of CopenhagenHerlevDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Nutrition, Exercise and SportsUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen NDenmark
  4. 4.Laboratory Animal Veterinarian, Department of Experimental MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen NDenmark

Personalised recommendations