Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 207–215

A model-based decision support system for critiquing mechanical ventilation treatments

Article
  • 172 Downloads

Abstract

A computerized system for critiquing mechanical ventilation treatments is presented that can be used as an aide to the intensivist. The presented system is based on the physiological model of the subject’s respiratory system. It uses modified versions of previously developed models of adult and neonatal respiratory systems to simulate the effects of different ventilator treatments on the patient’s blood gases. The physiological models that have been used for research and teaching purposes by many researchers in the field include lungs, body tissue, and the brain tissue. The lung volume is continuously time-varying and the effects of shunt in the lung, changes in cardiac output and cerebral blood flow, and the arterial transport delays are included in the system. Evaluation tests were done on adult and neonate patients with different diagnoses. In both groups combined, the differences between the arterial partial pressures of CO2 predicted by the system and the experimental values were 1.86 ± 1.6 mmHg (mean ± SD), and the differences between the predicted arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation values, SaO2, and the experimental values measured by using pulse oximetry, SpO2, were 0.032 ± 0.02 (mean ± SD). The proposed system has the potential to be used alone or in combination with other decision support systems to set ventilation parameters and optimize treatment for patients on mechanical ventilation.

Keywords

Decision support systems Mechanical ventilation Physiological modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Chatburn RL, Mireles-Cabodevila E. Closed-loop control of mechanical ventilation: description and classification of targeting schemes. Resp Care. 2011;56:85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tehrani FT. Automatic control of mechanical ventilation. Part 2: the existing techniques and future trends. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:417–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rudowski R, Frostell C, Gill H. A knowledge-based support system for mechanical ventilation of the lungs. The KUSIVAR concept and prototype. Comput Meth Prog Biomed. 1989;30:59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sittig DF, Pace NL, Gardner RM, Beck E, Morris AH. Implementation of a computerized patient advice system using the HELP clinical information system. Comput Biomed Res. 1989;22:474–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sittig DF, Gardner RM, Morris AH, Wallace CJ. Clinical evaluation of computer-based respiratory care algorithms. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1990;7:177–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tong DA. Weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. A knowledge-based system approach. Comput Meth Prog Biomed. 1991;35:267–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    East TD, Bohm SH, Wallace CJ, Clemmer TP, Weaver LK, Orme JF Jr, Morris AH. A successful computerized protocol for clinical management of pressure control inverse ratio ventilation in ARDS patients. Chest. 1992;101(3):697–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dojat M, Brochard L, Lemaire F, Harf A. A knowledge-based system for assisted ventilation of patients in intensive care units. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1992;9:239–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strickland JH Jr, Hassan JH. A computer controlled ventilator weaning system. Chest. 1993;103:1220–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shahsavar N, Ludwigs U, Blomqvist H, Gill H, Wigertz O, Matell G. Evaluation of a knowledge-based decision support system for ventilator therapy management. Artif Intell Med. 1995;7:37–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nemoto T, Hatzakis GE, Thorpe CW, Olivenstein R, Dial S, Bates JHT. Automatic control of pressure support mechanical ventilation using fuzzy logic. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:550–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    East TD, Heermann LK, Bradshaw RL, Lugo A, Sailors RM, Ershler L et al. (1999) Efficacy of computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation: Results of a prospective multi-center randomized trial. Proc AMIA Symp 251–255Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McKinley BA, Moore FA, Sailors RM, Cocanour CS, Marquez A, Wright RK, Tonnesen AS, Wallace CJ, Morris AH, East TD. Computerized decision support for mechanical ventilation of trauma induced ARDS: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Trauma. 2001;50:415–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rees SE, Allerod C, Murley D, Zhao Y, Smith BW, Kjargaard S, Thorgaard P, Andreassen S. Using physiological models and decision theory for selecting appropriate ventilator settings. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:421–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tehrani FT, Roum JH. FLEX: a new computerized system for mechanical ventilation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:121–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tehrani FT, Roum JH. Intelligent decision support systems for mechanical ventilation. Artif Intell Med. 2008;44:171–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris AH. The importance of protocol-directed patient management for research on lung-protective ventilation. In: Dreyfuss D, Saumon G, Hubamyr R, editors. Ventilation-induced lung injury. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006. p. 537–610.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tehrani FT. Critiquing treatment and setting ventilatory parameters by using physiological modeling. Proc. IEEE EMBS. 2009;31:286–8.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fincham WF, Tehrani FT. A mathematical model of the human respiratory system. J Biomed Eng. 1983;5:125–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tehrani FT. Mathematical analysis and computer simulation of the respiratory system in the newborn infant. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993;40:475–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Batzel JJ, Tran HT. Modeling instability in the control system for human respiration: applications to infant no-rem sleep. Appl Math Comput. 2000;110:1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Qiu A, Bai J. Multiple modeling in the study of interaction of hemodynamics and gas exchange. Comput Biol Med. 2001;31:59–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mananas MA, Navarro C, Romero S, Grino R, Rabinovich R, Benito S, Caminal P (2002) Control system response of different respiratory models under ventilatory stimuli and pathologies. In: Proceedings of 15th World Congress International Federation on Automatic Control (IFAC), 15:2317–2322Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tehrani FT, Rogers M, Lo T, Malinowski T, Afuwape S, Lum M, Grundl B, Terry M. A dual closed-loop control system for mechanical ventilation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004;18:111–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hernandez AM, Mananas MA, Costa-Castello R. Learning respiratory system function in BME studies by means of a virtual laboratory: respilab. IEEE Trans Edu. 2008;51:24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riley RL. Gas exchange and transportation. In: Ruch TC, Patton HD, editors. Physiology and biophysics. 20th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1973. p. 761–87.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Visser BF. Pulmonary diffusion of carbon dioxide. Phys Med Biol. 1960;5:155–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fincham WF, Tehrani FT. On the regulation of cardiac output and cerebral blood flow. J Biomed Eng. 1983;5:73–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. New Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tehrani FT, Abbasi S. Evaluation of a computerized system for mechanical ventilation of infants. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23:93–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smatlak P, Knebel AR. Clinical evaluation of noninvasive monitoring of oxygen saturation in critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7(5):370–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilson BJ, Cowan HJ, Lord JA, Zuege DJ, Zygun DA. The accuracy of pulse oximetry in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Emerg Med. 2010;10:9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shiao SYPK, Ou CN. Validation of oxygen saturation monitoring in neonates. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16(2):168–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringCalifornia State University, FullertonFullertonUSA
  2. 2.CHOP Newborn CarePennsylvania HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of PediatricsUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations