Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A comparative study of pulse rate variability and heart rate variability in healthy subjects

Abstract

Both heart rate variability (HRV) and pulse rate variability (PRV) are noninvasive means for the assessment of autonomic nervous control of the heart. However, it is not settled whether or not the PRV obtained from either hand can be the surrogate of HRV. The HRV measures obtained from electrocardiographic signals and the PRV measures obtained from the pulse waves recorded from the index fingers of both hands were compared in normal subjects by using linear regression analysis and Bland and Altman method. Highly significant correlations (P < 0.001, 0.89 < r < 1.0) were found between all HRV measures and the corresponding PRV measures of both hands. However, there were insufficient agreements in some measures between pairwise comparisons among HRV, right PRV and left PRV except heart rate and ultra-low frequency power (ULFP). The PRV of either hand is close to, but not the same as the HRV in healthy subjects. The HRV, right PRV and left PRV are not surrogates of one another in normal subjects except heart rate and ULFP. Since HRV is generally accepted as the standard method for the assessment of the autonomic nervous modulation of a subject, the PRV of either hand may not be suitable for the assessment of the cardiac autonomic nervous modulation of the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Huikuri HV. Heart rate variability in coronary artery disease. J Intern Med. 1995;237:349–57.

  2. 2.

    Raczak G, Pinna GD, La Rovere MT, et al. Cardiovagal response to acute mild exercise in young healthy subjects. Circ J. 2005;69:976–80.

  3. 3.

    Yanaqi S, Yoshinaqa M, Horiqome H, et al. Heart rate variability and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in young patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ J. 2004;68:757–62.

  4. 4.

    Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM, et al. The ability of several short-term measures of RR variability to predict mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;88:927–34.

  5. 5.

    Lombardi F, Sandrone G, Pernpruner S, et al. Heart rate variability as an index of sympathovagal interaction after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:1239–45.

  6. 6.

    Kleiger RE, Stein PK, Bigger JT. Heart rate variability: measurement and clinical utility. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005;10:88–101.

  7. 7.

    Pontet J, Contreras P, Curbelo A, et al. Heart rate variability as early marker of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in septic patients. J Crit Care. 2003;18:156–63.

  8. 8.

    Barnaby D, Ferrick K, Kaplan DT, et al. Heart rate variability in emergency department patients with sepsis. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:661–70.

  9. 9.

    McKinley PS, Shapiro PA, Bagiella E, et al. Deriving heart period variability from blood pressure waveforms. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:1431–8.

  10. 10.

    Srinivas K, Reddy L, Srinivas R. Third Kuala Lumpur international conference on biomedical engineering 2006. In: Estimation of heart rate variability from peripheral pulse wave using PPG sensors, vol. 15. Springer Berlin; 2007. P 325–328.

  11. 11.

    Carrasco S, González R, Jiménez J, et al. Comparison of the heart rate variability parameters obtained from the electrocardiogram and the blood pressure wave. J Med Eng Technol. 1998;22:195–205.

  12. 12.

    Lucena F, Barros AK, Takeuchi Y, et al. Heart instantaneous frequency based estimation of HRV from blood pressure waveforms. IEICE Trans Inform Syst. 2009;E92-D:529–537.

  13. 13.

    Constant I, Laude D, Murat I, et al. Pulse rate variability is not a surrogate for heart rate variability. Clin Sci. 1999;97:391–7.

  14. 14.

    Chuang SS, Shih CC, Yang JL, et al. Power spectral analysis of finger plethysmographic waveform in patients with coronary artery disease and after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circ J. 2006;70:1337–43.

  15. 15.

    Mitchell GF, Pfeffer MA, Finn PV, et al. Comparison of techniques for measuring pulse-wave velocity in the rat. J Appl Physiol. 1997;82:203–10.

  16. 16.

    Hayano J, Barros AK, Kamiya A, et al. Assessment of pulse rate variability by the method of pulse frequency demodulation. Biomed Eng Online. 2005;4:62.

  17. 17.

    Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 1996;93:1043–65.

  18. 18.

    Pomeranz B, Macaulay RJ, Caudill MA, et al. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:H151–3.

  19. 19.

    Taylor JA, Carr DL, Myers CW, et al. Mechanisms underlying very-low-frequency RR-interval oscillations in humans. Circulation. 1998;98:547–55.

  20. 20.

    Lu WA, Kuo CD. The effect of Tai Chi Chuan on the autonomic nervous modulation in older persons. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;35:1972–6.

  21. 21.

    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

  22. 22.

    Radespiel-Troger M, Rauh R, Mahlke C, Gottschalk T, Muck-Weymann M. Agreement of two different methods for measurement of heart rate variability. Clin Auton Res. 2003;13:99–102.

  23. 23.

    Rauh R, Limley R, Bauer R, Radespiel-Troger M, Muck-Weymann M. Comparison of heart rate variability and pulse rate variability detected with photoplethysmography. Proc Soc Photo-Opt Instrum Eng. 2004;5474:115–26.

  24. 24.

    Kleiger RE, Stein PK, Bosner MS, et al. Time domain measurements of heart rate variability. Cardiol Clin. 1992;10:487–98.

  25. 25.

    Ori Z, Monir G, Weiss J, et al. Heart rate variability: frequency domain analysis. Cardiol Clin. 1992;10:499–537.

  26. 26.

    Alekseeva I, Malkina TA, Sokolov SF. Interrelationship between changes of rate and variability of cardiac rhythm under influence of beta-adrenoblockers. Kardiologiia. 2007;47:24–34.

  27. 27.

    Shusterman V, Aysin B, Gottipaty V, et al. Autonomic nervous system activity and the spontaneous initiation of ventricular tachycardia. ESVEM investigators. Electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1891–8.

  28. 28.

    Khandoker AH, Karmakar CK, Palaniswami M. Comparison of pulse rate variability with heart rate variability during obstructive sleep apnea. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:204–9.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant VGHTPE93-361-5 from Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and a grant CCMP95-TP-040 from the Committee on Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Health, Taipei, Taiwan.

Author information

Correspondence to Cheng-Deng Kuo.

Additional information

Wan-An Lu and Kung-Tai Wu contributed equally with the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, J., Lu, W., Wu, K. et al. A comparative study of pulse rate variability and heart rate variability in healthy subjects. J Clin Monit Comput 26, 107–114 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-012-9340-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Autonomic nervous system
  • Heart rate variability
  • Pulse rate variability
  • Sympathetic
  • Vagal