The Tensys TL-200® noninvasive beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP) monitor displays continuous radial artery waveform as well as systolic, mean and diastolic BP from a pressure sensor directly over the radial artery at the wrist. It locates the site of maximal radial pulse signal, determines mean BP from maximal pulse waveform amplitude at optimal artery compression and then derives systolic and diastolic BP. We performed a cross-sectional study of TL-200 BP comparisons with contralateral invasive radial artery (A-Line) BP values in 19 subjects during an average 2.5 h of general anesthesia for a wide range of surgical procedures. Two hundred and fifty random sample pairs/patient resulted in 4,747 systolic, mean and diastolic BP pairs for analysis. A-Line BP ranged from 29 mm Hg diastolic to 211 mm Hg systolic, and heart rate varied between 38 and 210 beats/min. Bland–Altman analysis showed an average 2.3 mm Hg TL-200 versus A-Line systolic BP bias and limits of agreement (1.96 SD) were ± 15.3 mm Hg. Mean BP showed a 2.3 mm Hg TL-200 bias and ± 11.7 mm Hg limits of agreement, while diastolic BP showed a 1.7 mm Hg bias and ± 12.3 mm Hg limits of agreement. Coefficients of determination for TL-200 and A-Line BP regression were r² = 0.86 for systolic, r² = 0.86 for mean, and r² = 80 for diastolic BP, respectively, with no apparent change in correlation at low or high BP. Bland–Altman analysis suggested satisfactory agreement between TL-200 noninvasive beat-to-beat BP and invasive A-Line BP. Paired TL-200/A-Line BP comparisons showed a high coefficient of determination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Funding was provided by Tensys Medical, Inc., San Diego, CA.
Conflict of interest
Ron Dueck received research funding from Tensys Medical, Inc., via contract with Veterans Medical Research Foundation, San Diego, CA. Oliver Goedje consulted for Tensys.
Mark JB, Slaughter TF. Cardiovascular monitoring. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 1272.Google Scholar
Drzewiecki G, Hood R, Apple H. Theory of the oscillometric maximum and the systolic and diastolic detection ratios. Ann Biomedical Eng. 1994;22:88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Statistics. 2007;17:571–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janelle GM, Gravenstein N. An accuracy evaluation of the T-Line® Tensymeter continuous noninvasive blood pressure management device versus conventional invasive radial artery monitoring in surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:484–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark JB, Slaughter TF. Cardiovascular monitoring. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 1275–6.Google Scholar
Bur A, Hirschi MM, Herkner H, Oschatz E, Kofler J, Woisetschlager C, Laggner AN. Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:371–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szmuk P, Pivalizza E, Warters RD, Ezri T, Gebhard R. An evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter noninvasive blood pressure device during hypotension. Anaesth. 2008;63:307–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Runge I, Legras A, Dequin P-F, Mercier E, Wolff M, Regnier B, Boulain T. Tracking hypotension and dynamic changes in arterial pressure with brachial cuff measurements. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:494–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wax DB, Lin H-M, Leibowitz AB. Invasive and concomitant noninvasive intraoperative blood pressure monitoring. Observed differences in measurements and associated therapeutic interventions. Anesthesiol. 2011;115:973–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pytte M, Dybwik K, Sexton J, Straume B, Nielsen EW. Oscillometric brachial mean artery pressures are higher than intra-arterial mean artery pressures in intensive care unit patients receiving norepinephrine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:718–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pace NL, East TD. Simultaneous comparison of intraarterial, oscillometric, and Finapres monitoring during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991;73:213–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constant I, Laude D, Hentzgen E, Murat I. Does halothane really preserve cardiac baroreflex better than sevoflurane? A noninvasive study of the baroreflex in children anesthetized with sevoflurane versus halothane. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:360–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeleazcov C, Krajinovic L, Münster T, Birkholz T, Fried R, Schüttler J, Fechner J. Precision and accuracy of a new device (CNAPTM) for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring: assessment during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105:264–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorlas JC, Nijboer JA, Butijn WT, van der Hoeven GM, Settels JJ, Wesseling KH. Effects of peripheral vasoconstriction on the blood pressure in the finger, measured continuously by a new noninvasive method (the Finapres). Anesthesiol. 1985;62:342–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, Kipnis E, Onimus J, Robin E, Lebuffe G, Decoene C, Pruvot R, Vallet B. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:808–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Masson F, Sztark F. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:523–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar