Advertisement

Sensor Fusion Using a Hybrid Median Filter for Artifact Removal in Intraoperative Heart Rate Monitoring

  • Ping YangEmail author
  • Guy A. Dumont
  • J. Mark Ansermino
Article

Abstract

Objective

Intraoperative heart rate is routinely measured independently from the ECG monitor, pulse oximeter, and the invasive blood pressure monitor if available. The presence of artifacts, in one or more of theses signals, especially sustained artifacts, represents a critical challenge for physiological monitoring. When temporal filters are used to suppress sustained artifacts, unwanted delays or signal distortion are often introduced. The aim of this study was to remove artifacts and derive accurate estimates for the heart rate signal by using measurement redundancy.

Method

Heart rate measurements from multiple sensors and previous estimates that fall in a short moving window were treated as samples of the same heart rate. A hybrid median filter was used to align these samples into one ordinal series and to select the median as the fused estimate. This method can successfully remove artifacts that are sustained for shorter than half the length of the filter window, or artifacts that are sustained for a longer duration but presented in no more than half of the sensors.

Results

The method was tested on both simulated and clinical cases. The performance of the hybrid median filter in the simulated study was compared with that of a two-step estimation process, comprising a threshold-controlled artifact-removal module and a Kalman filter. The estimation accuracy of the hybrid median filter is better than that of the Kalman filter in the presence of artifacts.

Conclusions

The hybrid median filter combines the structural and temporal information from two or more sensors and generates a robust estimate of heart rate without requiring strict assumptions about the signal’s characteristics. This method is intuitive, computationally simple, and the performance can be easily adjusted. These considerable benefits make this method highly suitable for clinical use.

Keywords

Artifact removal Sensor fusion Heart rate Median filter Physiological monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank William Magruder for his valuable contribution when editing this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Takla G, Petre JH, Doyle DJ, Horibe M, Gopakumaran B. The problem of artifacts in patient monitor data during surgery: a clinical and methodological review. Anesth Analg 2006; 103(5): 1196–1204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hayes MJ, Smith PR. A new method for pulse oximetry possessing inherent insensitivity to artifact. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001; 48(4): 452–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGhee BH, Bridges MEJ. Monitoring arterial blood pressure: what you may not know. Crit Care Nurse 2002; 22(2): 66–70Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoare SW, Asbridge DD, Beatty PW. On-line novelty detection for artifact identification in automatic anaesthesia record keeping. Med Eng Phys 2002; 24:673–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ismail F, Davies M. Integrated monitoring and analysis for early warning of patient deterioration. Br J Anesth 2007; 98(1):149–152Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ebrahim MH, Feldman JM, Bar-Kana I. A robust sensor fusion method for heart rate estimation. J Clin Monit. 1997; 13(6):385–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harrison PJ, Stevens CF. Bayesian forecasting (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series B 1976; 38(3):205–247Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith AFM, West M. Monitoring renal transplants: an application of the multiprocess Kalman filter. Biometrics 1983; 39:867–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang P, Dumont GA, Ansermino JM. Adaptive change detection in heart rate trend monitoring in anesthetized children. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53(11):2211–2219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feldman JM, Ebrahim MH, Bar-Kana I. Robust sensor fusion improves heart rate estimation: clinical evaluation. J Clin Monit 1997; 13(6):379–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sitzman DA, Farrell RM. System and method for selecting physiological data from a plurality of physiological data sources. United States Patent 6801802, October 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and TherapeuticsThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations