A Knowledge Authoring Tool for Clinical Decision Support

  • Dustin Dunsmuir
  • Jeremy Daniels
  • Christopher Brouse
  • Simon Ford
  • J. Mark Ansermino
Article

Abstract

Anesthesiologists in the operating room are unable to constantly monitor all data generated by physiological monitors. They are further distracted by clinical and educational tasks. An expert system would ideally provide assistance to the anesthesiologist in this data-rich environment. Clinical monitoring expert systems have not been widely adopted, as traditional methods of knowledge encoding require both expert medical and programming skills, making knowledge acquisition difficult. A software application was developed for use as a knowledge authoring tool for physiological monitoring. This application enables clinicians to create knowledge rules without the need of a knowledge engineer or programmer. These rules are designed to provide clinical diagnosis, explanations and treatment advice for optimal patient care to the clinician in real time. By intelligently combining data from physiological monitors and demographical data sources the expert system can use these rules to assist in monitoring the patient. The knowledge authoring process is simplified by limiting connective relationships between rules. The application is designed to allow open collaboration between communities of clinicians to build a library of rules for clinical use. This design provides clinicians with a system for parameter surveillance and expert advice with a transparent pathway of reasoning. A usability evaluation demonstrated that anesthesiologists can rapidly develop useful rules for use in a predefined clinical scenario.

Keywords

Decision support Expert system Situation awareness Usability Anesthesia Monitoring Knowledge resources 

References

  1. 1.
    Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK Crisis management in anesthesiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ansermino JM. Patient safety: technology and design can help. B C Med J 2006; 48(7): 339–341Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller GA The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 1956; 101(2): 343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu J, Wyatt J, Altman D Decision tools in health care: focus on the problem, not the solution. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006; 6:4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hales BM, Pronovost PJ The checklist—a tool for error management and performance improvement. J Crit Care 2006; 21: 231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neily J, DeRosier JM, Mills PD, Bishop MJ, Weeks WB, Bagian JP Awareness and use of a cognitive aid for anesthesiology. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2007; 33: 502–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harrison TK, Manser T, Howard SK, Gaba DM Use of cognitive aids in a simulated anesthetic crisis. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 551–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Imhoff M, Kuhls S Alarm algorithms in critical care monitoring. Anesth Analg 2006; 102(5): 1525–1537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang P, Dumont G, Ansermino JM Adaptive change detection in heart rate trend monitoring in anesthetized children. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53(11): 2211–2219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang P, Dumont G, Lim J, Ansermino JM. Adaptive change point detection for respiratory variables. In: Proceedings of the EMBS 27th Annual International Conference, Shanghai, China, Sep 1–4, 2005; 780–783Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang P, Dumont G, Ansermino JM. An adaptive cusum test based on a hidden semi-Markov model for change detection in non-invasive mean blood pressure trend. In: Proceedings of the EMBS 28th Annual International Conference, New York City, USA, Aug 30–Sep 3, 2006; 3395–3398Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nabeshima K, Suzudo T, Seker S, Ayaz E, Barutcu B, Turkcan E, et al. On-line neuro-expert monitoring system for borssele nuclear power plant. Prog Nucl Energy 2003; 43(1): 397–404(8)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swain AD, Guttmann HE. Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Albuquerque (US-NM): Sandia National Labs; 1983Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schecke T, Langen M, Popp HJ, Rau G, Käsmacher H, Kalff G Knowledge-based decision support for patient monitoring in cardioanesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput 1993; 9(1): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krol M, Reich DL Development of a decision support system to assist anesthesiologists in operating room. J Med Syst 2000; 24(3):141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sukuvaara T, Makivirta A, Kari A, Koski E. An intelligent intensive care alarming system. Proc Comput Cardiol 1989; 225–228Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mersmann S, Dojat M. SmartCare – automated clinical guidelines in critical care. In: Mantara RL, Saitta L, eds, 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Valencia, Spain, Aug 22–27, 2004; 745–749Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knublauch H, Musen MA, Rector AL. Editing description logic ontologies with the protégé OWL plugin. In: Haarslev V, Möller R, eds, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics, June 6–8, 2004, Whistler, BC, Canada. Central Europe: CEUR Workshop Proceedings; 2004Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    IEEE-SA Standards Board. Health informatics—point-of-care medical device communication—part 10201: domain information model. 1st ed. USA: ISO/IEEE; 2004Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IEEE-SA Standards Board. Health informatics—point-of-care medical device communication—part 10101: nomenclature. 1st ed. USA: ISO/IEEE; 2004Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Drools Documentation. Accessed online at http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/4.0.3.15993.GA/html_single/index.html Nov 9, 2007
  22. 22.
    Takla G, Petre JH, Doyle DJ, Horibe M, Gopakumaran B The problem of artifacts in patient monitor data during surgery: a clinical and methodological review. Anesth Analg 2006; 103: 1196–1204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewis JR IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1995; 7: 57–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elevitch FR SNOMED CT: electronic health record enhances anesthesia patient safety. J Am Assoc Nurse Anesth 2005; 73(5): 361–366Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dustin Dunsmuir
    • 1
  • Jeremy Daniels
    • 1
  • Christopher Brouse
    • 2
  • Simon Ford
    • 1
  • J. Mark Ansermino
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and TherapeuticsThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Electrical and Computer EngineeringThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Pediatric AnesthesiaBritish Columbia Children’s HospitalVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations