A New Paradigm for the Design of Audible Alarms that Convey Urgency Information
- 188 Downloads
The current international standard (IEC 60601-1-8) stipulates that medical device audible alarms should be priority-encoded and validated for efficacy. Evidence suggests that the melodic alarms described in the standard are not functioning as originally intended. We present a multi-disciplinary, human factors paradigm for audible alarm development whereby urgency information is encoded via modulation of the physical characteristics of sounds. We also test the feasibility of this approach using information measures.
We designed series of experimental sounds that varied along controlled physical and acoustical dimensions. Subjects rated these sound series for perceived urgency. Based on these ratings, selected sounds from each series were assigned a␣priority category from ‹low’ to ‹high’ – we call these resulting sets of sounds ‹urgency-codecs’. The method of categorical judgments (based on information theory) was used to compare each urgency-codec for ability to convey urgency information.
Subjects were consistent in their ratings of the three series of experimental sounds for perceived urgency. The urgency data pertaining to one of the series (harmonic interval) was successfully fit to a psychophysical empirical law. The urgency-codec derived from another sound series (melodic interval) was found to have the highest signal (correct interpretation of urgency level by subjects) transmission rate.
The proposed paradigm is feasible, and it offers an evidence-based strategy for alarm sound design and testing. This approach would be performed before implementation of new alarm sounds in clinical settings, and should result in development of alarm sounds that satisfy the requirements of priority-encoding and validation.
Keywordsalarm sounds alarms urgency urgency matching urgency mismatch anesthesia monitoring medical monitoring medical device human factors standardization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Stanton NA, Edworthy J Auditory warnings, displays: an overview. In: Stanton NA, Edworthy J, eds Human factors in auditory warnings. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 1999: 3–30Google Scholar
- 2.Patterson RD Auditory warning systems for high-workload environments. Ergonom Internat 1985; 85: 163–165Google Scholar
- 3.Edworthy J Urgency mapping in auditory warning signals. In: Stanton NA ed Human factors in alarm design. London: Taylor and Francis, 1994, 15–31Google Scholar
- 6.Meredith C, Edworthy J Sources of confusion in intensive therapy unit alarms. In: Stanton N, ed Human factors in alarm design. London: Taylor and Francis, 1994, 207–219Google Scholar
- 11.Medical electrical equipment-Part 1-8: General requirements, tests and guidance for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems. International Electrotechnical Committee 60601-1-8:2003(E)Google Scholar
- 12.Stanton NA, Booth RT The psychology of alarms. In: Lovesey EJ, ed Contemporary ergonomics. London: Taylor and Francis, 1990, pp 378–383Google Scholar
- 14.Bye A, Berg O, Owre F Operator support systems for status identification and alarm processing at the OECD Halden Reactor Project – experiences and perspective for future development. In: Stanton NA, ed Human factors in alarm design. London: Taylor & Francis, 1994Google Scholar
- 16.Marshall E, Baker S Alarms in nuclear power plant control rooms: current approaches and future design. In: Stanton NA, ed Human factors in alarm design. London: Taylor & Francis, 1994Google Scholar
- 17.Stanton NA Alarm initiated activities. In: Stanton NA, ed Human factors in alarm design. London: Taylor & Francis, 1994Google Scholar
- 19.Xiao Y, Mackenzie CF, Jaberi M, Harper B, LOTAS group Alarms: silenced, ignored and missed. Anesthesiology 1996;73:995–1021Google Scholar
- 31.Sanderson P, Wee A, Seah E, Lacherez P. Auditory alarms, medical standards, and urgency. In: Stockman T, Nickerson LV, Frauenberger C, Edwards ADN, Brock D, eds, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Auditory Display. London: International Conference on Auditory Display, 2006Google Scholar
- 33.Norwich KH. Information of events with discrete outcomes: methods of communication theory and psychology. In: Information, sensation and perception. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., 2003: 34–49Google Scholar