DFT and QTAIM Study of Intramolecular and Intermolecular Fe–Hδ−···Hδ+–O Dihydrogen Bonds
- 171 Downloads
The geometric structures of three recently discovered iron complexes with one intramolecular and two intermolecular Fe–Hδ−···Hδ+–O dihydrogen bonds are optimized using the density functional theory. Then the topology of electron densities and charge distributions in optimized structures were analyzed using Bader’s quantum theory of atoms in molecules method. The Hδ−···Hδ+ distances in three optimized structures are 1.415, 1.549 and 1.608 Å, respectively, much shorter than the H···H distances of 1.7–2.2 Å in most M–H···H–X dihydrogen bonds discovered so far. The corresponding electron densities at the bond critical points between those Hδ−···Hδ+ pairs are 0.047, 0.031, and 0.029, respectively. Such short Hδ−···Hδ+ distances and high electron density between Hδ− and Hδ+ indicate that the Fe–Hδ−···Hδ+–O bonds have unusually strong interactions between hydridic Feδ+–Hδ− hydrogen and protonic Oδ−–Hδ+ hydrogen. Selected molecular orbitals that show the H···H interactions are also analyzed. Quantum theory of atoms in molecules analysis indicates that the intramolecular Fe–Hδ−···Hδ+–O dihydrogen bonds with a Hδ−···Hδ+ distance of 1.415 Å is much stronger than those two intermolecular dihydrogen bonds.
KeywordsDihydrogen bond Iron Hydrogenase Density functional theory Quantum theory of atoms in molecules
This work was supported by the Molecular Graphics and Computation Facility (Dr. Kathleen A. Durkin, Director) in the College of Chemistry at University of California, Berkeley, and by the US National Science Foundation (CHE-0840505) for the computational devices.
- 1.S. J. Grabowski (ed.) Hydrogen Bonding—New Insights (Springer, Dordrecht, 2006).Google Scholar
- 2.G. A. Jeffrey and W. Saenger (eds.) Hydrogen Bonding in Biology and Chemistry (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991).Google Scholar
- 3.M. P. Brown and R. W. Heseltine (1968). Chem. Commun. 1551.Google Scholar
- 4.M. P. Brown, R. W. Heseltine, P. A. Smith, and P. J. Walker (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A 410.Google Scholar
- 23.M. A. Rida and A. K. Smith, in J. Leigh and N. Winterton (eds.), Modern Coordination Chemistry: The Legacy of Joseph Chatt (The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2002), 31–44 pp.Google Scholar
- 24.R. F. W. Bader Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory (Clarendon, Oxford, 1990).Google Scholar
- 25.M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N. Staroverov, T. Keith, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, R. L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V. G. Zakrzewski, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, O. Farkas, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, and D. J. Fox, Gaussian 09, Revision C.01 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2010).Google Scholar
- 31.T. A. Keith, AIMAll Version 11.12.19, (TK Gristmill Software, Overland Park, KS, USA, 2011).Google Scholar
- 32.J. Manson, C. E. Webster, and M. B. Hall, JIMP2, version 0.091, a free program for visualizing and manipulating molecules, (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2006).Google Scholar