Efficacy and Safety of Hizentra®, a New 20% Immunoglobulin Preparation for Subcutaneous Administration, in Pediatric Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency
- First Online:
- 1k Downloads
Subcutaneous IgG treatment for primary immunodeficiencies (PI) is particularly well suited for children because it does not require venous access and is mostly free of systemic adverse events (AEs). In a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase III study, 18 children and five adolescents with PI were switched from previous intravenous (IVIG) or subcutaneous (SCIG) IgG treatment to receive dose-equivalent, weekly subcutaneous infusions of Hizentra® for 40 weeks. Mean IgG trough levels were maintained in patients previously on SCIG, or increased in those previously on IVIG, regardless of age. No serious bacterial infections were reported during the efficacy period of the study. The rates of non-serious infections were 4.77 (children) and 5.18 (adolescents) infections per patient per year. Related AEs were observed in seven children (38.9%) and two adolescents (40%). Three serious AEs and two AEs leading to discontinuation (all unrelated) were reported in children. Hizentra® is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for pediatric patients.
KeywordsSubcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) primary immunodeficiency local tolerability serum IgG levels pediatric patients
Primary immunodeficiency (PI) disorders, such as common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), are often diagnosed in childhood and require life-long replacement therapy with intravenous (IVIG) or subcutaneous (SCIG) IgG [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Patients with PI are predisposed to recurrent respiratory, skin, or gastrointestinal infections that may lead to chronic damage. IgG replacement is an effective therapy, usually administered intravenously [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Subcutaneous IgG administration, which is an increasingly widely used alternative, is particularly suitable for children, as it does not require venous access and is mostly free of systemic adverse events (AEs) [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Moreover, compared to adults, children require lower volumes for the infusion of prescribed doses, which makes them well suited for SCIG therapy.
Therapy with the newly developed, highly concentrated SCIG products can be easily integrated into daily activities, thus offering patients more flexibility. Hizentra® (IgPro20, approved in the USA in March 2010) is a new 20% liquid formulation with stability at 25°C for at least 24 months, which has high purity and proven pathogen safety [18, 19, 20]. Hizentra® can be administered at relatively high infusion rates, which, together with low infusion volumes, contributes to potentially short infusion times.
In this prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase III study (NCT00542997), the efficacy and tolerability of Hizentra® were evaluated in patients switched from previous IVIG or SCIG therapy at equivalent doses . The rationale for using SCIG doses equivalent to previous IVIG or SCIG dosing was based on the European experience showing that SCIG administered at doses equivalent to IVIG is sufficient to achieve comparable IgG trough levels in patients with PI. This approach is reflected in the European Medicines Agency requirement to show that equivalent serum IgG levels can be achieved with the same doses . Here we report efficacy and safety results in pediatric patients in comparison with adults.
Patients and Methods
Eighteen children (2–11 years) and five adolescents (12–15 years) with CVID, XLA, or autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia were enrolled in the study. Major inclusion criteria were stable IVIG therapy at regular 3- or 4-week intervals or weekly SCIG therapy for at least 6 months before study start, at a monthly dose of 0.2 to 0.8 g/kg body weight (bw), and at least three documented serum IgG trough levels of ≥5 g/L. Patients who had never been treated with immunoglobulin replacement therapy were excluded from the study. Patients were also excluded if they had any condition that was likely to interfere with evaluation of the study medication or satisfactory conduct of the study. Detailed description of inclusion and exclusion criteria is given elsewhere .
This study was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol and all other study-related documents were reviewed and approved by the appropriate local Independent Ethics Committees. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or patients’ parents or legal guardians.
This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase III study with a 12-week wash-in/wash-out period followed by a 28-week efficacy period . A pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy was conducted in week 28 ± 1, in which nine children and three adolescents participated.
The primary objective of this study was to show that sustained serum IgG levels can be achieved with IgG doses comparable to previous IgG treatment. Individual IgG doses were equivalent to previous IVIG or SCIG doses, with weekly administrations. Dose adjustments were made in the wash-in/wash-out period in case IgG trough levels were <5 g/L.
Premedication prior to infusion for alleviating AEs was not allowed. Oral and parenteral steroids were allowed if the average daily dose was <0.15 mg of prednisone equivalent per kilogram per day. Local anesthetics could be used before infusion to reduce the pain associated with needle insertion if required.
Hizentra® was administered subcutaneously using infusion pumps in sites on the abdomen, thighs, and/or lateral hip . Infusion techniques varied according to local practice and patients already on SCIG treatment continued with their established infusion technique. The maximal volume per injection site was limited to 25 mL. The infusion rate per site was not to exceed 35 mL/h during the efficacy period, depending on tolerability. Several infusions were performed under supervision at the study site, the rest were administered at home by the patient or patient’s parent/guardian.
Efficacy and Safety Assessments
The primary efficacy objective was achievement of IgG trough levels at six consecutive weeks at steady state (Infusions 12 to 17) similar to three pre-study IgG trough levels (during the last 3 to 6 months prior to the study). Trough serum IgG levels were measured before Infusions 1, 4, 8, 12–17, 20, and every fourth infusion thereafter.
Secondary efficacy endpoints included rate of clinically documented serious bacterial infections (SBIs), number of infection episodes, number of days missed from school/day care or unable to perform normal activities due to infections (abbreviated further as number of days missed from school/day care), number of days of hospitalization due to infections, and use of antibiotics for infection prophylaxis or treatment. SBIs (bacterial pneumonia, bacteremia/septicemia, osteomyelitis/septic arthritis, bacterial meningitis, and visceral abscess) were diagnosed using pre-defined criteria adjusted to both adult and pediatric patients . Non-serious infections were diagnosed at the discretion of the Investigators according to the national standard of medical practice.
Maximal serum IgG concentration (Cmax), time to reaching Cmax (Tmax), and area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) until the last measured concentration were evaluated. Blood samples for IgG determination were taken before Infusion 28, 10 ± 5 min prior to end of infusion, 2 ± 1 h after infusion, and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 days.
Information about AEs was collected continuously. Patients or their guardians documented any findings in patient diaries and Investigators evaluated them at visits. For the analysis of local reactions, 25 preferred terms of the category “General disorders and administration site conditions” were combined in the category of local reactions. Local tolerability was assessed by the patients within 24 to 72 h after infusion and reviewed by the investigator during visits. Standard hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis laboratory parameters were determined at screening, before Infusions 1, 4, 28, and at the completion visit.
Efficacy analyses were carried out on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (17 children, five adolescents, and 24 adults) defined as all patients who were treated with Hizentra® during the efficacy period (starting from week 13). Safety analyses were carried out on the all-treated population (18 children and five adolescents) defined as all patients who were treated with Hizentra® during any study period. PK analyses were carried out on the per-protocol pharmacokinetic population (nine children and three adolescents) comprising all patients who had received uniformly repeated weekly doses of Hizentra® at least 12 weeks before week 28 ± 1, with not more than three missing samples or outliers in the AUC sampling period.
For primary efficacy analyses, six consecutive steady-state IgG trough values were aggregated to the patient’s median value. The same procedure was used for the three most recent IgG trough values ≥5 g/L from the previous treatment . A post hoc analysis with point estimates and a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the change from pre-study serum IgG levels was performed using the Hodges–Lehmann nonparametric analysis.
The rate of SBIs per patient per year was estimated with a 99% upper confidence limit (CL), and the number of infection episodes was estimated with a two-sided 95% CI. Other secondary endpoints were summarized with descriptive statistics. AUC was obtained by the trapezoidal rule between the first and last IgG measurement, ignoring outliers.
Adverse events were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 12.0. Temporally associated AEs were defined as occurring between the start of infusion and 72 h after the end of infusion.
All 23 pediatric patients screened were enrolled in the study. Two of these discontinued due to unrelated adverse events (after week 2 and after week 36). The remaining 21 pediatric patients completed the study. Of 28 adults enrolled, 22 completed the study.
Demographic and baseline characteristics (AT population)
N = 18
N = 5
N = 28
Gender, n (%)
CVID, n (%)
XLA, n (%)
ARAG, n (%)
Study Drug Administration
All patients in the ITT population received the intended 12 infusions during the wash-in/wash-out period. Most patients received the planned 40 infusions during the study: 16 children (94%), five adolescents (80%), and 17 (71%) adults. Five adults (21%) received 41 infusions.
The mean (SD) of individual median Hizentra® doses per week for the entire study period was 129.9 (46.2) mg/kg bw in children (range, 76–262 mg/kg bw) and 113.7 (28.0) mg/kg bw in adolescents (range, 72–150 mg/kg bw), both very similar to the dose of 114.3 (27.6) mg/kg bw administered in adults (range, 59–189 mg/kg bw).
Dose increases of >10% of the planned dose were made in four children and one adolescent during the wash-in/wash-out period. One child and one adolescent had dose decreases of >10%. Dose adjustments in adults were not necessary.
The mean of the individual median infusion rates was lower in children (19.0 mL/h) compared to adolescents and adults (31.2 and 28.5 mL/h, respectively). The median duration of infusion per week was 0.78 h (range, 0.3–2.5 h) in children and 1.0 h (range, 0.5–2.5 h) in adolescents, which was lower than that in adults (1.42 h; range, 0.7–3.3 h) because of the higher total dose administered in adults.
Primary Efficacy Endpoint
The study objective was met: Hizentra® treatment resulted in serum IgG trough levels comparable to or higher than those achieved with previous therapy. The mean of the individual pre-study median IgG trough level in children was 6.94 g/L, and in adolescents, 7.99 g/L compared with 7.81 g/L in adults (Table III). The mean of the individual median IgG trough levels measured before Infusions 12 to 17 were 7.86 g/L in children, and 7.91 g/L in adolescents compared with 8.31 g/L in adults, suggesting that IgG levels were maintained in all age groups.
A post hoc statistical analysis of the change from baseline in serum IgG trough levels confirmed that IgG levels were maintained in adolescents and adults, and increased in children. For the efficacy period of the study (Infusions 12–17), the mean change from baseline in IgG levels was most pronounced in children (0.920 g/L), with a Hodges–Lehmann point estimate for the change from baseline of 0.680 g/L. The two-sided 95% CI for this change (0.030, 1.500) suggested a significant difference in IgG levels from pre-study level to the level achieved during the efficacy period. The corresponding change from baseline in adolescents and adults indicated stable IgG levels and no significant difference from pre-study to study IgG levels (Table III). Similar results were obtained for the entire study period (Infusions 12–41). A significant increase in IgG levels from baseline was observed in children, while the IgG levels in the other age groups remained stable (Table III).
In a robustness analysis of IgG trough values excluding the seven pediatric patients who had dose adjustments, no relevant difference was observed compared to the analysis for the ITT population.
Nine children and three adolescents participated in the PK substudy. There were no clinically relevant differences between children, adolescents, and adults (n = 11) in the PK parameters for serum IgG.
PK parameters by age group (PPK population)
N = 9
N = 3
N = 11
Cmax (g/L), mean (SD)
Tmax (day), median (range)
AUC (day × g/L), mean (SD)
Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
Efficacy endpoints (ITT population)
N = 17
N = 5
N = 24
IgG trough levels
Mean ± SD
6.94 ± 1.223
7.99 ± 1.946
7.81 ± 1.666
Infusions 12–17a, e
Mean ± SD
7.86 ± 1.720
7.91 ± 1.432
8.31 ± 1.250
Mean ± SD
7.78 ± 1.510
8.14 ± 1.390
8.32 ± 1.211
Number (%) of patientsb
Number of events (annual rate per patient)
[upper 99% CL]
Number (%) of patientsb
Number of events (annual rate per patient)
Days missed from school/day care
Number (%) of patientsc
Number of days (annual rate per patient)
Days hospitalized due to infection
Number (%) of patientsc
Number of days (annual rate per patient)
Days with antibiotics for infection prophylaxis or treatment
Number (%) of patientsb
Number of days (annual rate per patient)
Although the annual rate of all infections (including SBIs) in children was slightly lower than in adults (4.77 vs. 5.47 infections per patient per year; Table III), no age-related trends in the incidence of specific types of infection were observed. The most frequent type of infection was cough (seven events in children and six events in adolescents), followed by upper respiratory tract infection (eight events in children and two events in adolescents) and bronchitis (four events in children only).
Eight children missed 139 days from school/day care and three children spent a total of 78 days in hospital (Table III). Of these, the child with recurrent pneumonia missed 71 days from school and spent 63 days in hospital. This child’s experience differed substantially from that of the other patients in the study, regardless of age. Therefore, a post hoc analysis excluding this child was performed to evaluate the efficacy in patients with less severe disease (Table III). In comparison, four adolescents missed only 5 days and none was hospitalized, while eight adults missed 54 days and one adult spent 8 days in hospital. Treatment with antibiotics for prophylaxis or against infections was prescribed to 11 children (442 days) and one adolescent (1 day). The child with recurrent pneumonia was treated for 182 days. Excluding this child, the rate of days on antibiotics in children was twofold lower than the one in adults (Table III).
Safety and Tolerability
Local reactions (AT population)
N = 18
N = 5
N = 28
Ni = 678
Ni = 199
Ni = 954
Total, no. of AEs (rate per infusion)
Mild local reactions, no. of AEs (rate per infusion)
Moderate local reactions, no. of AEs (rate per infusion)
Infusion site nodule
Infusion site pruritus
Infusion site swelling
Infusion site inflammation
Infusion site pain
Infusion site reaction
Severe local reactions, no. of AEs (rate per infusion)
Infusion site pruritus
Patients or their guardians evaluated the local tolerability as “very good” or “good” for 98.5% of the infusions in children; a rating of “fair” or “poor” was given only for five (0.7%) and two (0.3%) infusions, respectively. In adolescents, local tolerability was rated as “very good” or “good” for 95.5% of the infusions and “fair” for nine (4.5%) infusions. Local tolerability assessments in adults were similar to those in pediatric patients: 95.5% of the infusions were rated as “very good” or “good,” 4.0% as “fair,” and 0.4% as “poor.”
Overall Adverse Events
Summary of adverse events including local reactions (AT population)
N = 18
N = 5
N = 28
Ni = 678
Ni = 199
Ni = 954
Patients with AEs, n (%)
Patients with related AEs, n (%)
Patients with temporally associated AEs (72 h), n (%)
Patients with related, temporally associated AEs (72 h), n (%)
Patients with serious AEs, n (%)
Patients discontinued due to AEs, n (%)
Patients discontinued due to related AEs, n (%)
The rates of AEs, excluding local reactions, were similar in all age groups: 107 AEs occurred during 678 infusions in children (rate 0.158 AEs per infusion) and 41 AEs occurred during 199 infusions in adolescents (rate 0.206 AEs per infusion), compared with 269 AEs during 954 infusions in adults (0.282 AEs per infusion). Excluding local reactions, the most common AEs in children were cough and upper respiratory tract infection (12 and 10 events, respectively; rates 0.018 and 0.015 events per infusion); in adolescents, cough was the most common AE (eight events, rate 0.040).
The rates of temporally associated AEs other than local reactions were somewhat lower in pediatric patients than in adults: 0.090 AEs per infusion in children and 0.085 AEs per infusion in adolescents, compared with 0.148 AEs per infusion in adults. The most common temporally associated AEs were respiratory infections, such as cough, upper respiratory tract infection, and bronchitis.
The frequency of related AEs was lower in children and adolescents than in adults. Excluding local reactions, 20 related AEs were reported in children and four in adolescents (rates 0.029 and 0.020 AEs per infusion, respectively). Excluding local reactions and infections, the most common related AEs in children were pruritus (six events, rate 0.009 events per infusion), erythema (three events, rate 0.004 events per infusion), and psychomotor hyperactivity (three events, rate 0.004 events per infusion). Two related events of headache were reported in children (rate 0.003 events per infusion). In adolescents, the only related AE reported more than once was pruritus (three events, rate 0.015 events per infusion). Adults experienced more related AEs, which were neither local reactions nor infections, the most frequent being headache (11 events, rate 0.012 events per infusion), fatigue (five events, rate 0.005 events per infusion), and pruritus (five events, rate 0.005 events per infusion).
Almost all AEs, excluding local reactions, were mild or moderate in intensity: 95.3% in children and 97.6% in adolescents. Five patients experienced six severe AEs (chest pain, C-reactive protein increased, appendicitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, and cough). In adults, no severe AEs were reported.
Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation
No deaths occurred during the study. Serious AEs and AEs leading to discontinuation (all unrelated) were reported only in children.
Three children (16.7%) experienced five SAEs, none of them related to study medication. A 5-year-old girl with a diagnosis of CVID experienced three SAEs: one event of pyrexia and two events of X-ray proven pneumonia. The first event of pneumonia, occurring in the wash-in/wash-out period, was moderate in intensity and was considered an SBI according to the pre-specified FDA criteria because chest X-ray/CT scan showed distinctive nodular and new infiltrative changes in both lungs, despite negative sputum and blood cultures. Approximately a month later, when the patient was hospitalized for diagnostic purposes, bronchoalveolar lavage was positive for atypical mycobacteria in polymerase chain reaction test. Tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis were negative. With appropriate antibiotic treatment, this SBI resolved after 34 days without sequelae. Four days after Infusion 14, during the efficacy period, the patient experienced pyrexia that was reported as an SAE of moderate intensity; after treatment with antibiotics and ibuprofen, the event resolved after 2 days without sequelae. Four days after Infusion 22, the patient experienced pneumonia that was reported as an SAE of severe intensity. She had fever and cough, and her laboratory tests were indicative of an ongoing inflammatory process (white blood cells 25.69 × 109; C-reactive protein 31.8 mg/L; hemoglobin 9.7 g/dL; ALT 13.1 U/L). Because of the underlying lung disease and medical history of recurrent pneumonia, this event was an acute exacerbation of the existing pneumonia, and thus not considered an additional SBI. The patient completed the study as planned. Two other SAEs—diarrhea (mild) experienced by a 7-year-old girl and appendicitis (severe) experienced by a 10-year-old girl—resolved without sequelae after 2 and 5 days, respectively.
After Infusion 2, an 8-year-old boy with XLA discontinued because of myalgia, pyrexia, and nausea (moderate intensity), and chest pain and C-reactive protein increased (severe intensity). All these AEs were considered unrelated to study medication and resolved without sequelae. The patient was diagnosed with cystic lymphangioma, and thoracic surgery was performed. A 5-year-old boy with XLA discontinued because of anemia of moderate intensity occurring after Infusion 32. The patient had suffered from anemia for 1 year before entering the study and had low hemoglobin values throughout the study (≤10.1 g/dL), as well as abnormally low values for hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, and mean corpuscular volume at all measurements. The AE was considered unrelated to study medication and was ongoing at final assessment.
Laboratory tests were unremarkable. Median values and ranges of hematology and serum chemistry variables did not show any relevant changes over time. Individual hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis values lying outside the normal range were considered by the investigator as not clinically significant in all but two patients. A 10-year-old girl with a history of anemia had low values for hemoglobin, hematocrit, and mean corpuscular volume at most measurements during the study. She was diagnosed with mild iron deficiency anemia that was unrelated to study treatment and resolved without sequelae after 95 days. The 5-year-old boy who discontinued because of anemia had low values for hematocrit, hemoglobin, and several other hematology tests before Infusion 28 and at the completion visit, and a high platelet count at the completion visit.
This is the first report of Hizentra® treatment in pediatric patients with PI at doses equivalent to those in previous therapy. Sustained IgG levels were achieved at equivalent SCIG doses compared with previous IVIG or SCIG therapy, and thus the primary objective of this study was met. A statistically significant increase in IgG levels from baseline was observed in children. Children and adolescents responded well to therapy and even achieved greater improvements in some endpoints compared with adults.
IgG trough levels achieved with equivalent doses were similar to or higher than those with previous therapy, suggesting that frequent subcutaneous administration contributed to stabilization of serum IgG levels. In particular, Hizentra® treatment resulted in an increase of 22.4% in IgG trough levels in children who had been previously treated with equivalent IVIG doses. The mean IgG trough levels in adolescents, most of whom had been treated with SCIG previously, were maintained at levels between 6.2 and 9.5 g/L, which are considered sufficient for protection against infections [24, 25, 26]. Similar IgG trough levels have been published previously in pediatric patients treated with IVIG or SCIG preparations. At monthly IgG doses of 200–741 mg/kg, serum IgG trough concentrations of 5.68–14.51 g/L in children and 8.2–13.9 g/L in adolescents were reported in a study of Privigen®, a 10% IVIG . Mean IgG trough levels achieved with Vivaglobin®, a 16% SCIG, in children aged 2–11 years, were 9.2 (±2.4) g/L . IgG trough levels obtained with other subcutaneous preparations were similar (5.2–9.6 g/L ) or were reported to be in the normal range [27, 28]. In a study of IVIG, 31 children with agammaglobulinemia achieved serum IgG levels between 5 and 11.4 g/L . Thus, Hizentra® therapy normalized IgG levels similarly in all patients, regardless of their age.
The overall efficacy, assessed by the rate of infections and associated treatments, was similar in pediatric patients and adults. Therefore, SCIG therapy can be used for the treatment of PI from early childhood. The rates of all infections, including SBIs, were similar in all age groups and comparable to previously reported rates for IVIG or SCIG treatments [9, 12, 30]. The number of days missed from school, days spent in hospital, and days on antibiotics was influenced markedly by the experience of the child with recurrent pneumonia. The rates of these efficacy endpoints in the other patients were within the range of reported results [9, 12, 30, 31, 32].
An important observation in this study was that children tolerated SCIG administration well, with no difference to adolescents or adults. With respect to local reactions, pediatric patients even showed better tolerability compared to adults, with rates markedly lower than the rates observed in adults. In our experience beyond the scope of this study, the infusion of smaller volumes of the 20% SCIG yielded better local tolerability compared to the available 16% and 16.5% SCIG preparations.
As SCIG therapy could help minimize the impact of chronic disease on patients’ and families’ active lives without compromising therapy, it is particularly suitable for children. Only two children discontinued this study, with none withdrawing consent, suggesting that self-administration was accepted well. Because children need lower infusion volumes to administer the required IgG doses, Hizentra® infusions were relatively short (in general, less than an hour) and could be easily integrated in normal daily routine, without a negative impact on patients’ quality of life. This observation is in line with the results of previous studies showing quality of life improvement in PI children with SCIG therapy [33, 34]. Considering the problematic venous access in young children, it is much more practicable to use a subcutaneous way of administration in this age group. Therapy by the subcutaneous route obviates also the use of premedication, which is an additional benefit, as shown here and in previous studies . In addition, subcutaneous infusions are administered with much smaller needles than intravenous infusions, and the small pumps used could be comfortably carried on the body if necessary. Frequent administration (two to seven times a week) of small volumes is another option for reducing the time for each infusion for more flexibility, and may be a further option for patients as was shown in a recent retrospective study . Most importantly, SCIG therapy offers a broad variety of administration options, enabling each patient to find their preferred treatment regimen. Children at school age are more active than adults, and would feel better integrated in their environment if they did not have to miss activities due to their therapy.
In conclusion, Hizentra® is effective in maintaining or increasing IgG trough levels and in protecting pediatric patients from infections. No pediatric-specific dose requirement was necessary to achieve the desired serum IgG level. Hizentra® was well tolerated, with respect to both systemic and local reactions. The short infusion duration and the lack of severe local reactions favor self-administration, which appears to be widely accepted by patents and their families.
This study was supported by CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors. The assistance of Corinna Miede and Cordula Massion from Accovion GmbH for the statistical analyses is gratefully appreciated. The authors thank Dr. Andrea Sebald and Dr. Jeff Baggish for critical review of the manuscript. We also acknowledge the editorial assistance of Phocus Services Ltd supported by CSL Behring.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Dr. Borte reports consultant fees from CSL Behring and Baxter, and honoraria for lectures from CSL Behring, Baxter, and Octapharma; Dr. Gonzalez-Quevedo, sponsorship for educational purposes and clinical trial support from CSL Behring; Dr. Grimbacher is a member of the IgPro20 Steering Committee and Advisory Boards, honoraria for presentations from Baxter and Grifols; Dr. Jolles, clinical trial support from CSL Behring, Baxter, and Octapharma, consultant fees from Baxter and Octapharma; and Dr. Zenker and J. Neufang-Hueber are employees of CSL Behring. No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.
- 4.Ochs HD, Smith CIE, Puck JM. Primary immunodeficiency diseases: a molecular and genetic approach. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, USA; 2007.Google Scholar
- 11.Eijkhout HW, van der Meer JW, Kallenberg CG, Weening RS, van Dissel JT, Sanders LA, et al. The effect of two different dosages of intravenous immunoglobulin on the incidence of recurrent infections in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter crossover trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:165–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Jolles S, Bernatowska E, de Gracia J, Borte M, Cristea V, Peter HH, et al. Efficacy and safety of Hizentra® in patients with primary immunodeficiency after a dose-equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy. Clin Immunol. 2011 (in press)Google Scholar
- 22.European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP). Note for guidance on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for subcutaneous and intramuscular use. EMEA/CPMP/BPWG/282/00. 2002Google Scholar
- 23.FDA. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic studies to support marketing of immune globulin intravenous (human) as replacement therapy for primary humoral immunodeficiency. Guidance for industry. 2008.Google Scholar
- 25.Orange JS, Hossny EM, Weiler CR, Ballow M, Berger M, Bonilla FA, et al. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence by members of the Primary Immunodeficiency Committee of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:S525–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar