Autoantibodies to Mitotic Apparatus: Association with Other Autoantibodies and Their Clinical Significance
- 280 Downloads
The most important mitotic apparatus (MA) antigens are centrosome (CE), nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA-1, NuMA-2), midbody, and centromere F (CENP-F). We studied associations of anti-MA antibodies with other autoantibodies and their clinical significance. A total of 6270 patients were studied for the presence of anti-MA antibodies on HEp-2 cells. Sera positive for anti-MA were tested for anti-extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) antibodies. Anti-MA antibodies were detected in 56 (45 females and 11 males) of 6270 sera (0.9%). Of these 56, NuMA-1 was found in 23, NuMA-2 in 7, CE in 20, CENP-F in 5, and CENP-F/centrosome in 1 case. Anti-NuMA-1 were associated with anti-ENA antibodies (p < 0.001). Diagnoses were established in 43/56 patients: 22 connective tissue diseases, 7 infections, 6 autoimmune hepatitis, 3 vasculitis, 3 primary antiphospholipid syndrome, 1 malignancy, and 1 fever of unknown origin. The differential diagnosis of anti-NuMA-1-positive patients must include Sjögren’s syndrome, while patients with anti-CE antibodies must be observed for HCV infection.
KEY WORDS:Mitotic apparatus NuMA ENA HCV Sjögren’s syndrome
This study was supported in part by Ministry of Science of the Republic of Serbia, Grant No. 145032 Dj.
- 1.Fritzler MJ, Rattner JB: Autoantibodies to the mitotic apparatus: Biological breakthroughs, clinical application, etiological complexity. In Autoantigens and Autoantibodies: Diagnostic Tools and Clues to Understanding Autoimmunity, K Conrad, RL Humbel, et al. (eds). Berlin, Pabst Science, 2000, pp 58–86Google Scholar
- 4.Bradwell AR, Hughes RG, Harden EL: Atlas of HE-p 2 Patterns. Birmingham, Drapkins, 2003Google Scholar
- 9.Huidbuchel E, Blaschek M, Seigneurin JM, Lamour A, Berthelot JM, Youinou P: Anti-organelle and anti-cytoskeletal autoantibodies in the serum of Epstein-Barr virus-infected patients. Ann Med Intern (Paris) 142:343–346, 1991Google Scholar
- 12.Sharp GC: Diagnostic criteria for classification of MCTD. In Mixed Connective Tissue Diseases and Antinuclear Antibodies, R Kasukawa, GC Sharp (eds). Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1987, pp 23–32Google Scholar
- 14.Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, Daniels TE, Fox PC, Fox RI, Kassan SS, Pillemer SR, Talal N, Weisman MH: European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjogren’s Syndrome. Classification criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome: A revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis 61:554–558, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, Lockshin MD, Branch DW, Piette JC, Brey R, Derksen R, Harris EN, Hughes GR, Triplett DA, Khamashta MA: International consensus statement on preliminary classification for definite antiphospholipid syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 42:1309–1311, 1999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Radice A, Vecchi M, Bianchi MB, Sinico RA: Contribution of immunoflorescence to the identification and characterization of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies. The role of different fixatives. Clin Exp Rheum 18:707–1712, 2000Google Scholar