Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 165–195

Long-term size-segregated particle (PM10, PM2.5, PM1) characterization study at Melpitz -- influence of air mass inflow, weather conditions and season

  • G. Spindler
  • A. Grüner
  • K. Müller
  • S. Schlimper
  • H. Herrmann
Article

Abstract

Size-segregated high-volume (HV) quartz filter samples were collected daily at the Melpitz rural site in Germany for PM10 (November 1992 until April 2012), and for PM2.5 and PM1 (January 2003 until April 2012, PM1 sampled every sixth day). The samples were analysed for mass concentration (gravimetrically), water-soluble ions (ion-chromatography) and since 2003 for organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) (thermography). The long-term measurements first show a decreasing trend for PM10 (1993–2000) followed by a second period (2001–2011) with a mean mass concentration of about 22.4 μgm−3 and an inter-annual variation of about ± 2.9 μgm−3 (13% fluctuation margin). The absolute sulphate and calcium concentration (for the full period), as well as the EC concentration (time after 2003) decrease by about 50, 75 and 30% for PM10, respectively. The nitrate concentration remains constant all the time. For the daily objective weather type classification (OWTC, 1993–2002) the highest PM10 concentration was found for South-East (SE) and the lowest for North-West (NW) wind direction with 44 and 24 μgm−3, respectively. These concentrations decrease for 2003–2011 in comparison to 1993–2002 by about 21% and 26%, respectively. The highest PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 concentrations (2003–2011) were found for SE and the lowest for NW wind direction with about 34 and 17 μgm−3 (PM10), 28 and 19 μgm−3 (PM2.5) and 22 and 11 μgm−3 (PM1), respectively. The relative content of sulphate, OC and EC was the highest for SE wind direction. A differentiation into four categories for winter (Wi) and summer (Su) and air mass inflow from West (W) and East (E) was carried out. The highest PM concentrations were observed for WiE with the highest inter-annual fluctuation. In this category sulphate contents are largest. The lowest concentrations where found for SuW. The means for WiE show the strongest relative decreases, e.g. in PM10 sulphate (1993–2011) and EC (2003–2011) by about 60% and 40%, respectively. Nitrate is an indicator for NOx motor-car emissions. It shows a typical variation with maximum values in the middle of the week, especially for air mass inflow from West. In contrast, chloride mostly originating from sea spray doesn’t show such a concentration pattern. The PM2.5/PM10 as well the PM1/PM10-ratio have the highest median (0.878 and 0.654) during WiE and the lowest (0.718 and 0.578) during SuW, respectively. For the ratio PM2.5/PM10 a slightly increasing trend was found (about 0.71 and 0.83 for 1995 and 2011, respectively). The increase is stronger in summer than in winter.

Keywords

Particulate matter PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 Objective weather type classification Air mass origin Season Water-soluble ions Carbonaceous material Week-daily pattern 

References

  1. Aas, W., Tsyro, S., Bieber, E., Bergström, R., Ceburnis, D., Ellermann, T., Fagerli, H., Frölich, M., Gehrig, R., Makkonen, U., Nemitz, E., Otjes, R., Perez, N., Perrino, C., Prévôt, A.S.M., Putaud, J.-P., Simpson, D., Spindler, G., Vana, M., Yttri, K.E.: Lessons learnt from the first EMEP intensive measurement periods. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 8073–8094 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdalmogith, S.S., Harrison, R.M.: The use of trajectory cluster analysis to examine the long-range transport of secondary inorganic aerosol in the UK. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6686–6695 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alapaty, K., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Hogrefe, C., Rao, S.T., Ramaswamy, V., Galmarini, S., Schaap, M., Makar, P., Vautard, R., Baklanov, A., Kallos, G., Vogel, B., Sokhi, R.: New Directions: Understanding interactions of air quality and climate change at regional scales. Atmos. Environ. 49, 419–421 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barmpadimos, I., Hueglin, C., Keller, J., Henne, S., Prévôt, A.S.H.: Influence of meteorology on PM10 trends and variability in Switzerland from 1991 to 2008. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1813–1835 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barmpadimos, I., Keller, J., Oderholz, D., Hueglin, C., Prévôt, A.S.H.: One decade of parallel fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10-PM2.5) particulate matter measurements in Europe: trends and variability. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 3189–3203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baur, F., Hess, P., Nagel, H.: Kalender der Großwetterlagen Europas 1881–1939, Bad Homburg (1944)Google Scholar
  7. Bergström, R.: Denier van der Gon, H.A.C., Prévôt, A.S.H., Yttri, K.E., Simpson, D.: Modelling of organic aerosol over Europe (2002–2007) using a volatility basis set (VBS) framework: application of different assumptions regarding the formation of secondary organic aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 8499–8527 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, J.A., Alexis, N., Barnes, C., Bernstein, I.L., Bernstein, J.A., Nel, A., Peden, D., Diaz-Sanchez, D., Tarlo, S.M., Williams, P.B.: Health effects of air pollution. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114, 1116–1123 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bi, X.H., Sheng, G.Y., Peng, P.A., Chen, Y.J., Zhang, Z.Q., Fu, J.M.: Distribution of particulate- and vapor-phase n-alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban atmosphere of Guangzhou. China, Atmos. Environ. 37, 289–298 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bissolli, P., Dittmann, E.: The objective weather type classification of the German Weather Service and its possibilities of application to environmental and meteorological investigations. Meteorol Z 10, 253–260 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brüggemann, E., Rolle, W.: Changes of some components of precipitation in East Germany after the unification. Water Air Soil Pollut 107, 1–23 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brüggemann, E., Spindler, G.: Wet and dry deposition of sulphur at the site Melpitz in East Germany. Water Air Soil Pollut 109, 81–99 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Mertes, S., Acker, K., Auel, R., Wieprecht, W., Möller, D., Collet Jr., J.L., Chang, H., Galgon, D., Chemnitzer, R., Rüd, C., Junek, R., Wiedensohler, W., Herrmann, H.: Schmücke hill cap cloud and valley stations aerosol characterisation during FEBUKO (I): particle size distribution, mass, and main components. Atmos. Environ. 39, 4291–4303 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, M.C., Sioutas, C., Kom, S., Gong Jr., H., Linn, W.S.: Reduction of nitrate losses from filter and impactor samplers by means of concentration enrichment. Atmos. Environ. 34, 85–98 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charron, A., Harrison, R.M., Quincey, P.: What are the sources and conditions responsible for exceedances of the 24h PM10 limit value (50 μgm−3) at a heavily trafficked London site? Atmos. Environ. 41, 1960–1975 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cusack, M., Alastuey, A., Pérez, N., Pey, J., Querol, X.: Trends of particulate matter (PM2.5) and chemical composition at a regional background site in the Western Mediterranean over the last 9 years (2002–2010). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 8341–8357 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawson, J.P., Adams, P.J., Pandis, S.N.: Sensitivity of PM2.5 to climate in the Eastern US: a modelling case study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 4295–4309 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demuzere, M., Trigo, R.M., Vila-Gueraude Arellano, J., van Lipzig, N.P.M.: The impact of weather and atmospheric circulation on O3 and PM10 levels at a rural mid-latitude site. Atmos. Chem. Phys 9, 2695–2714 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Draxler, R.R., Hess, G.D.: An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modelling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition. Aust Meteorol Mag 47, 295–308 (1998)Google Scholar
  20. Draxler, R.R., Rolph, G.D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website (http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD (2003)
  21. Elminir, H.K.: Dependence of urban air pollutants on meteorology. Sci Total Environ 350, 225–237 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. EMEP Transboundary particulate matter in Europe Status report 2010 NILU Reference: O-98134. ISSN 1504–6192 Contributors: Yttri, K.E., Aas, W., Tørseth, K., Stebel, K., Fahre Vik, A., Fjæraa, A.M., Hirdman, D., Tsyro, S., Simpson, D., Marečková, K., Wankmüller, R., Klimont, Z., Kupiainen, K., Amann, M., Bergström, R., Nemitz, E., Querol, X, Alastuey, A., Pey, J., Gehrig, R. http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/reports/emep4-2010.pdf
  23. EMEP Transboundary particulate matter in Europe Status report 2012 NILU Reference: O-7726. ISSN 1504–6192 Contributors: Yttri, K.E., Aas, W., Tørseth, K., Kristiansen, N.I., Myhre, C.L., Tsyro, S., Simpson, D., Bergström, R., Marečková, K., Wankmüller, R., Klimont, Z., Amann, M., Kouvarakis G.N., Laj, P., Pappalardo, G., Prévôt, A. http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/reports/emep4-2012.pdf
  24. EMEP: Transboundary particulate matter in Europe Status report 2009 NILU Reference: O-98134. ISSN 1504–6192 Contributors: Yttri, K.E., Aas, W., Tørseth, K., Stebel, K., Tsyro, S., Simpson, D., Merckova, K.,Wankmüller, R., Zbigniew, K., Bergström, R., Denier van der Gon, H. Holzer-Popp, T., Schroedter-Homscheidt, M. http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/reports/emep4-2009.pdf
  25. Engler, C., Birmili, W., Spindler, G., Wiedensohler, A.: Analysis of exceedances in the daily PM10 mass concentration (50 μgm−3) at a roadside station in Leipzig, Germany. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 10107–10123 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. EU-Commission: Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air. Official Journal of the European Communities L 163, 41–60 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. Fountoukis, C., Racherla, P.N., Denier vander Gon, H.A.C., Polymeneas, P., Charalampidis, P.E., Pilinis, C., Wiedensohler, A., Dall’Osto, M., O’Dowd, C., Pandis, S.N.: Evaluation of a threedimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the European domain during the EUCAARI May 2008 campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 10331–10347 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gnauk, T., Rolle, W., Spindler, G.: Diurnal variations of atmospheric hydrogen peroxide concentrations in Saxony (Germany). J. Atmos. Chem. 27, 79–103 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gnauk, T., Brüggemann, E., Müller, K., Chemnitzer, R., Rüd, C., Galgon, D., Nowak, A., Wiedensohler, A., Acker, K., Auel, R., Wieprecht, W., Jaeschke, W., Herrmann, H.: Aerosol characterisation at the FEBUKO upwind station Goldlauter (I): particle mass, main ionic components, OC/EC, and mass closure. Atmos. Environ. 39, 4209–4218 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Brüggemann, E., Birmili, W., Weinhold, K., van Pinxteren, D., Löschau, G., Spindler, G., Herrmann, H.: A study to discriminate local, urban and regional source contributions to the particulate matter concentrations in the city of Dresden. Germany. J. Atmos. Chem. 68, 199–231 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamed, A., Birmili, W., Joutsensaari, J., Mikkonen, S., Asmi, A., Wehner, B., Spindler, G., Jaatinen, A., Wiedensohler, A., Korhonen, H., Lehtinen, K.E.J., Laaksonen, A.: Changes in the production rate of secondary aerosol particles in Central Europe in view of decreasing SO2 emissions between 1996 and 2006. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 1071–1091 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, R.M., Yin, J.: Chemical speciation of PM2.5 particles at urban background and rural sites in the UK atmosphere. J Environ Monit 12, 1404–1414 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haywood, J., Boucher, O.: Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: a review. Rev Geophys 38, 513–543 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herrera, J., Rojas, J.F., Rodríguez, S., García, R.: Sulfate, nitrate and chloride in PM10 in the city of San José, Costa Rica: 2004–2006. Atmosfera 23, 83–94 (2010)Google Scholar
  35. Herrmann, H.: Kinetics of aqueous phase reactions relevant for atmospheric chemistry. Chem Rev 103, 4691–4716 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herrmann, H., Brüggemann, E., Franck, U., Gnauk, T., Löschau, G., Müller, K., Plewka, A., Spindler, G.: A source study of PM in Saxony by size-segregated characterisation. J. Atmos. Chem. 55, 103–130 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hess, P., Brezowsky, H.: Katalog der Grosswetterlagen Europas, Bibliothek des Deutschen Wetterdienstes in der US-Zone 33, 39 pp. (1952)Google Scholar
  38. Isaksen, I.S.A., Jenkin, M.E., Kaiser, J., Kanakidou, M., Klimont, Z., Kulmala, M., Laj, P., Lawrence, M.G., Lee, J.D., Liousse, C., Maione, M., McFiggans, G., Metzger, A., Mieville, A., Moussiopoulos, N., Orlando, J.J., O’Dowd, C.D., Palmer, P.I., Parrish, D.D., Petzold, A., Platt, U., Pöschl, U., Prévôt, A.S.H., Reeves, C.E., Reimann, S., Rudich, Y., Sellegri, K., Steinbrecher, R., Simpson, D., ten Brink, H., Theloke, J., van der Werf, G.R., Vautard, R., Vestreng, V., Vlachokostas, C., von Glasow, R.: Atmospheric composition change—global and regional air quality. Atmos Environ 43, 5268–5350 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaatinen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Mikkonen, S., Birmili, W., Wehner, B., Spindler, G., Wiedensohler, A., Decesari, S., Mircea, M., Faccini, M.C., Junninen, H., Kulmala, M., Lehtinen, K.E.J., Laaksonen, A.: A comparison of new particle formation events in the boundary layer at three different sites in Europe. Boreal Environment Research 14, 481–498 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. Jacob, D.J., Winner, D.A.: Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmos. Environ. 43, 51–63 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Juda-Rezler, K., Reizer, M., Oudinet, J.-P.: Determination and analysis of PM10 source apportionment during episodes of air pollution in Central Eastern European areas: the case of wintertime 2006. Atmos. Environ. 45, 6557–6566 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Juda-Rezler, K., Reizer, M., Huszar, P., Krüger, B.C., Zanis, P., Syrakov, D., Katragkou, E., Trapp, W., Melas, D., Chervenkov, H., Tegoulias, I., Halenka, T.: Modelling the effects of climate change on air quality over Central and Eastern Europe: concept, evaluation and projections. Clim Res 53, 179–203 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kampa, M., Castanas, E.: Human health effects of air pollution. Environ Pollut 151, 362–367 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kappos, A.D., Bruckmann, P., Eikmamm, T., Engler, N., Heinrich, U., Höppe, P., Koch, E., Krause, G.H.M., Kreyling, W.G., Rauchfuss, K., Rombout, P., Schulz-Klemp, V., Thiel, W.R., Wichmann, H.-E.: Health effects of particles in ambient air. Int J Hyg Environ Health 207, 399–407 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelly, F.J., Fussel, J.: Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 60, 504–526 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klejnowski, K., Kozielska, B., Krasa, A., Rogula-Kozłowska, W.: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and TSP in the upper Silesian agglomeration, Poland. Archives of Environmental Protection 36, 65–72 (2010)Google Scholar
  47. Kowalska, M., Hubicki, L., Zejda, J.E., Ośródka, L., Krajny, E., Wojtylak, M.: Effect of ambient air pollution on daily mortality in Katowice conurbation. Poland. Polish J. of Environ. Stud. 16, 227–232 (2007)Google Scholar
  48. Lammel, G., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Müller, K., Neusüß, C., Röhrl, A.: A new method to study aerosol source contributions along the tracks of air parcels and its application to near-ground level aerosol chemical composition in central Europe. Journal of Aerosol Science 34, 1–25 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lenschow, P., Abraham, H.-J., Kutzner, K., Lutz, M., Preuß, J., Reichenbacher, W.: Some ideas about the sources of PM10. Atmos. Environ. 35, S23–S33 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lohmann, U., Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 715–737 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Löschau, G. Wiedensohler, A., Birmili, W., Rasch, F., Spindler, G., Müller, K., Wolf, U., Hausmann, A., Herrmann H.: Umweltzone Leipzig, Teil 1: Ausgangsbeurteilung vor der Umweltzone. Editor: Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie im Freistaat Sachsen, 82 pp. (2012) https://publikationen.sachsen.de/bdb/artikel/14411/documents/17122
  52. Marquardt, W., Brüggemann, E., Auel, R., Herrmann, H., Möller, D.: Trends of pollution in rain over East Germany caused by changing emissions. Tellus B53, 529–545 (2001)Google Scholar
  53. Metzger, S., Mihalopoulos, N., Lelieveld, J.: Importance of mineral cations and organics in gas-aerosol partitioning of reactive nitrogen compounds: case study based on MINOS results. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 2549–2567 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mikkonen, S., Korhonen, H., Romakkaniemi, S., Smith, J.N., Joutsensaari, J., Lehtinen, K.E.J., Hamed, A., Breider, T.J., Birmili, W., Spindler, G., Plass-Duelmer, C., Facchini, M.A., Laaksonen, A.: Meteorological and trace gas factors affecting the number concentration of atmospheric Aitken (Dp = 50nm) particles in the continental boundary layer: parameterization using a multivariate mixed effects model. Geosci. Model Dev. 4, 1–13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Monks, P.S., Grainier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M.L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., Blake, N., Blake, R.S., Carslaw, K., Cooper, O.R., Dentener, F., Fowler, D., Fragkou, E., Frost, G.J., Generoso, S., Ginoux, P., Grewe, V., Guenther, A., Hansson, H.C., Henne, S., Hjorth, J., Hofzumahaus, A., Huntrieser, H., Isaksen, I.S.A., Jenkin, M.E., Kaiser, J., Kanakidou, M., Klimont, Z., Kulmala, M., Laj, P., Lawrence, M.G., Lee, J.D., Liousse, C., Maione, M., McFiggans, G., Metzger, A., Mieville, A., Moussiopoulos, N., Orlando, J.J., O’Dowd, C.D., Palmer, P.I., Parrish, D.D., Petzold, A., Platt, U., Pöschl, U., Prévôt, A.S.H., Reeves, C.E., Reimann, S., Rudich, Y., Sellegri, K., Steinbrecher, R., Simpson, D., ten Brink, H., Theloke, J., van der Werf, G.R., Vautard, R., Vestreng, V., Vlachokostas, C., von Glasow, R.: Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5268–5350 (2009)Google Scholar
  56. Mues, A., Manders, A., Schaap, M., Kerschbaumer, A., Stern, R., Builtjes, P.: Impact of the extreme meteorological conditions during the summer 2003 in Europe on particulate matter concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 55, 377–391 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Müller, K.: A 3-year study of the aerosol in northwest Saxonia (Germany). Atmos. Environ. 33, 1679–1685 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Müller, K., Spindler, G., van Pinxteren, D., Gnauk, T., Iinuma, Y., Brüggemann, E., Herrmann, H.: Ultrafine and fine particles in the atmosphere—sampling. Chemical Characterization and Sources. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 7, 1130–1136 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Neusüß, C., Gnauk, T., Plewka, A., Herrmann, H., Quinn, P.K.: Carbonaceous aerosol over the Indian ocean: OC/EC fractions and selected specifications from size-segregated onboard samples. J Geophys Res 107(D19), 8031 (2002a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neusüß, C., Wex, H., Birmili, W., Wiedensohler, A., Koziar, C., Busch, B., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Ebert, M., Covert, D.S.: Characterization and parameterization of atmospheric particle number, mass-, and chemical-size distribution in central Europe during LACE 98 and MINT. J Geophys Res 107(D21), 8127 (2002b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peters, A.: Air quality and cardiovascular health: smoke and pollution matter. Circulation 120, 924–927 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pio, C.A., Lopes, D.A.: Chlorine loss from marine aerosol in a coastal atmosphere. J Geophys Res 103(D19), 25263–25272 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Planchon, O., Quénol, N., Dupont, N., Corgne, S.: Application of the Hess-Brezowsky classification to the identification of weather patterns causing heavy winter rainfall in Brittany (France). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9, 1161–1173 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Plessow, K., Spindler, G., Zimmermann, F., Matschullat, J.: Seasonal variations and interactions of N-containing gases and particles over a coniferous forest, Saxony. Germany. Atmos. Environ. 39, 6995–7007 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Plewka, A., Gnauk, T., Brüggemann, E., Neusüß, C., Herrmann, H.: Size-resolved aerosol characterisation for a polluted episode at the IfT research station Melpitz in Autumn 1997. J. Atmos. Chem. 48, 131–156 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Birmilli, W., Plass-Dülmer, C., Wiedensohler, A., Herrmann, H.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of particulate nitrate and organic matter at the IfT research station Melpitz. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 12579–12599 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Putaud, J.-P., Raes, F., Van Dingenen, R., Brüggemann, E., Facchini, M.-C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hüglin, C., Laj, P., Lorbeer, G., Maenhaut, W., Mihalopoulos, N., Müller, K., Querol, X., Rodriguez, S., Schneider, J., Spindler, G., ten Brink, H., Tørseth, K., Wiedensohler, A.: A European aerosol phenomenology – 2: chemical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe. Atmos. Environ. 38, 2579–2595 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Renner, E., Wolke, R.: Simulationen zur Episode hoher Schwebstaubkonzentrationen im Januar und Februar 2006. Immissionsschutz 13, 13–17 (2008)Google Scholar
  69. Rogge, W.F., Hildemann, L.M., Mazurek, M.A., Cass, G.R., Simoneit, B.R.T.: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 3. Road dust, tire debris, and organometallic brake lining dust—roads as sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 27, 1892–1904 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rollins, A.W., Browne, E.C., Min, K.-E., Pusede, S.E., Woodrige, P.L., Gentner, D.R., Goldstein, A.H., Liu, S., Day, D.A., Russel, L.M., Cohen, R.C.: Evidence for NOx Control over Nighttime SOA Formation. Science 337, 1210–1212 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rückerl, R., Schneider, A., Breitner, S., Cyrys, J., Peters, A.: Health effects of particulate air pollution: a review of epidemiological evidence. Inhal Toxicol 23, 555–592 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schaf, W., Weisdorfer, M., Hüttl, R.F.: Soil solution chemistry and element budgets of three scots pine ecosystems along a deposition gradient in north-eastern Germany. Water Air Soil Pollut 85, 1197–1202 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scheinhardt, S., Müller, K., Spindler, G., Herrmann, H.: Complexation of trace metals in size-segregated aerosol particles at nine sites in Germany. Atmos. Environ. 74, 102–109 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schlimper, S.: Meteorologische und statistische Auswertung von Langzeitmessungen zur Charakterisierung des Aerosols an der Forschungsstation Melpitz. Diploma Thesis, University Leipzig, Germany, 90 pages (2010)Google Scholar
  75. Seinfeld, J.H., Pandis, S.N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics. In John Wiley & Sons, I. (ed.) 1326 pp. (1998)Google Scholar
  76. Simoneit, B.R.T.: A review of biomarker compounds as source indicators and tracers for air pollution. ESPR-Environ. Sci. & Pollut. Res. 6, 159–169 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Spindler, G., Mölders, N., Hanß, J., Beier, N., Kramm, G.: Determining the dry deposition of SO2, O3, NO and NO2 at the SANA core station Melpitz. Meteorol. Zeitschrift, N.F. 5, 205–220 (1996)Google Scholar
  78. Spindler, G., Müller, K., Herrmann, H.: Main particulate matter components in Saxony (Germany)—trends and sampling aspects. Env. Sci. Pol. Res. 6, 89–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spindler, G., Teichmann, U., Sutton, M.A.: Ammonia dry deposition over grassland—micrometeorological flux-gradient measurements and bi-directional flux calculations using an Inferential Modell. Q J R Meteorol Soc 127, 795–814 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Spindler, G., Müller, K., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Herrmann, H.: Long-term-size-segregated characterization of PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 at the IfT reseach station Melpitz downwind of Leipzig (Germany). Atmos. Environ. 38, 5333–5347 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Spindler, G., Brüggemann, E., Gnauk, T., Grüner, A., Müller, K., Herrmann, H.: A four-year size-segregated characterization study of particles PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 depending on air mass origin at Melpitz. Atmos. Environ. 44, 164–173 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spindler, G., Gnauk, T., Grüner, A., Iinuma, Y., Müller, K., Scheinhardt, S., Herrmann, H.: Size-segregated characterization of PM10 at the EMEP site Melpitz (Germany) using a five-stage impactor: a 6 year study. J. Atmos. Chem. 69, 127–157 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stern, R., Builtjes, P., Schaap, M., Timmermans, R., Vautard, R., Hodzic, A., Memmersheimer, M., Feldmann, H., Renner, E., Wolke, R., Kerschbaumer, A.: A model inter-comparison study focussing on episodes with elevated PM10 concentrations. Atmos. Environ. 42, 4567–4588 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tørseth, K., Aas, W., Breivik, K., Fjæraa, A.M., Fiebig, M., Hjellbrekke, A.G., Lund Myhre, C., Solberg, S., Yttri, K.E.: Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 5447–5481 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tsyro, S., Aas, W., Soares, J., Sofiev, M., Berge, H., Spindler, G.: Modelling of sea salt concentrations over Europe: key uncertainties and comparison with observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 10367–10388 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Viana, M., Maenhaut, W., Chi, X., Querol, X., Alastuey, A.: Comparative chemical mass closure of fine and coarse aerosols at two sites in south and west Europe: implication for EU air pollution policies. Atmos. Environ. 41, 315–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wieprecht, W., Acker, K., Müller, K., Spindler, G., Brüggemann, E., Maenhaut, W., Chi, X., Hitzenberger, R., Bauer, H., ten Brink, H.M.: INTERCOMP2000: ionic constitution and comparison of filter and impactor. Atmos. Environ. 38, 6477–6486 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wolke, R., Schröder, W., Schrödner, R., Renner, E.: Influence of grid resolution and meteorological forcing on simulated European air quality: a sensitivity study with the modeling system COSMO-MUSCAT. Atmos. Environ. 53, 110–130 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zelenka, M.P.: An analysis of the meteorological parameters affecting ambient concentrations of acid aerosols in Uniontown, Pennsylvania. Atmos. Environ. 31, 869–878 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Spindler
    • 1
  • A. Grüner
    • 1
  • K. Müller
    • 1
  • S. Schlimper
    • 2
  • H. Herrmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz-Institut für Troposphärenforschung (TROPOS)LeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Deutsche WetterSchutz GmbHLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations