Advertisement

Journal of Oceanography

, Volume 72, Issue 4, pp 553–565 | Cite as

Evaluation of the accuracy of downward radiative flux observations at the sea surface

  • Kyohei YamadaEmail author
  • Tadahiro Hayasaka
Original Article

Abstract

Observations of downward radiative flux at the sea surface generally contain uncertainty due to limited numbers of observations and limitations of auxiliary equipment. The lack of shading from direct solar radiation and ventilation systems causes bias or random errors. To evaluate the error of radiation measurements at buoys, downward shortwave and longwave radiative fluxes are compared with International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP), Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA55), and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) retrieved model calculations of 3-h and daytime averages. Cloud masking is evaluated by a combination of MTSAT-1R and in situ observations. Coincident observations from a land-surface station located near the buoy observatories are compared with satellite and reanalysis products. The bias at buoys, compared with retrievals, approximately over- and under-estimate for longwave and shortwave fluxes, respectively. The bias at buoys is larger and smaller than the land by 23–34 W m−2 for longwave and 13–51 W m−2 for shortwave radiation using 3-h averages under clear-sky conditions. The differences in bias decrease when using daytime averages for longwave, but the difference for shortwave increases with daytime averages. To evaluate the effect of environmental factors on buoy observations, we compared rainfall, wind speed, and solar zenith angle with the biases. We found that rainfall and wind speed affect buoy pyrgeometers such that they overestimate the longwave flux. The cosine of solar zenith angle does not cause overestimation for longwave flux, and the effect of dome heating is small. The strong wind causes underestimation of the shortwave radiative flux due to tilting. The effect of wind is reduced when daily averages are used.

Keywords

In situ observation Kuroshio extension Longwave radiation Observation accuracy Shortwave radiation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Global Change Observation Mission (GCOM) research fund and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas No. 22106004 from 440 Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan. The dataset used for this study is provided from the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55) project carried out by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). The Terra/MODIS level 2 Joint Atmosphere product dataset was acquired from the Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), located in the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD, USA (https://ladsweb.nascom.nasa.gov/).

References

  1. Alados-Arboledas L, Vida J, Jimenez JI (1988) Effects of solar radiation on the performance of pyrgeometers with silicon domes. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 5(5):666–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cronin MF, Meinig C, Sabine CL, Ichikawa H, Tomita H (2008) Surface mooring network in the Kuroshio Extension. Syst J IEEE 2(3):424–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ebita A, Kobayashi S, Ota Y, Moriya M, Kumabe R, Onogi K et al (2011) The Japanese 55-year reanalysis “JRA-55”: an interim report. Sola 7:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fasullo JT, Trenberth KE (2008) The annual cycle of the energy budget part I: global mean and land-ocean exchanges. J Climate 21(10):2297–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Han Q, Rossow WB, Lacis AA (1994) Near-global survey of effective droplet radii in liquid water clouds using ISCCP data. J Climate 7(4):465–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Han Q, Rossow WB, Chou J, Kuo KS, Welch RM (1999) The effects of aspect ratio and surface roughness on satellite retrievals of ice-cloud properties. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 63(2):559–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hänel G (1976) The properties of atmospheric aerosol particles as functions of the relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding moist air. Adv Geophys 19:73–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hess M, Koepke P, Schult I (1998) Optical properties of aerosols and clouds: the software package OPAC. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 79(5):831–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Inoue T (1987) A cloud type classification with NOAA 7 split-window measurements. J Geohys Res D 92(D4):3991–4000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Katsaros KB, Devault JE (1986) On irradiance measurement errors at sea due to tilt of pyranometers. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 3(4):740–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kawai Y, Kawamura H (2005) Validation and improvement of satellite-derived surface solar radiation over the northwestern Pacific Ocean. J Oceanogr 61(1):79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendall MG (1948) Rank correlation methods. Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  13. Kiehl JT, Hack JJ, Bonan GB, Boville BY, Briegleb BP, Williamson DL, Rasch PJ (1996) Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-420 + STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, pp152 Google Scholar
  14. Kubota M, Iwabe N, Cronin MF, Tomita H (2008) Surface heat fluxes from the NCEP/NCAR and NCEP/DOE reanalyses at the Kuroshio Extension Observatory buoy site. J Geophys Res C113 (C2)Google Scholar
  15. MacWhorter MA, Weller RA (1991) Error in measurements of incoming shortwave radiation made from ships and buoys. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 8(1):108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mann HB (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econom J Econom Soc 245–259Google Scholar
  17. Medovaya M, Waliser DE, Weller RA, McPhaden MJ (2002) Assessing ocean buoy shortwave observations using clear-sky model calculations. J Geohys Res C 107(C2):6-1–6-22Google Scholar
  18. Meloni D, Di Biagio C, Di Sarra A, Monteleone F, Pace G, Sferlazzo DM (2012) Accounting for the solar radiation Influence on downward longwave irradiance measurements by pyrgeometers. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 29(11):1629–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nast PM (1983) Measurements on the accuracy of pyranometers. Sol Energy 31(3):279–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Niu X, Pinker RT, Cronin MF (2010) Radiative fluxes at high latitudes. Geophys Res Lett 37(20):1–5. doi: 10.1029/2010GL044606 (L20811) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohmura A, Gilgen H, Hegner H, Müller G, Wild M, Dutton EG et al (1998) Baseline surface radiation network (BSRN/WCRP): new precision radiometry for climate research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(10):2115–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Onogi K, Tsutsui J, Koide H, Sakamoto M, Kobayashi S, Hatsushika H et al (2007) The JRA-25 reanalysis. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 2 85(3):369–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pascal RW, Josey SA (2000) Accurate radiometric measurement of the atmospheric longwave flux at the sea surface. J Atmo Ocean Technol 17(9):1271–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pérez M, Alados-Arboledas L (1999) Effects of natural ventilation and solar radiation on the performance of pyrgeometers. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 16(1):174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Philipona R, Fröhlich C, Betz C (1995) Characterization of pyrgeometers and the accuracy of atmospheric long-wave radiation measurements. Appl Optics 34(9):1598–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Philipona R, Dürr B, Marty C (2004) Greenhouse effect and altitude gradients over the Alps–by surface longwave radiation measurements and model calculated LOR. Theoret Appl Climatol 77(1–2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinker RT, Wang H, Grodsky SA (2009) How good are ocean buoy observations of radiative fluxes? Geophys Res Lett 36(10):1–5. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037840 (L10811) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rossow WB, Zhang YC (1995) Calculation of surface and top of atmosphere radiative fluxes from physical quantities based on ISCCP data sets: 2. Validation and first results. J Geohys Res D 100(D1):1167–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schanz LC, Schlüssel P (1997) Atmospheric back radiation in the tropical pacific: intercomparison of in situ measurements, simulations and satellite retrievals. Meteor Atmos Phys 63(3–4):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sekiguchi M, Nakajima T (2008) A k-distribution-based radiation code and its computational optimization for an atmospheric general circulation model. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 109(17):2779–2793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Serra YL, A’hearn P, Freitag HP, McPhaden MJ (2001) ATLAS self-siphoning rain gauge error estimates. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 18(12):1989–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sugi M (1990) Description and performance of the JMA operational global spectral model (JMA-GSM88). Geophys Mag 43:105–130Google Scholar
  33. Tanahashi S, Kawamura H, Matsuura T, Takahashi T, Yusa H (2001) A system to distribute satellite incident solar radiation in real-time. Remote Sens Environ 75(3):412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT (2008) An observational estimate of inferred ocean energy divergence. J Phys Oceanogr 38(5):984–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Udo SO (2000) Quantification of solar heating of the dome of a pyrgeometer for a tropical location: Ilorin, Nigeria. J Atmos Oceanic Tech 17(7):995–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waliser DE, Weller RA, Cess RD (1999) Comparisons between buoy-observed, satellite-derived, and modeled surface shortwave flux over the subtropical North Atlantic during the subduction experiment. J Geohys Res D 104(D24):31301–31320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang K, Dickinson RE (2013) Global atmospheric downward longwave radiation at the surface from ground-based observations, satellite retrievals, and reanalyses. Rev Geophys 51(2):150–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang H, Pinker RT (2009) Shortwave radiative fluxes from MODIS: model development and implementation. J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 114(D20)Google Scholar
  39. Yamamoto G (1952) On the Radiation Chart., Sci. Rep., Tohoku Univ. Ser. 5. Geophys. 5:9–23Google Scholar
  40. Zhang Y, Rossow WB, Lacis AA, Oinas V, Mishchenko MI (2004) Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data. J Geohys Res D 109(D19)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Oceanographic Society of Japan and Springer Japan 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Graduate School of ScienceTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations