Journal of Oceanography

, Volume 69, Issue 6, pp 737–751 | Cite as

Some properties of tidal currents estimated from analytical and LES simulation studies

Original Article

Abstract

Some features of tidal current ellipses near the ocean floor are estimated from the bottom-limit solutions of the tidal equations with constant eddy viscosity. It is verified that a clockwise rotating ellipse becomes broad descending through the bottom boundary, whereas a counterclockwise ellipse becomes narrow except near the critical latitude. The major axis of an ellipse near the floor is directed 45° leftward (rightward) against that of the overlying tidal flow ellipse poleward from the critical latitude in the northern (southern) hemisphere. Equatorward from the critical latitude, the major axis near the floor lines up with that of the overlying tidal current ellipse in both hemispheres. The retrograde rotating hodograph against the overlying clockwise tidal hodograph appears near the floor around the critical latitude. These features are confirmed from the numerical studies using the large eddy simulation model. The deflection of the major axis poleward from the critical latitude is a little smaller, about 19°. Furthermore, the effects of nontraditional Coriolis force resulting from the horizontal component of the earth-rotating vector on the development of turbulence were investigated. When the diurnal tidal current is directed westward, the effective vertical eddy viscosity becomes maximum with developing turbulence. While in the case of a semidiurnal tide, a northward tidal current is preferred for turbulence development.

Keywords

Large Eddy simulation Tide Turbulence Tidal current ellipse Bottom boundary layer Eddy viscosity Nontraditional Coriolis effect 

References

  1. Book JW, Martin PJ, Janekovic I, Kuzmic M, Wimbush M (2009) Vertical structure of bottom Ekman tidal flows: observations, theory, and modeling from the northern Adriatic. J Geophys Res 114. doi:10.1029/2008JC004736
  2. Coleman GN, Ferziger JH, Spalart PR (1990) A numerical study of the turbulent Ekman layer. J Fluid Mech 213:313–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cushuman-Roisin B, Malačič V (1997) Bottom Ekman pumping with stress-dependent eddy viscosity. J Phys Oceanogr 27:1967–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deardorff JW (1980) Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Bound Layer Meteorol 18(4):495–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Defant A (1963) Pysical oceanography. Annales De Geographie 72(390):195–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckart C (1960) Hydrodynamics of oceans and atmosphere. Pergamon Press, New York, p 290Google Scholar
  7. Ekman VW (1905) On the influence of the earth’s rotation on ocean currents. Arch Math Astron Phys. 2:1–52Google Scholar
  8. Fjeldstad JE (1929) Contribution to the dynamics of free progressive tidal waves. Geofysisk Institutt, Bergen, p 80Google Scholar
  9. Garcez-Faria AF, Thornton EB, Stanton TP, Soares CV, Lippmann TC (1998) Vertical profiles of longshore currents and related bed shear stress and bottom roughness. J Geophys Res 103(C2): 3217–3232Google Scholar
  10. Gayen B, Sarkar S, Taylor JR (2010) Large eddy simulation of a stratified boundary layer under an oscillatory current. J Fluid Mech 643. doi:10.1017/S002211200999200X
  11. Gerkema T, Zimmerman JTF, Maas LRM, van Haren H (2008) Geophysical and astrophysical fluid dynamics beyond the traditional approximation. Rev Geophys 46. RG2004. doi:10.1029/2006RG000220
  12. Godin G (1972) The analysis of tides. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, p 264Google Scholar
  13. Hayashi M, Itoh H (2012) On the importance of the nontraditional Coriolis terms in large-scale motions associated with cumulus convective forcing in the tropic: Forced response problem. J Atmos Sci 69:2699–2716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsu C, Lu X, Kwan M (2000) LES and RANS studies of oscillating flows over flat plate. J Eng Mech 126(2):186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hua BL, Moore DM, LeGentil S (1997) Inertial nonlinear equilibration of equatorial flows. J Fluid Mech 331:345–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kundu PK, Blanton JO, Janopaul MM (1981) Analysis of current observations on the Georgia Shelf. J Phys Oceanogr 11:1139–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee J-S, Matsuno T (2007) Intrusion of Kuroshio Water onto the Continental Shelf of the East China Sea. J Oceanogr 63:309–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leibovich S, Lele SK (1985) The influence of the horizontal component of Earth’s angular velocity on the instability of the Ekman layer. J Fluid Mech 150:41–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li M, Sanford L, Chao S-Y (2005) Effects of time dependence in unstratified tidal boundary layers: results from large eddy simulations. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 62:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li M, Trowbridge J, Geyer R (2008) Asymmetric tidal mixing due to the horizontal density gradient. J Phys Oceanogr 38:418–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Radhakrishnan S, Piomelli U, Geyer WR (2010) Large-eddy simulation of the tidal-cycle variations of an estuarine boundary layer. J Geophys Res 115:C08003. doi:10.1029/2009JC005702
  22. Maas LRM, van Haren JJM (1987) Observations on the vertical structure of tidal and inertial currents in the central North Sea. J Mar Res 45:293–318Google Scholar
  23. McWilliams JC, Huckle E (2006) Ekman layer rectification. J Phys Oceanogr 36:1646–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prandle D (1982) The vertical structure of tidal currents. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 22:29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raasch S, Schröter M (2001) PALM-A large-eddy simulation model performing on massively parallel computers. Meteor Z 10(5):363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radhakrishnan S, Piomelli U (2008) Large-eddy simulation of oscillating boundary layers: model comparison and validation. J Geophys Res 113:C02022. doi:02010.01029/02007JC004518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sakamoto K, Akitomo K (2006) Instability of the tidally induced bottom boundary layer in the rotating frame and their mixing effect. Dyn Atmos Oceans 41:191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sakamoto K, Akitomo K (2008) The tidally induced bottom boundary layer in a rotating frame: similarity of turbulence. J Fluid Mech 615:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sakamoto K, Akitomo K (2009) The tidally induced bottom boundary layer in the rotating frame: development of the turbulent mixed layer under stratification. J Fluid Mech 619:235–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simpson JH, Crawford WR, Rippeth TP, Campbell AR (1996) The vertical structure of turbulent dissipation in shelf seas. J Phys Oceanogr 26:1579–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Soulsby RL (1983) The bottom boundary layer of shelf seas. Phys Oceanogr Coast Shelf Seas Elsevier Oceanogr Ser 35:189–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Straneo F, Kawase M, Riser SC (2002) Idealized models of slantwise convection in a baroclinic flow. J Phys Oceanogr 32:558–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sverdrup HU (1927) Dynamics of tides on the North Siberian shelf. Results from the Maud Expedition. Geofysiske Publikasjoner, p 75Google Scholar
  34. Thorpe SA, Green JAM, Simpson JH, Osborn TR, Smith WAMN (2008) Boils and turbulence in a weakly stratified shallow tidal sea. J Phys Oceanogr 38:1711–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wakata Y (2010) Numerical simulation of ocean bottom boundary layer. Theor Appl Mech Japan 58:145–151Google Scholar
  36. Wakata Y (2011) Dependence of seafloor boundary layer thickness on the overlying flow direction: a large eddy simulation study. J Oceanogr 67:667–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wirth A, Barnier B (2006) Tilted convective plumes in numerical experiments. Ocean Modell. 12:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wirth A, Barnier B (2008) Mean circulation and structures of tilted ocean deep convection. J Phys Oceanogr 38:803–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoshikawa Y, Endo T, Matsuno T, Wagawa T, Tsutsmi E, Yoshimura H (2010) Turbulent bottom Ekman boundary layer measured over a continental shelf. Geophys Res Lett 37:L15605. doi:10.11029/12010GL044156 Google Scholar
  40. Zikanov O, Slinn DN, Dhanak MR (2003) Large-eddy simulations of the wind-induced turbulent Ekman layer. J Fluid Mech 495:343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Oceanographic Society of Japan and Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Applied Mechanics (RIAM)Kyushu UniversityKasugaJapan

Personalised recommendations