Journal of Oceanography

, Volume 68, Issue 5, pp 743–760 | Cite as

Tracing offshore low-salinity plumes in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico during the summer season by use of multispectral remote-sensing data

  • Young Baek Son
  • Wilford D. Gardner
  • Mary Jo Richardson
  • Joji Ishizaka
  • Joo-Hyung Ryu
  • Sang-Hyun Kim
  • Sang H. Lee
Original Article

Abstract

To trace offshore surface low-salinity water (LSW) in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico, a proxy was developed using the surface water beam attenuation coefficient (cp), and salinity matched with synchronous Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) satellite data from three annual summer cruises (July 1998–August 2000) using a two-step empirical approach. First, a relationship between in-situ salinity and cp was obtained. Second, in-situ cp was matched with SeaWiFS radiance ratios of all available blue-to-green wavelengths. Finally, satellite-derived surface salinity was determined directly by combining the two empirical relationships, providing a robust estimate over a range of salinities (26–36). This significantly improves the limited spatial and temporal resolution of surface salinity distribution obtained by shipboard sampling. The resulting correlation is best explained as mixing between low-salinity plume waters and normal salinity Gulf waters. The empirical relationships were used to map satellite-derived salinity using the average of SeaWiFS images during each summer cruise. As expected for summer, spatial patterns of LSW plumes with high cp, particulate matter (PM), particulate organic carbon (POC), and chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) were connected to the mouth of the Mississippi River Delta and extended to the east-southeast. Normal salinity Gulf water with lower cp, PM, POC, and Chl-a was confined to the shelf and upper slope in the eastern part of the study area, outside the plumes. This proxy approach can be applied throughout the region of shipboard sampling for more detailed coverage and analysis.

Keywords

Low-salinity water (LSW) Beam attenuation coefficient Satellite-derived salinity Gulf of Mexico SeaWiFS MNDCI 

References

  1. Ahn YH, Shanmugam P, Rhy JH, Jeong JC (2006) Satellite detection of harmful algal bloom occurrences in Korean waters. Harmful Algae 5:213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn YH, Shanmugam P, Moon JE, Ryu JH (2008) Satellite remote sensing of a low-salinity plume in the East China Sea. Ann Geophys 26:2019–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey SW, Werdell PJ (2006) A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products. Remote Sens Environ 102:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker ET, Lavelle JW (1984) The effect of particle size on the light attenuation coefficient of natural suspensions. J Geophys Res 89:8197–8203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernal CE (2001) Spatial and temporal distributions of particulate matter and particulate organic carbon, northeast Gulf of Mexico. MS thesis, Texas A&M University, College StationGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs DC (1992) Nutrients, plankton, and productivity in a warm-core ring in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 97:2143–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs DC, Muller-Karger FE (1994) Ship and satellite observation of chlorophyll stocks in interesting cyclone–anticyclone eddy pairs in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 99(4):7371–7384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binding CE, Bowers DG (2003) Measuring the salinity of the Clyde Sea from remotely sensed ocean color. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57:605–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop JKB (1999) Transmissometer measurement of POC. Deep Sea Res I 46(2):353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boesch DF, Boynton WR, Crowder LB, Diaz RJ, Howarth RW, Mee LD, Nixon SW, Rabalais NN, Rosenberg R, Sanders JG, Scavia D, Tuner RE (2009) Nutrient enrichment drives Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. EOS 90:117–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bricaud A, Morel A, Prieur L (1981) Absorption by dissolved organic matter of the sea (yellow substance) in the UV and visible domains. Limnol Oceanogr 26(1):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooks DA, Legeckis RV (1982) A ship and satellite view of hydrographic features in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 87:4195–4206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carder KL, Chen FR, Lee ZP, Hawes SK, Kamykowski D (1999) Semianalytic Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer algorithms for chlorophyll-a and absorption with bio-optical domains based on nitrate-depletion temperatures. J Geophys Res 104:5403–5421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chung SP, Gardner WD, Landry MR, Richardson MJ, Walsh ID (1998) Beam attenuation by microorganism and detrital particles in the equatorial Pacific. J Geophys Res 103:12669–12681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D’Sa EJ, DiMarco SF (2009) Seasonal variability and controls on chromophoric dissolved organic matter in large river-dominated coastal margin. Limnol Oceanogr 54(6):2233–2242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Sa EJ, Miller RL (2003) Bio-optical properties in waters influenced by the Mississippi River during low flow conditions. Remote Sens Environ 84:538–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner WD, Walsh ID, Richardson MJ (1993) Biophysical forcing of particle production and distribution during a spring bloom in the North Atlantic. Deep Sea Res II 40:171–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner WD, Mishonov AV, Richardson MJ (2006) Global POC concentrations from in situ and satellite data. Deep Sea Res II 53:718–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbes F, Thomas C, Walsh JJ, Muller-Karger FE (1996) An episodic chlorophyll plume on the West Florida Shelf. Cont Shelf Res 16:1201–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbes F, Muller-Karger FE, DelCastillo C (2002) New evidence for the West Florida Shelf Plume. Cont Shelf Res 22:2479–2496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon HR, Wang M (1994) Retrieval of water-leaving radiance and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: a preliminary algorithm. Appl Opt 33:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green RE, Gould RW Jr, Ko DS (2008) Statistical models for sediment/detritus and dissolved absorption coefficients in coastal waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Cont Shelf Res 28:1273–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamilton P, Fargion GS, Biggs DV (1999) Loop current eddy paths in the western Gulf of Mexico. J Phys Oceanogr 29:1180–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamilton P, Berger TJ, Johnson W (2002) On the structure and motions of cyclones in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 107:3208–3226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hooker SB, Firestone ER, Acker JC (1994) SeaWiFS pre-launch radiometric calibration and spectral characterization. SeaWiFS technical report series, NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, vol 23Google Scholar
  26. Hu C, Muller-Karger FE, Biggs DC, Carder KL, Nababan B, Nadeau D, Vanderbloemen J (2003) Comparison of ship and satellite bio-optical measurements on the continental margin of the NE Gulf of Mexico. Int J Remote Sens 24(13):2597–2612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu C, Chen Z, Clayton TD, Swarzenski P, Brock JC, Muller-Karger FE (2004) Assessment of estuarine water-quality indicators using MODIS medium-resolution bands: initial results from Tampa Bay, FL. Remote Sens Environ 93:423–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim H-C, Yamaguchi H, Yoo SJ, Zhu J, Okamura K, Kiyomoto Y, Tanaka K, Kim S-W, Park TW, Oh IS, Ishizaka J (2009) Distribution of Changjiang diluted water detected by satellite chlorophyll-a and its interannual variation during 1998–2007. J Oceanogr 65:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McClain CR, Feldman GC, Hooker SB (2004) An overview of the SeaWiFS project and strategies for producing a climate research quality global ocean bio-optical time series. Deep Sea Res II 51:5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mishonov AV, Gardner WD, Richardson MJ (2003) Remote sensing and surface POC concentration in the South Atlantic. Deep Sea Res II 50:2997–3015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morey SL, Martin PJ, O’Brien JJ, Wallcraft AA, Zavala-Hidalgo J (2003) Export pathways for river discharged fresh water in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res 108(C10). doi:10.1029/20002JC001674
  32. Nittrouer CA, Wright LD (1994) Transport of particles across continental shelves. Rev Geophys 32(1):85–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nowlin WD, Jochens AE, Reid RO, DiMarco SF (1998) Texas-Louisiana shelf circulation and transport processes study: synthesis report, vol I: technical report. OCS Study MMS 98-0035. U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico, OCS Region, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohlmann JC, Niiler PP (2005) Circulation over the continental shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Prog Oceanogr 64:45–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Qian Y, Jochens AE, Kennicutt MCII, Biggs DC (2003) Spatial and temporal variability of phytoplankton biomass and community structure over the continental margin of the northeast Gulf of Mexico based on pigment analysis. Cont Shelf Res 23:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Justic D, Dortch Q, Wiseman WJ, Sen Gupta BK (1996) Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf. Estuaries 19:386–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roesler CS, Boss E (2003) Spectral beam attenuation coefficient retrieved from ocean color inversion. Geophys Res Lett 30:1468. doi:10.1029/2002GL016185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ross CB, Gardner WD, Richardson MJ, Asper VL (2009) Currents and sediment transport in the Mississippi Canyon and effects of Hurricane Georges. Cont Shelf Res 29:1384–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sahl LE, Wiesenburg DA, Merrell WJ (1997) Interactions of mesoscale features with Texas shelf and slope waters. Cont Shelf Res 17:117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sasaki H, Siswanto E, Nishiuchi K, Tanaka K, Hasegawa T, Ishizaka J (2008) Mapping the low salinity Changjiang diluted water using satellite retrieved colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in the East China Sea during high river flow season. Geophys Res Lett 35:L04604. doi:10.1029/2007GL032637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schiller RV, Kourafalou VH, Hogan P, Walker ND (2011) The dynamics of the Mississippi River plume: impact of topography, wind and offshore forcing on the fate of plume waters. J Geophys Res 116:C06029. doi:10.1029/2010JC006883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siegel DA, Maritorena S, Nel NB, Behrenfeld MJ (2005) Independence and interdependencies among global ocean color properties: reassessing the bio-optical assumption. J Geophys Res 110:C07011. doi:10.1029/2004JC002527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Son YB (2006) POC algorithms based on spectral remote sensing data and its temporal and spatial variability in the Gulf of Mexico. PhD thesis, Texas A&M University, College StationGoogle Scholar
  44. Son YB, Gardner WD (2010) Determining spatial and temporal variations of surface particulate organic carbon (POC) using in-situ measurements and remote sensing data in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico during El Niño and La Niña. The Sea J Korean Soc Oceanogr 15(2):51–61 (in Korean with English abstract)Google Scholar
  45. Son YB, Gardner WD (2011) Climatological variability of surface particulate organic carbon (POC) and physical processes based on ocean color data in the Gulf of Mexico. Korean J Remote Sens 27(3):235–258Google Scholar
  46. Son YB, Gardner WD, Mishonov AV, Richardson MJ (2009a) Model-based remote sensing algorithms for particulate organic carbon (POC) in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. J Earth Syst Sci 1:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Son YB, Gardner WD, Mishonov AV, Richardson MJ (2009b) Multispectral remote-sensing algorithms for particulate organic carbon (POC): the Gulf of Mexico. Remote Sens Environ 113:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Son YB, Ishizaka J, Jeong J-C, Kim H-C, Lee T (2011) Cochlodinium polykrikoides red tide detection in the South Sea of Korea using spectral classification of MODIS data. Ocean Sci J 46(4):239–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stramski D, Reynolds RA, Babin M, Kaczmarek S, Lewis MR, Rottgers R, Sciandra A, Stramska M, Twardowski MS, Franz BA, Claustre H (2008) Relationship between the surface concentration of particulate organic carbon and optical properties in the eastern South Pacific and eastern Atlantic Oceans. Biogeosciences 5:171–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sydor M, Arnone RA (1997) Effect of suspended particles and dissolved organic matter on remote sensing of coastal and riverine waters. Appl Opt 36:6905–6912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walker ND (1996) Satellite assessment of Mississippi River plume variability: causes and predictability. Remote Sens Environ 58:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker ND, Rouse LJ, Rouge B, Fargion GS, Biggs DC (1994) The great flood of summer 1993: Mississippi River discharge studied. EOS 75:409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walker ND, Wiseman WJJR, Rouse LJJR, Babin A (2005) Effects of river discharge, wind stress, and slope eddies on circulation and the satellite-observed structure of the Mississippi River Plume. J Coast Res 21(6):1228–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wentz FJ, LeVine D (2008) Algorithm theoretical basis document Aquarius level-2 radiometer algorithm: revision 1. Aquarius RSS Technical Report 012208, Aquarius Ground Segment, Goddard Space Flight Center, January 2008Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Oceanographic Society of Japan and Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Young Baek Son
    • 1
  • Wilford D. Gardner
    • 2
  • Mary Jo Richardson
    • 2
  • Joji Ishizaka
    • 3
  • Joo-Hyung Ryu
    • 1
  • Sang-Hyun Kim
    • 4
  • Sang H. Lee
    • 5
  1. 1.Korea Ocean Satellite Center (KOSC)Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (KIOST)SeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of OceanographyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  3. 3.Hydrospheric Atmospheric Research Center (HyARC)Nagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  4. 4.Mechanical Systems EngineeringHansung UniversitySeoulKorea
  5. 5.Department of Marine SciencePusan National University, BusanSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations