Journal of Oceanography

, Volume 61, Issue 5, pp 905–912

Inter-manufacturer Difference and Temperature Dependency of the Fall-Rate of T-5 Expendable Bathythermograph

Article

Abstract

The fall-rate of the T-5 expendable bathythermograph (XBT) produced by Tsurumi Seiki (TSK) Co., Ltd and that by Sippican Inc., are intercompared by a series of contemporaneous and colocated measurements with conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profilers. It is confirmed that the fall-rates of the two manufacturers' T-5 differ by about 5 percent, despite the fact that they had been believed to be identical for many years. The cause of the difference is discussed on the basis of a detailed cross-examination of the two T-5 models. It is found for the first time that the two models are different in several respects. The manufacturer's fall-rate equation is only applicable to the Sippican T-5, for which Boyd and Linzell's (1993) equation seems to be slightly more accurate. Kizu et al.'s (2005) equation gives a clearly less biased depth than the manufacturers' equation for the TSK T-5. It is also found that the fall-rates of both T-5 models are dependent on water temperature, perhaps because of viscosity. The temperature-dependency of the fall-rate of the TSK T-5 is larger than that of the Sippican T-5.

Keywords

T-5 XBT expendable bathythermograph fall-rate equation time-depth conversion equation temperature measurement VOS monitoring water viscosity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyd, J. D. and R. S. Linzell (1993): The temperature and depth accuracy of Sippican T-5 XBTs. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 10, 128–136.Google Scholar
  2. Conkright, M. E., J. I. Antonov, O. Baranova, T. P. Boyer, H. E. Garcia, R. Gelfeld, D. Johnson, R. A. Locarnini, P. P. Murphy, T. D. O'Brien, O. Smolyar and C. Stephens (2002): World Ocean Database 2001, Volume 1: Introduction, ed. by S. Levitus, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 42, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 167 pp., CD-ROMs.Google Scholar
  3. Green, A. W. (1984): Bulk dynamics of the expendable bathythermograph (XBT). Deep-Sea Res., 31(4), 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanawa, K., P. Rual, R. Bailey, A. Sy and N. Szabados (1995): A new depth-time equation for Sippican or TSK T-7, T-6 and T-4 expendable bathythermograph (XBT). Deep-Sea Res., 42(8), 1423–1451.Google Scholar
  5. Kizu, S., H. Yoritaka and K. Hanawa (2005): A new fall-rate equation for T-5 expendable bathythermograph (XBT) by TSK. J. Oceanogr., 61(1), 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Seaver, G. A. and S. Kuleshov (1982): Experimental and analytical error of the expendable bathythermograph. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 12, 592–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Thadathil, P., A. K. Ghosh and P. M. Muraleedharan (1998): An evaluation of XBT depth equations for Indian Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. I, 45, 819–827.Google Scholar
  8. Thadathil, P., A. K. Saran, V. V. Gopalakrishna, P. Vethamony and N. Araligidad (2002): XBT fall rate in waters of extreme temperature: A case study in the Antarctic Ocean. J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 391–396.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Oceanographic Society of Japan/TERRAPUB/Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of ScienceTohoku UniversityAza Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, SendaiJapan
  2. 2.Tohoku National Fisheries Research InstituteShinhama-cho, Shiogama, MiyagiJapan
  3. 3.National Research Institute for Far Seas FisheriesShimizu Orido, ShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations