Advertisement

The Power of Doing: How Job Crafting Transmits the Beneficial Impact of Autonomy Among Overqualified Employees

  • Maike E. DebusEmail author
  • Christian Gross
  • Martin Kleinmann
Original Paper
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Overqualified individuals have more experience, KSAs (knowledge, skills, abilities), and/or education than what is needed in their job. Prior research has identified autonomy as a work characteristic that helps individuals deal with overqualification; yet, it remains unclear as to why this is the case. The goal of the present study was to identify the mechanism through which autonomy exerts its beneficial impact. Drawing on the literatures of person-environment fit and proactivity, we first hypothesized that, in addition to autonomy, job crafting likewise moderates the relationship between overqualification and both withdrawal and turnover intention as central outcomes. Job crafting denotes a proactive type of behavior whereby individuals change the boundaries of their jobs. Next, we hypothesized that job crafting is positively related to autonomy, and that job crafting represents the key mechanism through which autonomy moderates the overqualification-outcome relationship. In a multisource sample of 226 employee-supervisor dyads, we found that overqualified employees were significantly more likely to withdraw from their work and intend to exit if (a) their job provided little autonomy or (b) if they engaged in low levels of job crafting. When individuals experienced high levels of autonomy or engaged in high levels of job crafting, the overqualification-outcome relationship was reversed (or non-significant). Moreover, autonomy was positively related to job crafting. Finally, we found evidence for mediated moderation, such that the moderating effect of autonomy on the relationship between overqualification and both withdrawal and turnover intention was transmitted through job crafting. We discuss theoretical and practical implications.

Keywords

Overqualification Job crafting Autonomy Job design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Tamara Berrino and Sandra German for their help with data collection.

Funding Information

This work was supported by a grant from the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds [Swiss National Science Foundation, grant number 100019-156537] awarded to Maike E. Debus.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baillod, J., & Semmer, N. (1994). Fluktuation und Berufsverläufe bei Computerfachleuten [turnover and career paths of computer specialists]. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 38(4), 152–163.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2010). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In S. Zedeck, H. Aguinis, W. Cascio, M. Gelfand, K. Leong, S. Parker, & J. Zhou (Eds.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 51–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274–289.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105278021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bledow, R., & Frese, M. (2009). A situational judgment test of personal initiative and its relationship to performance. Personnel Psychology, 62, 229–258.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01137.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouckenooghe, D., Raja, U., & Butt, A. N. (2013). Combined effects of positive and negative affectivity and job satisfaction on job performance and turnover intentions. Journal of Psychology, 147, 105–123.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.678411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carsten, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (1987). Unemployment, job-satisfaction, and employee turnover: A meta-analytic test of the Muchinsky Model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 374–381.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.3.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cropanzano, R., James, K., & Konovsky, M. A. (1993). Dispositional affectivity as a predictor of work attitudes and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 595–606.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Debus, M. E., & Unger, D. (2017). The interactive effects of dual-earner couples’ job insecurity: Linking conservation of resources theory with crossover research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90, 225–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Debus, M. E., Sonnentag, S., Deutsch, W., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2014). Making flow happen: The effects of being recovered on work-related flow between and within days. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 713–722.  https://doi.org/10.1037/A0035881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dekker, S. W. A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1995). The effects of job insecurity on psychological health and withdrawal: A longitudinal study. Australian Psychologist, 30, 57–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00050069508259607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng, H., Guan, Y., Wu, C. H., Erdogan, B., Bauer, T., & Yao, X. (2018). A relational model of perceived overqualification: The moderating role of interpersonal influence on social acceptance. Journal of Management, 44, 3288–3310.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316668237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2008). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 328–328.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 292–339.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256782.Google Scholar
  19. Edwards, J. R. (2008). Person-environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 167–230.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, J. R., Cable, D. M., Williamson, I. O., Lambert, L. S., & Shipp, A. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802–827.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: The moderating role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 557–565.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Peiró, J. M., & Truxillo, D. M. (2011). Overqualified employees: Making the best of a potentially bad situation for individuals and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 215–232.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01330.x.
  24. Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. (2017). Language—facts and figures. Retrieved from https://www.eda.admin.ch/aboutswitzerland/en/home/gesellschaft/sprachen/die-sprachen%2D%2D-fakten-und-zahlen.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.
  25. French, J. R. P., Jr., Caplan, R. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375–411). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frese, M., Garst, H., & Fay, D. (2007). Making things happen: Reciprocal relationships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1084–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 73–96.  https://doi.org/10.5465/Amj.2011.59215085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant, A. M., & Sumanth, J. J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 927–944.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003). Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 30–42.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanisch, K. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1991). General attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An evaluation of a causal model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39, 110–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(91)90006-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harari, M. B., Manapragada, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2017). Who thinks they’re a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 28–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hui, C., Wong, A., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Turnover intention and performance in China: The role of positive affectivity, Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 735–751.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X171037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (1996). Perceived overqualification and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 435–445.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9714025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–306.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knudsen, H. K., Ducharme, L. J., & Roman, P. M. (2007). Research participation and turnover intention: An exploratory analysis of substance abuse counselors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 211–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kühnel, J., Bledow, R., & Feuerhahn, N. (2016). When do you procrastinate? Sleep quality and social sleep lag jointly predict self-regulatory failure at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 983–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kulkarni, M., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Martinez, P. G. (2015). Overqualification, mismatched qualification, and hiring decisions: Perceptions of employers. Personnel Review, 44, 529–549.  https://doi.org/10.1108/Pr-11-2013-0204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Leana, C., Appelbaum, E., & Shevchuk, I. (2009). Work process and quality of care in early childhood education: The role of job crafting. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1169–1192.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.47084651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin, B. L., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? A task-crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Academy of Management Journal, 60, 156–177.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu, D., Zhang, Z., & Wang, M. (2012). Mono-level and multilevel mediated moderation and moderated mediation: Theorization and test. In X. Chen, A. S. Tsui, & J. L. Farh (Eds.), Empirical methods in organization and management research (pp. 553–587). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Liu, Y., Song, Y., Koopmann, J., Wang, M., Chang, C. H., & Shi, J. Q. (2017). Eating your feelings? Testing a model of employees' work-related stressors, sleep quality, and unhealthy eating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 1237–1258.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ap10000209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luksyte, A., & Spitzmueller, C. (2016). When are overqualified employees creative? It depends on contextual factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 635–653.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luksyte, A., Spitzmueller, C., & Maynard, D. C. (2011). Why do overqualified incumbents deviate? Examining multiple mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 279–296.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M. F., & Russell, D. W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 509–536.  https://doi.org/10.1002/Job.389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mojza, E. J., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). Does volunteer work during leisure time buffer negative effects of job stressors? A diary study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 231–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320902986097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 627–655.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.82.5.627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403–419.  https://doi.org/10.2307/257011.Google Scholar
  55. Moyle, P. (1995). The role of negative affectivity in the stress process: Tests of alternative models. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 647–668.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 633–662.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parker, S. K., & Sprigg, C. A. (1999). Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 925–939.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Perrewé, P. L., & Zellars, K. L. (1999). An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 739–752.  https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199909%2920:5%3C739::AID-JOB1949%3E3.0.CO;2-C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.  https://doi.org/10.3758/Brm.40.3.879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.  https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Randstad. (2012). Skills mismatches and finding the right talent (incl. quarterly mobility, confidence, and job satisfaction). Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/19445179-Skills-mismatches-finding-the-right-talent-incl-quarterly-mobility-confidencejob-satisfaction.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.
  62. Reh, F. J. (2018). Learn about the cost of high employee turnover. Retrieved from https://www.thebalancecareers.com/the-high-cost-of-high-employee-turnover-2276010. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.
  63. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Semmer, N. K. (1984). Stressbezogene Tätigkeitsanalyse [Stress-oriented task analysis]. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  65. Semmer, N. K., Grebner, S., & Elfering, A. (2004). Beyond self-report: Using observational, physiological, and situation-based measures in research on occupational stress. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 3: Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies) (pp. 207–263). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: JAI.Google Scholar
  66. Semmer, N. K., Tschan, F., Meier, L. L., Facchin, S., & Jacobshagen, N. (2010). Illegitimate tasks and counterproductive work behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 70–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00416.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Solutions, L. T. (2015). Why & how people change jobs. Mountain View, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  68. Sonnentag, S., & Grant, A. M. (2012). Doing good at work feels good at home, but not right away: When and why perceived prosocial impact predicts positive affect. Personnel Psychology, 65, 495–530.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01251.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spector, P. E. (1992). A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 123–151). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  70. Spector, P. E., & Brannick, M. T. (2011). Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 287–305.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110369842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Spector, P. E., Dwyer, D. J., & Jex, S. M. (1988). Relation of job stressors to affective, health, and performance outcomes: A comparison of multiple data sources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.73.1.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Spector, P. E., Zapf, D., Chen, P. Y., & Frese, M. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Don’t throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200002)21:1<79::AID-JOB964>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Staufenbiel, T., & König, C. J. (2010). A model for the effects of job insecurity on performance, turnover intention, and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 101–117.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X401912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Staufenbiel, T., & König, C. J. (2011). An evaluation of Borg’s cognitive and affective job insecurity scales. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(20), 1–7.Google Scholar
  77. Steel, R. P., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2009). Turnover process models: Review and synthesis of a conceptual literature. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 271–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841.Google Scholar
  79. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van den Heuvel, M., Demerouti, E., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2015). The job crafting intervention: Effects on job resources, self-efficacy, and affective well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 511–532.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256902.Google Scholar
  82. Van Harrison, R. (1978). Person-environment fit and job stress. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 175–205). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  83. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Watt, J. D., & Hargis, M. B. (2010). Boredom proneness: Its relationship with subjective underemployment, perceived organizational support, and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 163–174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9138-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement-motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179–201.  https://doi.org/10.2307/259118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wrzesniewski, A., Bartel, C. A., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (in preparation). Remoteness as a resource: The impact of virtual work on job crafting. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  88. Wu, C. H., Luksyte, A., & Parker, S. K. (2015). Overqualification and subjective well-being at work: The moderating role of job autonomy and culture. Social Indicators Research, 121, 917–937.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0662-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wu, C. H., Tian, A. W., Luksyte, A., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). On the association between perceived overqualification and adaptive behavior. Personnel Review, 46, 339–354.  https://doi.org/10.1108/Pr-05-2015-0134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang, M. J., Law, K. S., & Lin, B. (2016). You think you are big fish in a small pond? Perceived overqualification, goal orientations, and proactivity at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 61–84.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations