Lay Beliefs About Attention to and Awareness of the Present: Implicit Mindfulness Theory (IMT) and Its Workplace Implications
- 568 Downloads
While mindfulness (attention to and awareness of the present) has received growing attention from scholars and practitioners, little is known regarding how employees’ lay beliefs about the fixedness versus malleability nature of mindfulness can guide their work behaviors. To address this issue, we proposed the concept of implicit mindfulness theory (IMT) and developed and validated a new measure tapping this construct (with three items in the final scale). Across six studies, we found that the new measure had satisfactory reliabilities, validities, and other psychometric properties and also proved useful in predicting individuals’ voice, production deviance, and in-role behaviors in the workplace. Some individuals in our studies were inclined to view mindfulness as a relatively fixed quality rather than as an attribute developable through time and effort investments. We also found that while IMT had a direct relationship with voice (study 4), IMT modified the relationship between feedback from others at work and production deviance (study 5) or in-role behaviors (study 6); feedback from others at work was significantly related to production deviance or in-role behaviors only among IMT entity theorists. Notably, IMT had predictive validity above and beyond a measure of dispositional mindfulness. The insights provided by our studies highlight the need to better understand the individual difference of IMT and its workplace implications.
KeywordsImplicit mindfulness theory Mindfulness Voice Feedback Production deviance In-role behaviors
We wish to thank Caitlin Porter for her comments on the paper.
- Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6220.127.116.116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25, 1189–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614527113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn, S. C., Seaker, R. F., & Waller, M. A. (1994). Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Logistics, 15, 145–172.Google Scholar
- Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E. E. (1997). Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5%3C407::AID-SMJ881%3E3.0.CO;2-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Conley, K. M., Williamson, R. L., Henderson, T. G., & Mancini, V. S. (2018). Mindfulness-based training interventions for employees: A qualitative review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.004.
- Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. –. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8.
- Gaskin, J., & Lim, J. (2016). Master validity tool: AMOS plugin. Gaskination’s StatWiki http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com.
- Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., & Yang, T. (2011). Mindfulness at work. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 30, 115–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-7301(2011)0000030005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Delhi: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. –. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1688.
- Hülsheger, U. R., Alberts, H. J. E. M., Feinholdt, A., & Lang, J. W. B. (2013). Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hülsheger, U. R., Lang, J. W. B., Depenbrock, F., Fehrmann, C., Zijlstra, F. R. H., & Alberts, H. J. E. M. (2014). The power of presence: The role of mindfulness at work for daily levels and change trajectories of psychological detachment and sleep quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1113–1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluation scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kiburz, K. M., Allen, T. D., & French, K. A. (2017). Work-family conflict and mindfulness: Investigating the effectiveness of a brief training intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 1016–1037. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2181.
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.2.326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01225.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00251-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ocasio, W. (1997). Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. F. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp. 125–154). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10182-006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh, S., & Aggarwal, Y. (2018). Happiness at work scale: Construction and psychometric validation of a measure using mixed method approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 1439–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9882-x.
- Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55, 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow-Crowne (sic) social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::aid-jclp2270280220>3.0.co;2-g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sutcliffe, K. M., Vogus, T. J., & Dane, E. (2016). Mindfulness in organizations: A cross-level review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uleman, J. S., Saribay, S. A., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wheeler, A. R., Shanine, K. K., Leon, M. R., & Whitman, M. V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wieczner, J. (2016). Meditation has become a billion-dollar business. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/03/12/meditation-mindfulness-apps/. Accessed 27 Nov 2017.