The Moderating Roles of Perceived Task Interdependence and Team Size in Transformational Leadership’s Relation to Team Identification: A Dimensional Analysis

Original Paper
First Online:
  • 232 Downloads

Abstract

This study is aimed at investigating perceived task interdependence and team size as contingencies for team leaders’ transformational leadership influence on team identification. Data were obtained from a two-phase survey among 234 employees from ten multinational pharmaceutical subsidiaries in South Korea. Each dimension of transformational leadership by team leaders relates positively to team identification. However, the impact of leadership dimensions on team identification is attenuated by distinct moderator(s): charisma by higher perceived task interdependence, individualized consideration by larger team size, and intellectual stimulation by higher perceived task interdependence or larger team size. This study’s findings help us develop a more nuanced understanding of how transformational leadership operates. This study illustrates that team leaders’ transformational influence on team identification fluctuates, depending on the team structure. Such knowledge may help inform team leader development and team-structuring strategies used by practitioners and may contribute to improving organizational team effectiveness. This is one of the first studies showing evidence that the influence of the dimensions of transformational leadership is contingent upon distinct moderators, thereby contributing to advancing the theory of transformational leadership. Further, this study, by investigating team structure as a contingency of the transformational leadership-team identification relationship, complements previous research that focused on follower characteristics. Additionally, our explicit attention to the team as both the context of leaders’ action and the target of employee identification helps us gain a more concrete understanding of team leadership and team development issues, which are particularly salient in the highly competitive pharmaceutical industry.

Keywords

Transformational leadership Team identification Task interdependence Team size 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  2. Ancona, D., & Bresman, H. (2007). X-teams: How to build teams that lead, innovate, and succeed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  3. Antonakis, J., & Atwater, L. (2002). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 673–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Johnson, S. A. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
  7. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldwin, S. A., Bauer, D. J., Stice, E., & Rohde, P. (2011). Evaluating models for partially clustered designs. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 149–165.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  13. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
  14. Bass, B. M., Waldman, D. A., Avolio, B. J., & Bebb, M. (1987). Transformational leadership and the falling dominoes effect. Group & Organization Management, 12(1), 73–87.Google Scholar
  15. Bauer, T. N., & Green, S. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In I. D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 680–726). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception thoery. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 439–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer & B. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (Vol. 214, pp. 345–360). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brickson, S. L. (2013). Athletes, best friends, and social activists: An integrative model accounting for the role of identity in organizational identification. Organization Science, 24(1), 226–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 349–444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  28. Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Carless, S. A. (1998). Assessing the discriminant validity of transformational leader behaviour as measured by the MLQ1. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71(4), 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cha, J., Kim, Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bachrach, D. G. (2015). Transformational leadership and inter-team collaboration: Exploring the mediating role of teamwork quality and moderating role of team size. Group & Organization Management, 40(6), 715–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhou, M. (2015). How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 511–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Chi, N.-W., & Pan, S.-Y. (2012). A multilevel investigation of missing links between transformational leadership and task performance: The mediating roles of perceived person-job fit and person-organization fit. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cho, J., & Dansereau, F. (2010). Are transformational leaders fair? A multi-level study of transformational leadership, justice perceptions, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1999). The model of followers' responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Christ, O., van Dick, R., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2003). When teachers go the extra mile: Foci of organisational identification as determinants of different forms of organisational citizenship behaviour among schoolteachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 329–341.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cicero, L., & Pierro, A. (2007). Charismatic leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of employees’ work-group identification. International Journal of Psychology, 42(5), 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Cogliser, C. C., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2000). Exploring work unit context and leader–member exchange: A multi-level perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 637–647.Google Scholar
  40. Courtright, S. H., Thurgood, G. R., Stewart, G. L., & Pierotti, A. J. (2015). Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1825–1846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64(11), 1425–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. De Cremer, D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2004). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Howell, J. P., & Villa, J. (2005). Substitutes for leadership, or not. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dong, L. I. U., Hui, L., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1187–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., & Shamir, B. (2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Edmondson, A. C. (2012). Teamwork on the fly. Harvard Business Review, 90(4), 72–80.Google Scholar
  49. Effelsberg, D., Solga, M., & Gurt, J. (2014). Getting followers to transcend their self-interest for the benefit of their company: Testing a core assumption of transformational leadership theory. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 459–478.Google Scholar
  51. Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). The moderating role of individual differences in the relation between transformational/transactional leadership perceptions and organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Evans, M. G. (1985). A monte carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ford, J. D. (1981). Departmental contex and formal structure as constraints on leader behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2005). One foot in each camp: The dual identification of contract workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 68–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Glynn, M. A., Kazanjian, R., & Drazin, R. (2010). Fostering innovation in complex product development settings: The role of team member identity and interteam interdependence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7), 1082–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Goodman, J. S., & Blum, T. C. (1996). Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. Journal of Management, 22(4), 627–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Goodstadt, B., & Kipnis, D. (1970). Situational influences on the use of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54(3), 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader–member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gully, S. M. (2000). Work teams research: Recent findings and future trends. In M. M. Beyerlein (Ed.), Work teams: Past, present and future (Vol. 6, pp. 25–44). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  62. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2007). Asking the right questions about leadership: Discussion and conclusions. American Psychologist, 62(1), 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hamstra, M. W., Van Yperen, N., Wisse, B., & Sassenberg, K. (2014). Transformational and transactional leadership and followers’ achievement goals. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(3), 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21(1), 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hoffman, B. J., Bynum, B. H., Piccolo, R. F., & Sutton, A. W. (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 779–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140.Google Scholar
  71. Hong, S.-K. (2010). Women power in pharma industry. ScienceMD.com. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemd.com/program/bbs/view.asp?a_num=7330017&b_num=10229
  72. House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Howell, J. M., & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Howell, J. P., Bowen, D. E., Dorfman, P. W., Kerr, S., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2007). Substitutes for leadership: Effective alternatives to ineffective leadership. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 363–376): University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  75. Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 877–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Jiang, W., Gu, Q., & Wang, G. (2015). To guide or to divide: The dual-side effects of transformational leadership on team innovation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Jiao, C., Richards, D. A., & Zhang, K. (2011). Leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: OCB-specific meanings as mediators. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kark, R., & Shamir, B. (2002). The influence of transformational leadership on followers’ relational versus collective self-concept. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2002(1), D1–D6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 246–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kearney, E. (2008). Age differences between leader and followers as a moderator of the relationship between transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 803–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kearney, E., & Gebert, D. (2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Keller, R. T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 202–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(3), 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kiggundu, M. N. (1983). Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 31(2), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J.-L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  88. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership (Vol. 3, pp. 253–291). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.Google Scholar
  89. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  90. Kreiner, G. E., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Li, N., Chiaburu, D. S., Kirkman, B. L., & Xie, Z. (2013). Spotlight on the followers: An examination of moderators of relationships between transformational leadership and subordinates’ citizenship and taking charge. Personnel Psychology, 66(1), 225–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Liang, S.-G., & Chi, S. S.-C. (2013). Transformational leadership and follower task performance: The role of susceptibility to positive emotions and follower positive emotions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because i like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., & Freiberg, S. J. (1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(3), 167–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lord, R. G., & Rowzee, M. (1979). Task interdependence, temporal phase, and cognitive heterogeneity as determinants of leadership behavior and behavior-performance relations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(2), 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Identification in work, war, sports, and religion: Contrasting the benefits and risks. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31(2), 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Mitchell, R. J., Parker, V., & Giles, M. (2011). When do interprofessional teams succeed? Investigating the moderating roles of team and professional identity in interprofessional effectiveness. Human Relations, 64(10), 1321–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183–191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2011). Mplus statistical modeling software: Version 6.11. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  106. O'Connell, M. S., Doverspike, D., & Cober, A. B. (2002). Leadership and semiautonomous work team performance: A field study. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Oreg, S., & Berson, Y. (2011). Leadership and employees’ reactions to change: The role of leaders’ personal attributes and transformational leadership style. Personnel Psychology, 64(3), 627–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Parisi-Carew, E. (2011, November 1). Why do teams fail - and what to do about it. Human Resource Executive Online. Retrieved from http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/view/story.jhtml?id=533342576
  109. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Paulsen, N., Maldonado, D., Callan, V. J., & Ayoko, O. (2009). Charismatic leadership, change and innovation in an R&D organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(5), 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 838–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behavior: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310.Google Scholar
  114. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259–298.Google Scholar
  115. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171–207). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Purvanova, R. K., & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Reid, S. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(6), 804–817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Riketta, M., & van Dick, R. (2005). Foci of attachment in organizations: A meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 490–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sargent, L. D., & Sue-Chan, C. (2001). Does diversity affect group efficacy? Small Group Research, 32(4), 426–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020–1030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Shamir, B. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (2000). Leadership and social identification in military units: Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(3), 612–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  130. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709–1721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sluss, D. M., Ployhart, R. E., Cobb, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2012). Generalizing newcomers’ relational and organizational identifications: Processes and prototypicality. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 949–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Jr., et al. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Smith, L. G. E., Amiot, C. E., Callan, V. J., Terry, D. J., & Smith, J. R. (2012). Getting new staff to stay: The mediating role of organizational identification. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 45–64.Google Scholar
  137. Solansky, S. T. (2011). Team identification: A determining factor of performance null. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(3), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Somech, A., Desivilya, H. S., & Lidogoster, H. (2009). Team conflict management and team effectiveness: The effects of task interdependence and team identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(3), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Song, J.-H. (2010). Comparison between multinational and local pharma: Female employee ratio and compensation. Newsmp.com .
  140. Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Rafferty, A. E. (2009). Proactivity directed toward the team and organization: The role of leadership, commitment and role-breadth self-efficacy. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Tabrizi, B. (2015, June 23). 75% of cross-functional teams are dysfunctional [Harvard Business Review blog]. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/06/75-of-cross-functional-teams-are-dysfunctional
  142. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  143. Thompson, L. (2013). Creative conspiracy: The new rules of breakthrough collaboration. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  144. Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Ullrich, J., Wieseke, J., Christ, O., Schulze, M., & Van Dick, R. (2007). The identity-matching principle: Corporate and organizational identification in a franchising system. British Journal of Management, 18, S29–S44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 532–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B., & van de Vliert, E. (1998). Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group & Organization Management, 23(2), 124–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B., & van de Vliert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. van der Vegt, G. S., & van de Vliert, E. (2005). Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. Journal of Management, 31(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. van der Vegt, G. S., van de Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1078–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic–transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 825–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. van Knippenberg, D., & van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Vecchio, R. P., Justin, J. E., & Pearce, C. L. (2008). The utility of transactional and transformational leadership for predicting performance and satisfaction within a path-goal theory framework. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (1978). On the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 17–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Wageman, R. (2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12(5), 559–577.Google Scholar
  159. Wageman, R., Gardner, H., & Mortensen, M. (2012). The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of ceo transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility*. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Waldman, D. A., & Yammarino, F. J. (1999). Ceo charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 266–285.Google Scholar
  162. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., & Zhu, W. C. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 793–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Wang, H., Law, K. S., Hackett, R. D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z. X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Wang, P., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2007). Family-friendly programs, organizational commitment, and work withdrawal: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Personnel Psychology, 60(2), 397–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Wang, X.-H., & Howell, J. M. (2010). Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1134–1144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Wang, X.-H., & Howell, J. M. (2012). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Wu, J. B., Tsui, A. S., & Kinicki, A. J. (2010). Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, 43(10), 975–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Yorges, S. L., Weiss, H. M., & Strickland, O. J. (1999). The effect of leader outcomes on influence, attributions, and perceptions of charisma. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 428–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Yukl, G. A. (2005). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  172. Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 451–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Zhang, Z., Wang, M. O., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Daniels College of BusinessUniversity of DenverDenverUSA
  2. 2.HEC MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations