Can Being Gay Provide a Boost in the Hiring Process? Maybe If the Boss is Female
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether men and women differentially prefer hiring gay and lesbian job applicants relative to equally qualified heterosexual job applicants.
Data were collected from two samples of non-student participants. Each participant evaluated the perceived hirability of an ostensibly real job applicant by reviewing the applicant’s resume. In reality, all participants were randomly assigned to evaluate the same fictitious resume that differed only in the gender and sexual orientation of the applicant.
We find that men perceived gay and lesbian job applicants as less hirable, while women perceived gay and lesbian job applicants as more hirable than heterosexual job applicants. Additionally, we show perceptions of hirability are mediated by perceptions of gay and lesbian job applicants’ competence.
These results show that bias against gays and lesbians is much more nuanced than previous work suggests. One implication is that placing more women in selection roles within organizations could be a catalyst for the inclusion of gay and lesbian employees. Additionally, these results could influence when and how gays and lesbians disclose their gay identities at work.
These studies are the first to identify a positive bias in favor of gay and lesbian job applicants. As attitudes toward gays and lesbians become more positive, results like these are important to document as they signal a shift in intergroup relations. These results will also help managers and organizations design selection processes to minimize bias toward applicants.
KeywordsSexual Orientation Female Participant Heterosexual Woman Participant Gender Simple Effect Analysis
- Cunningham, G. B., Sartore, M. L., & McCullough, B. P. (2010). The influence of sexual orientation, applicant gender, and rater gender on ascribed attributions and hiring recommendations of personal trainers. Journal of Sport Management, 24, 400–415.Google Scholar
- Davidson, M., & Burke, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Women in management worldwide: Progress and prospects. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Grigoriou, T. (2004). Friendship between gay men and heterosexual women: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. London: London South Bank University, Families and Social Capital ESRC Research Group.Google Scholar
- Kite, M. E. (1994). When perceptions meet reality: Individual differences in reactions to lesbians and gay men. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on gay and lesbian issues (Vol. 1, pp. 25–43)., Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Myers, S. L. (2000). Survey of troops finds antigay bias common in service. The New York Times, March 25, C19.Google Scholar
- Newport, F. (2011). For First Time, Majority of Americans Favor Legal Gay Marriage. Gallop. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/first-time-majority-americans-favor-legal-gay-marriage.aspx
- Obergefell v. Hodges, 576. U.S. ___ (2015).Google Scholar
- Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.Google Scholar
- Taylor, H. (2002). Workplace discrimination against, and jokes about, African Americans, gays, Jews, Muslims, and others. New York: Harris Interactive.Google Scholar