Behavioral Expression of Job Interview Anxiety
- 4.4k Downloads
The aim of this study was to investigate (a) the behavioral cues that are displayed by, and trait judgments formed about, anxious interviewees, and (b) why anxious interviewees receive lower interview performance ratings. The Behavioral Expression of Interview Anxiety Model was created as a conceptual framework to explore these relations.
We videotaped and transcribed mock job interviews, obtained ratings of interview anxiety and interview performance, and trained raters to assess several verbal and nonverbal cues and trait judgments.
The results indicated that few behavioral cues, but several traits were related to interviewee and interviewer ratings of interview anxiety. Two factors emerged from our factor analysis on the trait judgments—Assertiveness and Interpersonal Warmth. Mediation analyses were performed and indicated that Assertiveness and Interpersonal Warmth mediated the relation between interview anxiety and interview performance. Speech rate (words spoken per minute) and Assertiveness were found to mediate the relation between interviewee and interviewer ratings of interview anxiety.
Overall, the results indicated that interviewees should focus less on their nervous tics and more on the broader impressions that they convey. Our findings indicate that anxious interviewees may want to focus on how assertive and interpersonally warm they appear to interviewers.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to use a validated interview anxiety measure to examine behavioral cues and traits exhibited by anxious interviewees. We offer new insight into why anxious interviewees receive lower interview performance ratings.
KeywordsInterview anxiety Interview performance Person perception Job interview
Special thanks to Monika Nadj for her contribution with developing an earlier version of the micro cue scale. This research was supported by a Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to Deborah Powell.
- Andersen, P., Hecht, M., Hoobler, G., & Smallwood, M. (2002). Nonverbal communication across cultures. In W. B. Gudykunst & B. Mody (Eds.), Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication (2nd ed., pp. 89–106). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Chambers, R. L., & Skinner, C. J. (Eds.). (2003). Analysis of survey data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Heck, R. (2001). Multilevel modeling with SEM. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 89–127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Huffcutt, A. I., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Roth, P. L. (2011). Understanding applicant behavior in employment interviews: A theoretical model of interviewee performance. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 353–367.Google Scholar
- Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Klie, S. (2008). More men in HR would boost profession: Survey. Canadian HR Reporter, 21, 12.Google Scholar
- Leary, M. R. (1983). Understanding social anxiety: Social, personality and clinical perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Levine, S. P., & Feldman, R. S. (2002). Women and men’s nonverbal behavior and self- monitoring in a job interview setting. Applied H.R.M Research, 7, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Oliver, T., Hausdorf, P., Lievens, F., & Conlon, P. (2014). Interpersonal dynamics in assessment center exercises: Effects of role player portrayed disposition. Journal of Management,0149206314525207.Google Scholar