The Associations between Ethical Organizational Culture, Burnout, and Engagement: A Multilevel Study
- 2.2k Downloads
Ethical culture is a specific form of organizational culture (including values and systems that can promote ethical behavior), and as such a socially constructed phenomenon. However, no previous studies have investigated the degree to which employees’ perceptions of their organization’s ethical culture are shared within work units (departments), which was the first aim of this study. In addition, we studied the associations between ethical culture and occupational well-being (i.e., burnout and work engagement) at both the individual and work-unit levels.
The questionnaire data were gathered from 2,146 respondents with various occupations in 245 different work units in one public sector organization. Ethical organizational culture was measured with the corporate ethical virtues scale, including eight sub-dimensions.
Multilevel structural equation modeling showed that 12–27 % of the total variance regarding the dimensions of ethical culture was explained by departmental homogeneity (shared experiences). At both the within and between levels, higher perceptions of ethical culture associated with lower burnout and higher work engagement.
The results suggest that organizations should support ethical practices at the work-unit level, to enhance work engagement, and should also pay special attention to work units with a low ethical culture because these work environments can expose employees to burnout.
This is one of the first studies to find evidence of an association between shared experiences of ethical culture and collective feelings of both burnout and work engagement.
KeywordsEthical organizational culture Well-being Multilevel study Burnout Work engagement
This paper is based on a research project supported by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (Grant No. 110104) and it has received funding from the Finnish National Doctoral Program of Psychology.
- Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32, 73–88.Google Scholar
- Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P. J., & Driscoll, M. P. (2001). Organizational stress: A review and critique of theory, research and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cox, T., Kuk, G., & Leiter, M. P. (1993). Burnout, health, work stress and organisational healthiness. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marek (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 177–197). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Feldt, T., Rantanen, J., Hyvönen, K., Mäkikangas, A., Huhtala, M., Pihlajasaari, P., et al. (2013). The 9-Item Bergen Burnout Inventory: Factorial validity across organisations and measurements of longitudinal data. Industrial Health,. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2013-0059.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress: Objective vs. subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In C. L. Cooper & R. Payne (Eds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375–411). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gully, S., Incalcaterra, K., Joshi, A., & Beaubien, J. (2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 102–117). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Heck, R. (2001). Multilevel modeling with SEM. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 89–127). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Hsu, H. (2009). Testing the effectiveness of various commonly used fit indices for detecting misspecifications in multilevel structural equation models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Retrieved from http://repository.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-12-7411.
- Huhtala, M. (2013). Virtues that work: Ethical organisational culture as a context for occupational well-being and personal work goals. Doctoral thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä. Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 479. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-5360-7.
- Kahn, R. L., & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 571–650). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Psychological stress in the workplace. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewé (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook (pp. 3–14). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maslach, C. (1993). Burnout: A multidimensional perspective. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marek (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research (pp. 19–32). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Mauno, S., De Cuyper, N., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., & Mäkikangas, A. (2014). Occupational well-being as a mediator between job insecurity and turnover intention: Findings at the individual and work department levels. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(3). doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.752896.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Näätänen, P., Aro, A., Matthiesen, S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2003). Bergen Burnout Indicator 15. Helsinki: Edita.Google Scholar
- Salmela-Aro, K., Rantanen, J., Hyvönen, K., Tilleman, K., & Feldt, T. (2011). Bergen Burnout Inventory: Reliability and validity among Finnish and Estonian managers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 84(6), 635–645. doi: 10.1007/s00420-010-0594-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schein, E. H. (1999). The corporate culture survival guide: Sense and nonsense about culture change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, C., O’Donnell, P., Taylor, C., Farrar, A., Danis, M., & Grady, C. (2007). Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States. Social Science and Medicine, 65(8), 1708–1719. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.050.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar