What Makes Us Enthusiastic, Angry, Feeling at Rest or Worried? Development and Validation of an Affective Work Events Taxonomy Using Concept Mapping Methodology
- 1.1k Downloads
Affective events theory (AET) highlights the importance of work events as antecedents of distinct emotions, attitudes, and work behavior. However, few attempts have been made to systematically classify positive and negative work events. The aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive taxonomy of affective work events to provide a common frame of reference for future research and to improve communication among researchers regarding research on affective work events.
Design and Methodological Approach
Positive and negative affective work events were sampled from employees using a diary study design. We used concept mapping methodology as an exploratory approach to analyze the data on affective work events.
Two hundred eighteen employees reported 559 positive and 383 negative affective work events. We identified four positive and seven negative event clusters. Each event cluster showed a unique relationship with distinct affective states, even when controlling for the occurrence of events without clustering and trait affect. The results support the validity of our taxonomy.
This study contributes to previous literature by providing a comprehensive yet parsimonious classification of both positive and negative affective work events. The affective work event clusters found reflect personal values of agency and communion. This classification of affective events as reflecting agentic and communal values provides a starting point for the integration of findings from previous studies.
Originality and Value
The taxonomy developed in this study provides an integrative approach and a basis for future research to more differentially investigate relationships proposed by AET.
KeywordsAffective events theory Affective work events Affect at work Concept mapping methodology Values
We thank Cynthia Fisher, Sabine Sonnentag, Wendong Li, and Anya Johnson for their helpful suggestions and comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
- Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 120–136). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Basch, J., & Fisher, C. D. (2000). Affective events–emotions matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. In Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E. J., Zerbe, W. J. (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory and practice (pp. 33–48). Westport: Quorum Books, Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (1997). Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- De Dreu, C. K. W., Harink, F., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (1999). Conflict and performance in groups and organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 369–414). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dong, J., Martin, S., & Waldo, P. (2001). A user input and analysis tool for information architecture. Paper presented at the CHI ‘01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
- Elfenbein, H. A. (2007). Emotion in organizations: A review in stages. In A. Brief & J. Walsh (Eds.), Annals of the academy of management (Vol. 1, pp. 315–386). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: OH World Publishing.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 467–511). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 55–89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913.Google Scholar
- Kane, M., Trochim, M. K., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation (Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., & Rodgers, B. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6. Chicago: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
- Romesburg, H. C. (2004). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont: Lifetime Learning Publications.Google Scholar
- Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–318). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2003). Stress in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 453–491). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.Google Scholar
- Yukl, G. A. (2001). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Zacher, H., Degner, M., Seevaldt, R., Frese, M., & Lüdde, J. (2009). Was wollen jüngere und ältere Erwerbstätige erreichen? Altersbezogene Unterschiede in den Inhalten und Merkmalen beruflicher Ziele [What do younger and older workers want to accomplish? Age-related differences in content and characteristics of occupational goals]. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 8, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar