The Mediating Role of Discrete Emotions in the Relationship Between Injustice and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: A Study in Pakistan
- 1.3k Downloads
Our study explores the mediating role of discrete emotions in the relationships between employee perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice, regarding an annual salary raise, and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs).
Survey data were provided by 508 individuals from telecom and IT companies in Pakistan. Confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and bootstrapping were used to test our hypothesized model.
We found a good fit between the data and our tested model. As predicted, anger (and not sadness) was positively related to aggressive CWBs (abuse against others and production deviance) and fully mediated the relationship between perceived distributive injustice and these CWBs. Against predictions, however, neither sadness nor anger was significantly related to employee withdrawal.
Our findings provide organizations with an insight into the emotional consequences of unfair HR policies, and the potential implications for CWBs. Such knowledge may help employers to develop training and counseling interventions that support the effective management of emotions at work. Our findings are particularly salient for national and multinational organizations in Pakistan.
This is one of the first studies to provide empirical support for the relationships between in/justice, discrete emotions and CWBs in a non-Western (Pakistani) context. Our study also provides new evidence for the differential effects of outward/inward emotions on aggressive/passive CWBs.
KeywordsInjustice Pay Emotions Counterproductive work behaviors Pakistan
- Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Allred, K. G. (1999). Anger driven retaliation: Toward an understanding of impassioned conflict in organizations. In R. Lewicki, R. Bies, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 27–58). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). AMOS version 16. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.Google Scholar
- Beugré, C. D. (2007). A cultural perspective of organizational justice. New York: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (2002). Hot flashes, open wounds: Injustice and the tyranny of its emotions. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice (pp. 203–221). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, application and programming (2nd ed.). Oxford: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
- Colquitt, J., Long, D., Rodell, J., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. (2010). Reactions to justice vs. injustice: An inductive study. In J. Colquitt & J. Greenberg (Chairs.), Are justice and injustice qualitatively distinct concepts? Symposium paper presented at the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
- Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunnelling through the maze. In C. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317–372). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cropanzano, R., Stein, J. H., & Nadisic, T. (2011). Social justice and the experience of emotion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- De Cremer, D. (2007). Justice and affect: When two friends meet. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of justice and affect (pp. 1–11). Greenwich: IAP.Google Scholar
- Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg & J. Colquitt (Eds.), The Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J. (2001b). The seven loose cannons of organizational justice. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 245–271). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78, 269–303.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures’ consequence: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1983). Theft by employees. Lexington, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
- Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Iacobucci, D. (2008). Mediation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Khan, A. K. (2009, 18–20 May). Assessing the dimensionality of organizational justice: Evidence from Pakistani context. Paper presented at the Workshop for Research Advances in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. University of Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
- Kihlstrom, J. F., Eich, E., Sandbrand, D., & Tobias, B. A. (2000). Emotion and memory: Implications for self-report. In A. A. Stone, J. S. Turkkan, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 81–100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1991a). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S., & Cohen-Charash, Y. (2001). Discrete emotions in organizational life. In R. L. Payne & G. L. Cooper (Eds.), Emotions at work: Theory, research and applications for management (pp. 45–81). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1997). Aggression in the workplace. In R. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in the workplace (pp. 37–67). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rego, A., & Cunha, M. (2010). Organisational justice and citizenship behaviors: A study in the Portuguese cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 404–430.Google Scholar
- Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Spielberger, C. D. (1988). Professional manual for the State–Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) (research ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Tangney, J. P., & Salovey, P. (1999). Problematic social emotions: Shame, guilt, jealousy, and envy. In R. M. Kowalski & M. R. Leary (Eds.), The social psychology of emotional and behavioral problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology (pp. 167–195). Washington, DC: APA Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van den Bos, K. (2001a). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived unfairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72–81.Google Scholar
- Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X manual for the positive and negative affect schedule. Iowa: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
- Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar