Team–Member Exchange and Work Engagement: Does Personality Make a Difference?

Anand, S., Vidyarthi, P., Liden, R., & Rousseau, (2010). Good citizens in poor-quality relationships: Idiosyncratic deals as a substitute for relationship quality. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 970–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 245–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Employee engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work and Stress, 22, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big-Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behson, S., Eddy, E., & Lorenzet, S. (2000). The importance of the critical psychological states in the job characteristics model: A meta-analytic and structural equations modeling examination. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5, 170–189.Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: The relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 740–748.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1082–1103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. S., Schaninger, W. S., & Harris, S. G. (2002). The workplace social exchange network: A multilevel, conceptual examination. Group and Organization Management, 27, 142–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1957). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). Good business: Leadership, flow and the making of meaning. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Demerouti, E. (2006). Job characteristics, flow, and performance: The moderating role of conscientiousness. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 266–280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dollard, M., & Bakker, A. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 579–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmondson, A. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C. (2004). Work value congruence and intrinsic career success: The compensatory roles of leader–member exchange and perceived organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 57, 305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2006). Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader–member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 36, 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagne′, M., & Deci, E. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallup. (2010). Employee engagement. Retrieved October 28, 2010 from http://www.gallup.com/consulting/52/employee-engagement.aspx

Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grace, J. B., & Bollen, K. A. (2005). Interpreting the results from multiple regression and structural equation models. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 86, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, M., Parker, S., & Neal, A. (2008). Is behavioral engagement a distinct and useful construct? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and practice (pp. 102–117). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1452–1465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Harrison, D. A., Johns, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2000). Changes in technology, teamwork, diversity: New directions for a new century of absenteeism research. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 18, pp. 43–91). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Ickes, W., Snyder, M., & Garcia, S. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165–195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inceoglu, I., & Warr, P. (2011). Personality and job engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10, 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iverson, R. D., Olekalns, M., & Erwin, P. J. (1998). Affectivity, organizational stressors, and absenteeism: A causal model of burnout and its consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 797–807.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be full there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45, 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1286–1298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Kanfer, R., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Motivation traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1–56.Google Scholar

Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kim, H., Shin, K., & Swanger, N. (2009). Burnout and engagement: A comparative analysis using the Big Five personality dimensions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., & Mäkikangas, A. (2008). Testing the effort-reward imbalance model among Finnish managers: The role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 114–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Klein, K., Lim, B.-C., Saltz, J., & Mayer, D. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 952–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langelaan, S., Bakker, A. B., van Doornen, L., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and employee engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapierre, L. M., & Hackett, R. D. (2007). Trait conscientiousness, leader–member exchange, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A test of an integrative model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen, R. J., & Ketelaar, T. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Law, K. S., Wong, C., & Mobley, W. H. (1998). Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review, 23, 741–755.Google Scholar

Levin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader–member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43–72.Google Scholar

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Liu, Y., Keller, R. T., & Shih, H.-A. (2011). The impact of team–member exchange, differentiation, team commitment, and knowledge sharing on R&D project team performance. R&D Management, 41, 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, D., Zhang, Z., & Wang, M. (2012). Mono-level and multilevel mediated moderation and moderated mediation: Theorization and test. In X. Chen, A. Tsui, and L. Farh (Eds.), Management research methods (2nd edn, in Chinese; pp. 545–579). Beijing, China: Peking University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1293–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Love, M. S., & Forret, M. (2008). Exchange relationships at work: An examination of the relationship between team–member exchange and supervisor reports of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14, 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Major, D. A., Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., & Gardner, P. D. (1995). A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 418–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & John, O. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 174–214.Google Scholar

Mendoza-Denton, R., Ayduk, O., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Testa, A. (2001). Person × situation interactionism in self-encoding (I Am… When…): Implications for affect regulation and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 533–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 6, 20–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moon, H. (2001). The two faces of conscientiousness: Duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 533–540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2002). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar

Newman, D. A., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Been there, bottled that: Are state and behavioral employee engagement new and useful construct “wine?”. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ng, T. W. H., & Sorensen, K. L. (2008). Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis. Group Organization Management, 33, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nixon, A., Yang, L. Q., Spector, P. E., & Zhang, X. C. (2011). Emotional labor in China: Examining moderators and consequences of the emotional labor process. Stress and Health, 27, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Oysterman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H. (2002). Cultural psychology, a new look: Reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ren, F. (2009). Perceived organizational support, work engagement and employee performance: Structural equation modeling analysis. Unpublished master thesis, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.Google Scholar

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Rich, B., LePine, J., & Crawford, E. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saks, A. M. (2008). The meaning and bleeding of employee engagement: How muddy is the water? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 40–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217–1227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). UWES-Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Test manual. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, http://www.schaufeli.com

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonza′lez-Roma′, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, L. L. (2006). Self-reported emotional intelligence as an indicator of social exchange quality at work. Unpublished dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar

Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A natural occurring quasi-experiment. Group and Organization Management, 20, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seppala, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., et al. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Study, 10, 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kosugi, S., Suzuki, A., Nashiwa, H., Kato, A., et al. (2008). Employee engagement in Japan: Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 510–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, employee engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between non-work and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 518–528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Tse, H. H. M., & Dasborough, M. T. (2008). A study of exchange and emotions in team member relationships. Group & Organization Management, 33, 194–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 267–296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Weigl, M., Hornung, S., Parker, S., Petru, R., Glaser, J., & Angerer, P. (2010). Work engagement accumulation of task, social, personal resources: A three-wave structural equation model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, Y., & Gan, Y. (2005). The Chinese version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale An examination of reliability and validity. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13, 268–270.Google Scholar