Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 375–394 | Cite as

Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis

  • David P. Costanza
  • Jessica M. Badger
  • Rebecca L. Fraser
  • Jamie B. Severt
  • Paul A. Gade
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Differences among generations on a wide variety of outcomes are of increasing interest to organizations, practitioners, and researchers alike. The goal of this study was to quantitatively assess the research on generational differences in work-related attitudes and to provide guidance for future research and practice.

Design/Methodology/Approach

We conducted a meta-analysis of generational differences on three work-related criteria: job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intent to turnover. Our review of published and unpublished research found 20 studies allowing for 18 generational pairwise comparisons across four generations (Traditionals, Baby Boomers, Generation Xers, and Millennials) on these outcomes using 19,961 total subjects.

Findings

Corrected mean differences for job satisfaction ranged from .02 to .25, for organizational commitment they ranged from −.22 to .46, and for intent to turnover the range was −.62 to .05. The pattern of results indicates that the relationships between generational membership and work-related outcomes are moderate to small, essentially zero in many cases.

Implications

The findings suggest that meaningful differences among generations probably do not exist on the work-related variables we examined and that the differences that appear to exist are likely attributable to factors other than generational membership. Given these results, targeted organizational interventions addressing generational differences may not be effective.

Originality/Value

This is the first known quantitative review of research on generational differences in the workplace.

Keywords

Generational differences Meta-analysis Job satisfaction Organizational commitment Intent to turnover 

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

  1. Arnold, H. J., & Feldman, D. C. (1982). A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 350–360. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedeian, A. G., Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Age, tenure, and job satisfaction: A tale of two perspectives. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 33–48. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(92)90045-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beutell, N. J., & Wittig-Berman, U. (2008). Work-family conflict and work-family synergy for Generation X, Baby Boomers, and Matures: Generational differences, predictors, and satisfaction outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(5), 507–523. doi:10.1108/02683940810884513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke, M. E. (2004). Generational differences survey report. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resources Management.Google Scholar
  5. *Carley, P. J. (2009). Generational perceptions of leadership behaviors and job satisfaction among healthcare professionals in Western New England. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(1), 245.Google Scholar
  6. Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2001). Personality development across the life course: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12(2), 49–66. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1202_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. *Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organization values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906. doi:10.1108/02683940810904385.Google Scholar
  10. *Chan, D. S. (2006). Relationship between generation-responsive leadership behaviors and job satisfaction of Generations X and Y professionals. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 66(10), 3712.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, M. H., Hair, J. F., & Rocco, T. S. (2009). The older-worker–younger supervisor dyad: A test of the reverse pygmalion effect. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 21–41. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coupland, D. (1991). Generation X: Tales for an accelerated culture. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  14. *Curry, C. J. (2008). Predicting the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic job factors on overall job satisfaction for Generation X and Baby Boomers in a regional healthcare organization. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 68(12), 8435.Google Scholar
  15. *D’Amato, A., & Herzfeldt, R. (2008). Learning orientation, organizational commitment and talent retention across generations: A study of European managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 929-953. doi:10.1108/02683940810904402.Google Scholar
  16. *Daboval, J. M. (1998). A comparison between baby boomer and generation × employees’ bases and foci of commitment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 59(2), 543.Google Scholar
  17. *Davis, J. B., Pawlowski, S. D., & Houston, A. (2006). Work commitments of Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers in the IT profession: Generational differences or myth? The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(3), 43–49.Google Scholar
  18. Dencker, J. C., Joshi, A., & Martocchio, J. J. (2008). Towards a theoretical framework linking generational memories to workplace attitudes and behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 180–187. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. *Dilworth, J. E. L., & Kingsbury, N. (2005). Home-to-Job Spillover for Generation X, Boomers, and Matures: A Comparison. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26(2), 267–281. doi:10.1007/s10834-005-3525-9.Google Scholar
  20. *Dudley, C. M., Burnfield-Geimer, J., & Erdheim, J. (2009, April). Generational differences in federal government employee attitudes and perceptions. Paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  21. *Eaton, D. E. (2009). An investigation of generational differences in job satisfaction in a bureaucratic environment. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(11), 4403.Google Scholar
  22. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. *Faulk, M. A. (1997). Personal and generational correlates of work outcomes: An inter-generational exploration. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 58(4), 1360.Google Scholar
  25. Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287–322. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00605.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gade, P. A. (1991). Military service and the life-course perspective: A turning point for military personnel research. Military Psychology, 3(4), 187–199. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp0304_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gade, P. A. (2009). The human dimension: Life course theory and research. Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral Sciences.Google Scholar
  28. Giancola, F. (2006). The generation gap: more myth than reality. Human Resource Planning, 29(4), 32–37.Google Scholar
  29. Hamblett, C., & Deverson, J. (1965). Generation X. London: Tandem Books.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Healy, M. C., Lehman, M., & McDaniel, M. A. (1995). Age and voluntary turnover: A quantitative review. Personnel Psychology, 48, 335–345. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01760.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. *Hess, J. & Jepsen, D. M. (2009). Career stage and generational differences in psychological contracts. Career Development International, 14(3), 261–283. doi:10.1108/13620430910966433.
  33. *Hollman, P. J. (2009). Generational membership and organizational commitment in a Fortune 100 firm. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(8), 3212.Google Scholar
  34. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  35. Hu, J., Herrick, C., & Hodgin, K. A. (2004). Managing the multigenerational nursing team. The Health Care Manager, 23(4), 334–340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hui-Chun, Y., & Miller, P. (2003). The generation gap and cultural influence: A Taiwan empirical investigation. Cross-Cultural Management, 10, 23–41. doi:10.1108/13527600310797621.Google Scholar
  37. Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 459–473. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hunt, J. W., & Saul, P. N. (1975). The relationship of age, tenure, and job satisfaction in males and females. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 690–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  40. International Labour Organization. (2010). LABORSTA [Database]. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/global/What_we_do/Statistics/lang-en/index.htm.
  41. Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2000). Generation X and the public employee. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), 55–74.Google Scholar
  44. Jurkiewicz, C. L., & Brown, R. G. (1998). Generational comparisons of public employee motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18(4), 18–37. doi:10.1177/0734371X9801800403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1989). Theoretical and methodological considerations in the age-job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 201–207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kowske, B. J., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generation effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 265–279. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9171-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Landry, D. J. (2009). Effects of generational and gender differences on the use of influence tactics. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(2), 613.Google Scholar
  49. Le, H., Schmidt, F. L., Harter, J. K., & Lauver, K. J. (2010). The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(2), 112–125. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. *Leiter, M. P., Jackson, N. J., & Shaughnessy, K. (2009). Contrasting burnout, turnover intention, control, value congruence, and knowledge sharing between Baby Boomers and Generation X. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(1), 100–109. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00884.x.Google Scholar
  51. *Macky, K., Forsyth, S., & Boxall, P. (2010) Generational differences at work: The impact of cohort on work attitudes and outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  52. Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008a). Generational differences at work [special issue]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 857–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008b). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 857–861. doi:10.1108/02683940810904358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MacLean, A., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2007). Military service in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 175–196. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In K. Mannheim (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–322). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McDaniel, M. A., Rothstein, H. R., & Whetzel, D. L. (2006). Publication bias: A case study of four test vendors. Personnel Psychology, 59, 927–953. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00059.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. *Miller, E. J. (2007). The effect of rewards, commitment, organizational climate and work values on intentions to leave: Is there a difference among generations? Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(1), 259.Google Scholar
  60. *Moody, A. (2008). Examining and exploring generational differences by understanding commitment, employee satisfaction, and motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(1), 286.Google Scholar
  61. Morrow, P. C., & McElroy, J. C. (1987). Work commitment and job satisfaction over three career stages. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 330–346. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(87)90009-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mottaz, C. J. (1987). Age and work satisfaction. Work and Occupations, 14(3), 23. doi:10.1177/0730888487014003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Murphy, E. F., Gordon, J. D., & Anderson, T. L. (2004). Cross-cultural, cross-cultural age and cross-cultural generational differences in values between the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 9, 21–47.Google Scholar
  64. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–422. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2009). Re-examining the relationship between age and voluntary turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 283–294. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63, 677–718. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01184.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 979–987. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00268-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parasuraman, S. (1982). Predicting turnover intentions and turnover behavior: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 111–121. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(82)90056-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parry, E., & Urwin, P. (2010). Generational differences in work values: A review of theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 79–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. *Patalano, C. (2008). A study of the relationship between generational group identification and organizational commitment: Generation X vs. Generation Y. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 69(2), 671.Google Scholar
  71. Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 328–367. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 472–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rind, B., Tromovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 22–53. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Veichtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rodriguez, R. O., Green, M. T., & Ree, M. J. (2003). Leading generation X: Do the old rules apply? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(4), 67–75. doi:10.1177/107179190300900406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roth, P. L., Huffcutt, A. I., & Bobko, P. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 694–705. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias as a threat to validity. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Ryder, N. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843–861.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sackett, P. R. (2002). Letter report. Washington, DC: The National Academies, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education.Google Scholar
  80. Sayers, R. (2007). The right staff from X to Y: Generational change and professional development in future academic libraries. Library Management, 28(8/9), 474–487. doi:10.1108/01435120710837765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(5), 529–540. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schmidt, F. L., & Le, H. (2004). Software for the Hunter–Schmidt meta-analysis methods. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organizations.Google Scholar
  83. Shapira, I. (2009). Speaking to Generation Nexus: Guru explains Gens X, Y, Boomer to one another. The Washington Post, July 9, C1.Google Scholar
  84. Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 363–382. doi:10.1002/job.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
  86. *Sujdak, E. J. (2003). An investigation of the correlation of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, perceived job opportunity, organizational communications, job search behavior, and the intent to turnover in IT professionals. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 63(8), 2940.Google Scholar
  87. Szamosi, K. T. (2006). Just what are tomorrow’s SME employees looking for? Education+Training, 48(8–9), 654–665. doi:10.1108/00400910610710074.Google Scholar
  88. TIME. (1951). The younger generation. TIME, LVIII. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,856950-1,00.html.
  89. Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 859–883. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010a). Rethinking “Generation Me” [special section]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 58–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010b). Rethinking “Generation Me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 58–75. doi:10.1177/1745691609356789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Trzesniewski, K., H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2008). Do today’s young people really think they are so extraordinary? An examination of secular trends in narcissism and self-enhancement. Psychological Science, 19(2), 181–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02065.x.
  93. Twenge, J. M. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1007–1021. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36, 1117–1142. doi:10.1177/0149206309352246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Birth cohort differences in the monitoring the future dataset and elsewhere. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 81–88. doi:10.1177/1745691609357015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00507.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Twenge, J. M., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2002). Age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and birth cohort difference on the children’s depression inventory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(4), 578–588. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wanous, J. P., & Hudy, M. J. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361–375. doi:10.1177/109442810144003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Westerman, J. W., & Yamamura, J. H. (2007). Generational preferences for work environment fit: Effects on employee outcomes. Career Development International, 12(2), 150–161. doi:10.1108/13620430710733631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Westoff, C. F. (1954). Differential fertility in the United States: 1900 to 1952. American Sociological Review, 19(5), 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. White, A. T., & Spector, P. E. (1987). An investigation of age-related factors in the age-job satisfaction relationship. Psychology and Aging, 2, 261–265. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.2.3.261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. *Wieck, K. L., Dols, J., & Northam, S. (2009). What nurses want: The nurse incentives project. Nursing Economics, 27(3), 169–177.Google Scholar
  103. Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878–890. doi:10.1108/02683940810904376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David P. Costanza
    • 1
  • Jessica M. Badger
    • 1
  • Rebecca L. Fraser
    • 1
  • Jamie B. Severt
    • 1
  • Paul A. Gade
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Organizational Sciences and CommunicationThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.The U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social SciencesArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations