Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 255–269

Altering the Effects of Work and Family Conflict on Exhaustion: Telework During Traditional and Nontraditional Work Hours

Article

Abstract

Purpose

The current study investigates the impact of time and strain-based work-to-family conflict (WFC) and family-to-work conflict (FWC) on exhaustion, by considering the moderating effect of telework conducted during traditional and non-traditional work hours.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were obtained from professionals in a large computer company using survey methodology (N = 316).

Findings

Results from this study suggest that time and strain-based WFC and FWC were associated with more exhaustion, and that exhaustion associated with high WFC was worse for individuals with more extensive telework during traditional and non-traditional work hours.

Implications

This study provides managers with findings to more carefully design telework programs, showing evidence that the adverse impact of WFC/FWC on exhaustion may depend on the type of telework and level of conflict experienced. This suggests that managers may need to be more aware of the full range of characteristics which encapsulate the teleworker’s work practices before making decisions about how telework is implemented.

Originality/Value

By differentiating the timing of telework and its role on the WFC/FWC—exhaustion relationship, this study delves deeper into the contingent nature of telework and suggests that the extent of telework conducted during traditional and nontraditional work hours may play an influential role. In addition, these considerations are investigated in light of the bi-directional time-based and strain-based nature of WFC and FWC, helping to unravel some of telework’s complexities.

Keywords

Telework Flexible work Telecommuting Work–family conflict Exhaustion 

References

  1. Adams, G. A., King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1996). Relationships of job and family involvement, family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 411–420. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 278–308. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammons, S. K., & Markham, W. T. (2004). Working at home: Experiences of skilled white collar workers. Sociological Sprectrum, 24, 191–238. doi:10.1080/02732170490271744.Google Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491. doi:10.2307/259305.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 383–400. doi:10.1002/job.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 901–911. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Handbook of work stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumeister, R. E., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belanger, F. (1999). Worker’s propensity to telecommute: An empirical study. Information and Management, 35, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlson, D., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocation Behavior, 56, 249–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carson, R. L., Baumgartner, J. J., Mathews, R. A., & Tsouloupas, C. N. (2010). Emotional exhaustion, absenteeism, and turnover intentions in childcare teachers: Examining the impact of physical activity behaviors. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 905–914. doi:10.1177/1359105309360697.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., & Byrne, Z. S. (2003). The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 160–169. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2006). Employee well-being and job performance: Where we stand and where we should go. In S. McIntyre & J. Houdmont (Eds.), Occupational health psychology: European perspectives on research, education and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 83–111). Maia, Portugal: ISMAI Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Bulters, A. J. (2004). The loss spiral of work pressure, work-home interference and exhaustion: Reciprocal relations in a three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 131–149. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00030-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). Spillover and crossover of exhaustion and life satisfaction among dual-earner parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 266–289. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demerouti, E., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2007). Need for recovery, home-work interference and performance: Is lack of concentration the link? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 204–220. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Densten, I. L. (2001). Re-thinking burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 833–847. doi:10.1002/job.115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duxbury, L. E., Higgins, C. A., & Thomas, D. R. (1996). Work and family environments and the adoption of computer-supplemental work-at-home. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 1–23. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eby, L., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, A., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Etzion, D., Eden, D., & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377–585. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2004). Technology-assisted supplemental work: Construct definition and a research framework. Human Resource Management, 43, 179–200. doi:10.1002/hrm.20014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Fritz, C., Sonnentag, S., Spector, E., & McInroe, J. A. (2010). The weekend matters: Relationships between stress recovery and affective experiences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1137–1162. doi:10.1002/job.672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frone, M. R. (2000). Work-family conflict and employee psychiatric disorders: The national comorbidity survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 888–895. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524–1541. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galinski, E., Johnson, A. A., & Friedman, D. E. (1993). The work-life business case: An outline of work in progress. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Geurts, S. A. E., & Demerouti, E. (2003). Work/non-work interface: A review of theories and findings. In M. Schabracq, J. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The handbook of work and health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 279–312). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Golden, T. D. (2006). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 176–187. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Golden, T. D., & Raghuram, S. (2010). Fostering teleworker knowledge sharing: The role of altered relational and technological interactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1061–1085. doi:10.1002/job.652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1340–1350. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldsborough, R. (2000). Making telecommuting work. Commercial Law Bulletin, 15(1), 34–35.Google Scholar
  35. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2003). When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands. Organizatoinal Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 291–303. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00519-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guimaraes, T., & Dallow, P. (1999). Empirically testing the benefits, problems, and success factors for telecommuting programmes. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haar, J. M. (2006). The downside of coping: Work-family conflict, employee burnout and the moderating effects of coping strategies. Journal of Management & Organization, 12, 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, G. B., Dollard, M. F., Tuckey, M. R., Winefield, A. H., & Thompson, B. M. (2010). Job demands, work-family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in police officers: A longitudinal test of competing theories. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 237–250. doi:10.1348/096317908X401723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hobfoll, S. E. (1988). The ecology of stress. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  40. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Igbaria, M., & Guimaraes, T. (1999). Exploring differences in employee turnover intentions and its determinants among telecommuters and non-telecommuters. Journal of Management Information Systems, 6(1), 147–164.Google Scholar
  42. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. King, J. (1998). Long hours, cold dinners and vacation interrupts. Computerworld, 31, 1.Google Scholar
  44. Kohler, S. S., & Mathieu, J. E. (1993). Individual characteristics, work perceptions, and affective reactions influences on differentiated absence criteria. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 515–530. doi:10.1002/job.4030140602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior/human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 139–149. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1999). Bridging the work-family policy and productivity gap: A literature review. Community, Work and Family, 2, 7–32. doi:10.1080/13668809908414247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kraut, R. E. (1989). Telecommuting: The trade-offs of home work. Journal of Communication, 39, 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kugelmass, J. (1995). Telecommuting: A manager’s guide to flexible work arrangements. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  50. Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 13–133. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Madsen, S. R. (2003). The effects of home-based teleworking on work family conflict. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14, 35–58. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). Maslach burnout inventory manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
  53. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McCloskey, D. W., & Igbaria, M. (1998). A review of the empirical research on telecommuting and directions for future research. In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 338–358). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth & H. Thierry (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology, work psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 5–33). Hover: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  56. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2006). How family-friendly work environments affect work/family conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Labor Research, 4, 555–574. doi:10.1007/s12122-006-1020-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mirchandani, K. (1999). Legitimizing work: Telework and the gendered reification of the work-no-work dichotomy. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36(1), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mokhtarian, P. L., Handy, S. L., & Salomon, I. (1995). Methodological issues in the estimation of the travel, energy, and air quality impacts of telecommuting. Transportation Research Record A, 29A, 283–302.Google Scholar
  59. Moore, J. E. (2000a). One road to turnover: An examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(1), 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moore, J. E. (2000b). Why is this happening? A causal attribution approach to work exhaustion consequences. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 335–349. doi:10.2307/259017.Google Scholar
  61. Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nilles, J. M. (1994). Making telecommuting happen: A guide for telemanagers and telecommuters. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  63. Nippert-Eng, C. (1996a). Calendars and keys: The classification of “home” and “work”. Sociological Forum, 11, 563–582. doi:10.1007/BF02408393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nippert-Eng, C. (1996b). Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  65. O’Driscoll, M. P., Poelmans, S., Spector, P. E., Kalliath, T., Allen, T. D., Cooper, C. L., et al. (2003). Family responsive interventions, perceived organizational and supervisor support, work-family conflict, and psychological strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 10(4), 326–344. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.10.4.326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Office of National Statistics. (October, 2005). Labor market trend. Retrieved June 13, 2008 from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/platforms/lmt/.
  67. Olson, M. H. (1989). Organizational barriers to professional telework. In E. Boris & C. R. Daniels (Eds.), Historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  68. Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 432–445. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Parasuraman, S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2002). Toward reducing some critical gaps in work-family research. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 299–312. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00062-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parker, P. A., & Kulik, J. A. (1995). Burnout, self- and supervisor-rated job performance and absenteeism among nurses. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 581–599. doi:10.1007/BF01857897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pratt, J. H. (1999). 1999 Telework America National Telework Survey: Cost/benefits of teleworking to manage work/life responsibilities. Dallas, TX: International Telework Association and Council.Google Scholar
  72. Raghuram, S., Wiesenfeld, B., & Garud, R. (2003). Technology enabled work: The role of self-efficacy in determining telecommuter adjustment and structuring behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 180–198. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00040-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ramsower, R. M. (1983). Telecommuting: The organizational and behavioral effects of working at home. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
  74. Rotondo, D. M., Carlson, D. S., & Kincaid, J. F. (2003). Coping with multiple dimensions of work-family conflict. Personnel Review, 32, 275–296. doi:10.1108/00483480310467606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Kalimo, R. (1995). The general burnout inventory: A self-report questionnaire to assess burnout in the workplace. Paper presented at Work, Stress and Health’95: Creating Healthier Workplaces, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  76. Shirom, A. (2011). Job-related burnout: A review of major research foci and challenges. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 223–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  77. Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 479–493. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Standen, P., Daniels, K., & Lamond, D. (1999). The home as a workplace: Work-family interaction and psychological well-being in telework. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(4), 368–381. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.4.4.368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stephens, G. K., & Szajna, B. (1998). Perceptions and expectations: Why people choose a telecommuting work style. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(1), 70–85.Google Scholar
  81. Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010). Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 487–506. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taris, T. W. (2006). Is there a relationship between burnout and objective performance? A critical review of 16 studies. Work & Stress, 20, 316–334. doi:10.1080/02678370601065893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taris, T. W., Beckers, D. G. J., Verhoeven, L. C., Geurts, S. A. E., Kompier, M. A. J., & Linden, D. (2006). Recovery opportunities, work-home interference, and well-being among managers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 139–157. doi:10.1080/13594320500513889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Towers, I., Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Thomas, J. (2006). Time thieves and space invaders: Technology, work and the organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 593–618. doi:10.1108/09534810610686076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Valcour, P. M., & Hunter, L. W. (2005). Technology, organizations, and work-life integration. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert’s (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives (pp. 61–84). Athens: LEA Publishers.Google Scholar
  86. Venkatesh, A., & Vitalari, N. P. (1992). An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science, 38, 1687–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1999). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organization Science, 10, 777–790. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (2001). Organizational identification among virtual workers: The role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support. Journal of Management, 27, 213–229. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00096-9.Google Scholar
  89. Wittmer, J. L. S., & Martin, J. E. (2010). Emotional exhaustion among employees without social or client contact: The key role of nonstandard work schedules. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 607–623. doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9153-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. WorldatWork. (2007, February 8). Telework trendlines. Retrieved from http://www.workingfromanywhere.org/news/pr020707.html.
  91. Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 486–493. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zeytinoglu, I. U., Cooke, G. B., & Mann, S. L. (2009). Flexibility: Whose choice is it anyway? Relations Industrielles, 64(4), 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lally School of Management & TechnologyRensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI)TroyUSA

Personalised recommendations