Job Autonomy as a Predictor of Mental Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Quality-Competitive Environment
- 1.1k Downloads
This study examines the moderating role of quality-competitive environment on the relationships between job autonomy and employees’ mental well-being and organizational commitment. It also investigates the mediating role of organizational commitment on the relationship between job autonomy and mental well-being.
The proposed hypotheses were tested by hierarchical linear modeling using an archival dataset from the Workplace Employment Relations Survey, which was conducted in Great Britain in 2004 and 2005 (12,836 employees and 1,190 managers).
This study found that quality-competitive environment moderated the relationships between job autonomy and mental well-being and between job autonomy and organizational commitment. That is, job autonomy was more strongly related to mental well-being and organizational commitment in more quality-competitive organizations. The results also indicated that this moderation was partially mediated by organizational commitment.
Because job autonomy is related to employees’ mental well-being and organizational commitment, organizations need to provide their employees with job autonomy. More importantly, because these positive relationships are stronger in quality-competitive companies, organizations in a highly quality-competitive market in particular should provide their employees with more job autonomy.
This is one of the first studies that investigated the vertical fit between job autonomy and organizational contexts while focusing on individual employees’ outcomes (attitudes and mental well-being). The results were obtained by data from a nationally representative sample, allowing us to generalize the results. Additionally, since the dataset was collected from multiple sources, self-report and common-method biases are minimized.
KeywordsJob autonomy Organizational commitment Mental well-being Quality-competitive environment Mediated moderation Exchange theory Demand-control model
The present research has been conducted by the Research Grant of Kwangwoon University in 2011.
- Ahuja, M. K., Chudoba, K. M., Kacmar, C. J., McKnight, D. H., & George, J. F. (2007). It road warriors: Balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Baird, L., & Meshoulam, I. (1988). Managing two fits of strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 13, 116–128.Google Scholar
- Brockner, J., Spreitzer, G., Mishra, A., Hochwarter, W., Pepper, L., & Weinberg, J. (2004). Perceived control as an antidote to the negative effects of layoffs on survivors’ organizational commitment and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(1), 76–100.Google Scholar
- Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cooper, C. L., & Cartwright, S. (1996). Mental health and stress in the workplace: A guide for employers. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
- Department of Trade and Industry. (2005). Workplace employment relations survey 2004: Introductory note to accompany data deposit.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–641.Google Scholar
- Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2008). Organizational behavior: Key concepts, skills & best practices. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York & London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Park, R., Appelbaum, E., & Kruse, D. (2010). Employee involvement and group incentives in manufacturing companies: A multi-level analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 227–243.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2004). Simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance in HLM 2-way interactions. http://people.ku.edu/~preacher/interact/hlm2.htm.
- Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Warr, P. B. (1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wright, T. A., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2004). Commitment, psychological well-being and job performance: An examination of conservation of resources (COR) theory and job burnout. Journal of Business and Management, 9(4), 389–406.Google Scholar