Influencing Learning States to Enhance Trainee Motivation and Improve Training Transfer
This study examines a pretraining intervention to enhance transfer of training. The learning-state analog of locus of control was the target for intervention designed to impact motivation to learn which in turn would affect knowledge acquisition and the amount of posttraining practice.
Data were collected from 91 participants who received interpersonal negotiation training and completed a negotiation transfer task approximately 2 days after training.
Results supported our research model in that the pretraining intervention impacted individuals’ internal, controllable attributions (i.e., belief that success is due to effort and strategy). These controllable attributions affected trainee’s motivation to learn. Findings also showed that motivation to learn impacted the application of learning to a negotiation transfer task through its influence on the amount of posttraining practice and rehearsal activities engaged in by the trainee prior to the transfer task. The pretraining intervention also had an effect on transfer above and beyond that accounted for by motivation to learn and posttraining practice.
This study demonstrates the benefits of using attributional intervention in the pretraining period to enhance transfer of training. This study also establishes the linkage from attributional states through motivation to learn to transfer of training.
The new pretraining intervention adds to the selection of methods the training designer can employ prior to the training to facilitate transfer. This study also highlights the role of posttraining rehearsal in enhancing transfer.
KeywordsMotivation to learn Transfer of training Locus of control Learning states Pretraining intervention
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2008). Amos (Version 17.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, T. T., Ford, J. K., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Transfer of training 1988–2008: An updated review and new agenda for future research. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 41–70). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, T. T., Ford, J. K., & Naquin, S. S. (2000). Managing transfer before learning begins: Enhancing the motivation to improve work through learning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8, 23–35.Google Scholar
- Baldwin, T. T., & Magjuka, R. J. (1997). Training as an organizational episode: Pretraining influences on trainee motivation. In J. K. Ford, S. W. J. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. S. Teachout (Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 99–127). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bauer, K. N., Orvis, K. A., & Ely, K. (2010, April). Reexamining training motivation: A meta-analytic investigation of differential validity. Paper presented at the 25th annual conference of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
- Brown, K. G., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Using computer technology in training: Building an infrastructure for active learning. In K. Kraiger (Ed.), Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development (pp. 193–233). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., & Ford, J. K. (2005). Valuable disconnects in organizational learning systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Facteau, J., Dobbins, G., Russell, J., Ladd, R. T., & Kudisch, J. (1995). The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management, 21, 1–25.Google Scholar
- Fisher, S. L. (1998). The role of goal orientation in a self-regulation framework. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
- Ford, J. K., & Oswald, F. L. (2003). Understanding the dynamic learner: Linking personality traits, learning situations, and individual behavior. In A. M. Ryan & M. Barrick (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 229–260). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Huang, J. L., & Ryan, A. M. (in press). Beyond personality traits: A study of personality states and situational contingencies in customer service jobs. Personnel Psychology.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Maier, N. R. (1973). Psychology in industrial organizations (4th ed.). Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Noe, R. A. (1985). Trainee attitudes and attributes: Neglected influences of training program effectiveness. Doctoral Dissertation. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Department of Management.Google Scholar
- Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736–749.Google Scholar
- Quiñones, M. A., Ford, J. K., Sego, D. J., & Smith, E. M. (1996). The effects of individual and transfer environment characteristics on the opportunity to perform trained tasks. Training Research Journal, 1, 29–48.Google Scholar
- Rotter, J. B., Chance, J. E., & Phares, E. J. (1972). Applications of a social learning theory of personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Rhodenizer, L., & Reynolds, A. M. (2000, April). State goal orientation and team training-related processes and outcomes. Paper presented at the 15th society for industrial and organizational psychology annual conference, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Steele-Johnson, D., Mangos, P., & Heintz, P., Jr. (2001, April). Action state orientation in the context of skill learning: Effects on task perceptions, motivation, and performance. Paper presented at the 16th society for industrial and organizational psychology annual conference, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- Turner, N., Barling, J., & Zaharatos, A. (2002). Positive psychology at work. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 715–728). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar