Resistance to Socialization into Organizational Corruption: A Model of Deontic Justice
- 644 Downloads
The purpose of this article is to develop a deontic model of corruption in organizations. This model intends to explain newcomers’ resistance to socialization into corrupt practices.
This article uses deontic justice as a conceptual framework to indicate whether adherence to deontic principles could help reduce the tendency to be engaged in corrupt practices in the workplace.
The fundamental premise of the deontic model of organizational corruption is that newcomers with strong deontic principles would be more likely to resist socialization into corruption and take actions to reduce the corrupt nature of their organization than those with weak deontic principles. The model also suggests that newcomers with strong deontic principles would be more likely to leave corrupt organizations than those with weak deontic principles.
To assess the impact of deontic principles on resistance to socialization into corruption, organizational scholars could develop a scale measuring people’s adherence to deontic principles—a deonance scale. The deontic model of organizational corruption could be used to train employees in considering fairness as a moral obligation. To the extent that employees consider fairness as a moral duty, they would be less likely to engage in corrupt practices.
This article is the first to the best of my knowledge to blend together the literature on the theory of deontic justice and the literature on corruption in organizations. In this regard, the article breaks new grounds that could help organizational scholars study corruption through the lens of fairness and justice.
KeywordsCorruption Deontic agents Deontic justice Deontic theory Organizational corruption Organizational justice Socialization to corruption
- Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39–53.Google Scholar
- Ashforth, B. E., Gioa, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33, 670–684.Google Scholar
- Bond, E. J. (1996). Ethics and human well-being: An introduction to moral philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Butler, J. K., & Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19–28.Google Scholar
- Clinard, M. B., & Yeager, P. C. (1980). Corporate crime. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Collins, M. D. (1998). Criminality in the corporate organization. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1–20). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2001). Doing justice to organizational justice. In S. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 217–242). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317–372). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Folger, R. (1998). Fairness as moral virtue. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 13–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 3–33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., & Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Gerald & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J. (1998). The cognitive geometry of employee theft: Negotiating the line between taking and stealing. In R. W. Griffin, A. O’Leary-Kelly, & J. M. Collins (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 147–193). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J., & Scott, K. S. (1996). Why do workers bite the hands that feed them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 111–156.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays in moral development Volume 1: The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper Row.Google Scholar
- Lange, D. (2008). A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption control. Academy of Management Review, 33, 710–729.Google Scholar
- Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Manz, C. C., Joshi, M., & Anand V. (2005). The role of values and emotions in newcomers’ socialization into organizational corruption. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, SIM, J1–J6.Google Scholar
- Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay between logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 750–770.Google Scholar
- Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33, 730–749.Google Scholar
- Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organizational-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33, 685–709.Google Scholar
- Reiss, A. J., Jr., & Biderman, A. D. (1980). Data sources on white-collar lawbreaking. Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Science Research.Google Scholar
- Sackett, P. C., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Simpson, S. S., Paternoster, R., & Piquero, N. L. (1998). Exploring the macro-micro link in corporate crime research. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 15, 35–76.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, E. (1949). White-collar crime. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
- Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 10, 558–567.Google Scholar
- Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Vaughan, D. (1992). The macro-micro connection in white-collar crime theory. In K. Schegel & D. Weisburd (Eds.), White collar crime reconsidered (pp. 124–145). Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar