Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 293–302 | Cite as

Millennials’ Career Perspective and Psychological Contract Expectations: Does the Recession Lead to Lowered Expectations?

  • Sara De HauwEmail author
  • Ans De Vos
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of generational, contextual, and individual influences on Millennials’ career expectations.

Design/methodology/approach

Two matched samples of Millennials graduating in 2006 (n = 787) and 2009 (n = 825) filled out a questionnaire regarding their psychological contract expectations, career strategy, and optimism about the labor market in completely different socioeconomic contexts.

Findings

Recession is related to lower levels of optimism. During times of recession, Millennials lower their expectations regarding the work-life balance and social atmosphere. However, their expectations regarding job content, training, career development, and financial rewards remain high, suggesting that these expectations are largely embedded within the generation. Moreover, Millennials’ expectations are significantly influenced by individual variables, careerism, and optimism.

Implications

This study suggests that managers need to focus their limited resources during times of recession on meeting Millennials’ high expectations regarding their development and careers. Because violating these high expectations can have detrimental effects on a number of outcomes, organizations are encouraged to discover creative and inexpensive ways to provide Millennials with meaningful work, plenty of learning opportunities and career development.

Originality/value

By comparing two matched samples of Millennials in two different situations, this study was able to disentangle generational, contextual, and individual influences on Millennials’ psychological contract expectations.

Keywords

Millennial generation Psychological contract Economic recession Optimism Careerism 

References

  1. Alsop, R. (2008). The trophy kids grow up: How the Millennial generation is shaking up the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N., & Thomas, H. D. C. (1996). Work group socialization. In M. A. West (Ed.), Hanbook of work groups (pp. 423–450). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vos, A., Buyens, D., & Schalk, R. (2003). Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 537–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vos, A., De Stobbeleir, K., & Meganck, A. (2009). The relationship between career-related antecedents and graduates’ anticipatory psychological contracts. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vos, A., & Meganck, A. (2009). What HR managers do versus what employees value: Exploring both parties’ view on retention management from a psychological contract perspective. Personnel Review, 38(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deal, J. J. (2007). Retiring the generation gap: How employees young and old can find common ground. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career. Is satisfied the new successful? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eichengreen, B., & O’Rourke, K. H. (2009). A tale of two depressions. (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  11. Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration employees: Strategies for effective management. Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Loughlin, C., & Barling, J. (2001). Young workers’ work values, attitudes, and behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work: Introduction and overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 857–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. OECD. (2009). Harmonised Unemployment Rates (HURs). OECD Updated, February 2009. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/24/42134775.pdf.
  16. Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntallanis, F. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rawlins, C., Indvik, J., & Johnson, P. R. (2008). Understanding the new generation: What the Millennial cohort absolutely, positively must have at work. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 12(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  18. Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behaviour: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 328–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rigotti, T. (2009). Enough is enough? Threshold models for the relationship between psychological contract breach and job-related attitudes. European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 18(4), 442–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson, S. L., & Morrisson, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rousseau, D. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rousseau, D. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sturges, J., & Guest, D. (2004). Working to live or living to work? Work/life balance early in the career. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sturges, J., Guest, D., Conway, N., & Davey, K. M. (2002). A longitudinal study of the relationship between career management and organizational commitment among graduates in the first ten years at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 731–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tomlinson, M. (2007). Graduate employability and student attitudes and orientations to the labour market. Journal of Education and Work, 20(4), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 862–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation. Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers, and Nexters in your workplace. New York, NY: Amacom.Google Scholar
  30. Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HRM Centre, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management SchoolGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations