Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 281–292 | Cite as

New Generation, Great Expectations: A Field Study of the Millennial Generation

  • Eddy S. W. Ng
  • Linda Schweitzer
  • Sean T. LyonsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the career expectations and priorities of members of the “millennial” generation (born in or after 1980) and explored differences among this cohort related to demographic factors (i.e., gender, race, and year of study) and academic performance.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were obtained from a national survey of millennial undergraduate university students from across Canada (N = 23,413). Data were analyzed using various multivariate techniques to assess the impacts of demographic variables and academic achievement on career expectations and priorities.

Findings

Millennials placed the greatest importance on individualistic aspects of a job. They had realistic expectations of their first job and salary but were seeking rapid advancement and the development of new skills, while also ensuring a meaningful and satisfying life outside of work. Our results suggest that Millennials’ expectations and values vary by gender, visible minority status, GPA, and year of study, but these variables explain only a small proportion of variance.

Implications

Changing North American demographics have created a crisis in organizations as they strive to recruit and retain the millennial generation, who purportedly hold values, attitudes, and expectations that are significantly different from those of the generations of workers that preceded them. A better understanding of the Millennials’ career expectations and priorities helps employers to create job offerings and work environments that are more likely to engage and retain millennial workers.

Originality/Value

This is a large-sample study that provides benchmark results for the millennial generation, which can be compared to results from other generational cohorts, and to millennial cohorts in the future as they progress through their life-cycle. This is one of the few studies that examines demographic heterogeneity within the millennial cohort.

Keywords

Canada Career expectations Millennial generation University students 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this manuscript is supported in part by a SSHRC grant to the research team. The authors would like to thank Brainstorm, DECODE, and Universum for making the data available to us. We also wish to thank Lisa Kuron for her invaluable contributions to the preparation and revision of this article.

References

  1. Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2002). The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why? American Economic Review, 92, 354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, R., Cosgrove, D., & Welsh, J. (1998). Chips & pop: Decoding the nexus generation. Toronto: Malcolm Lester Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bartol, K. M., & Martin, D. C. (1987). Managerial motivation among MBA students: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 1–12.Google Scholar
  4. Beal, F. M. (2008). Double Jeopardy: To be black and female. Meridiens, 8, 166–176.Google Scholar
  5. Berdahl, J., & Moore, C. (2006). Workplace harassment: Double jeopardy for minority women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 426–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., LePine, M. A., & Moynihan, L. S. (2003). Individual job-choice decisions and the impact of job attributes and recruitment practices: A longitudinal field study. Human Resource Management, 42, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, R. J., & Ng, E. (2006). The changing nature of work and organizations: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 891–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corporate Leadership Council. (2004). Generation X and Y employees. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board.Google Scholar
  10. Corporate Leadership Council. (2005). HR considerations for engaging Generation Y employees. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board.Google Scholar
  11. Crumpacker, M., & Crumpacker, J. M. (2007). Succession planning and generational stereotypes: Should HR consider age-values based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? Public Personnel Management, 36, 349–369.Google Scholar
  12. Dries, N., Peperman, E., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about careers: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 907–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Earl, J. K., & Bright, J. E. H. (2007). The relationship between career decision status and important work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Economist. (2009). Public-service careers: A tough search for talent. Retrieved November 6, 2009 from http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14753826.
  15. Erickson, T. J. (2009). Gen Y in the workforce: How I learned to love Millennials and stop worrying about what they are doing with their iPhones. Harvard Business Review, February 2009.Google Scholar
  16. Foot, D. K., & Stoffman, D. (1998). Boom Bust & Echo 2000: Profiting from the Demographic shift in the new millennium. Toronto: MW&R.Google Scholar
  17. Fortin, N. M., & Huberman, M. (2002). Occupational gender segregation and women’s wages in Canada: An historical perspective. Canadian Public Policy, 28, 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaudelli, J. (2009). The greenest generation: The truth behind millennials and the green movement. Advertising Age. Retrieved November 6, 2009 from http://adage.com/goodworks/post?article_id=136331.
  19. Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. P. (2008). Self-entitled college students: contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adoloescence, 37, 1193–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. W. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, R. P. (2002). Managing across generations in the 21st century: Important lessons from the ivory trenches. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnes, G. (2009). Occupation and the labour market participation of women: why do some people trade down jobs when careers are interrupted? Applied Economic Letters, 16, 1093–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kyle, C. (2009). Millenials know what they want. Saskatoon Star Phoenix. Retrieved May 9, 2009 from http://www.canada.com/Business/Millennials+know+what+they+want/1494997/story.html.
  24. Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  25. Leck, J. D. (2002). Making employment equity programs work for women. Canadian Public Policy, 28, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, J., & Jablin, F. M. (1992). A cross-cultural investigation of exit, voice, loyalty and neglect as responses to dissatisfying job conditions. Journal of Business Communication, 29, 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loughlin, C., & Barling, J. (2001). Young workers’ work values, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowe, D., Levitt, K. J., & Wilson, T. (2008). Solutions for retaining Generation Y employees in the workplace. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 3, 43–57.Google Scholar
  29. Lyons, S. (2003). An exploration of generational values in life and at work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  30. McClelland, D. C. (1965). Achievement motivation can be developed. Harvard Business Review, 43, 6–178.Google Scholar
  31. McDonald, K. S., & Hite, L. M. (2008). The next generation of career success: Implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 86–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McMahon, R. (2008). Millennials in the workplace. Retrieved November 6, 2009 from http://www.straight.com/article-130265/millennials-in-the-workplace.
  33. Moses, B. (1997). Career intelligence: Mastering the new work and personal realities. Toronto: Stoddard.Google Scholar
  34. Myers, J. (2007). The how and Y. Profit, October 2007.Google Scholar
  35. Ng, E.S.W., & Sears, G.J. What women and ethnic minorities want: Work values and labour market confidence. A self-determination perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. Pooley, E. (2005). Generation Y: How twenty somethings are changing the workplace. Canadian Business, June 6.Google Scholar
  37. Pooley, E. (2006). Hire Education. Canadian Business, September 11.Google Scholar
  38. PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2008). Millennials at work: Perspectives from a new generation. Retrieved July 17, 2009 from http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/forms/gxengallsmillennialsatworkperspectivesfromanewgeneration.jhtml.
  39. Roth, P. L., BeVier, C. A., Switzer, F. S., I. I. I., & Schippmann, J. S. (1996). Meta-analyzing the relationship between grades and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 548–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Somerville, K., & Walsworth, S. (2009). Vulnerabilities of highly skilled immigrants in Canada and the United States. American Review of Canadian Studies, 39, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spence, J. T., Pred, R. S., & Helmreich, R. L. (1989). Achievement strivings, scholastic aptitude, and academic performance: a follow-up to “impatience versus achievement strivings in the Type A pattern”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 176–178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Statistics Canada. (2007). Labour force projections for Canada, 2006–2031. Canadian Economic Observer, June 2007.Google Scholar
  43. Terjesen, S., Vinnicombe, S., & Freeman, C. (2007). Attracting Generation Y graduates: organisational attributes, likelihood to apply, and sex differences. Career Development International, 12, 504–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trunk, P. (2007). What Gen Y really wants. Time. Retrieved January 15, 2010 from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1640395,00.html.
  45. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer, F. S., I. I. I., & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitmarsh, L., Brown, D., Cooper, J., Hawkins-Rodgers, Y., & Keyser Wentworth, D. (2007). Choices and challenges: A qualitative exploration of professional women’s career patterns. Career Development Quarterly, 55, 225–236.Google Scholar
  49. Yang, S., & Guy, M. E. (2006). GenXers versus boomers: Work motivators and management implications. Public Performance and Management Review, 29, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, Xers and Nexters in your workplace. NY: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang, Y., Straub, C., & Kusyk, S. (2007). Making a life or making a living? Cross-cultural comparisons of business students’ work and life values in Canada and France. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 14, 174–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eddy S. W. Ng
    • 1
  • Linda Schweitzer
    • 2
  • Sean T. Lyons
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Business AdministrationCalifornia State Polytechnic UniversityPomonaUSA
  2. 2.Sprott School of BusinessCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.University of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations