Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 131–138 | Cite as

Organizational Support and Contract Fulfillment as Moderators of the Relationship Between Preferred Work Status and Performance




The purpose of this study was to examine organizational context variables as moderators of the relationship between preferred work status and job performance. The moderators were perceived organizational support (POS) and psychological contract fulfillment.


Survey data was collected from 164 participants working in a health and fitness organization. These participants ranged in age from 18 to 79 years old (M = 40, SD = 12.5) and held various positions including middle managers, clerical workers, maintenance workers, and sports trainers.


The relationship between preferred work status and extra-role performance was negative when POS was higher but not when POS was lower. Also, the relationship between preferred work status and extra-role performance was positive when contract fulfillment was lower but not when it was higher. No moderating effects were found when examining in-role performance.


Given the large and growing use of part-time workers it is important to understand differences across various subgroups of them in order to better inform human resource policies and practices. Specifically, the results highlight a key role for the management of reciprocity perceptions.


The literature on part-time workers suggests there are important differences between employees who work part-time because they prefer it and those who work part-time but prefer to work full-time. Research regarding the relationship between preferred work status and performance has produced mixed results. This study helps reconcile conflicting results regarding the relationship between preferred work status and performance by examining the moderating effects of theoretically relevant variables.


Organizational Citizenship Behavior Psychological Contract Perceive Organizational Support Human Resource Policy Fitness Organization 


  1. Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong-Stassen, M., Al-Ma’aitah, R., Cameron, S., & Horsburgh, M. (1998). The relationship between work status and the job attitudes of full-time and part-time Canadian and Jordanian nurses. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barling, J., & Gallagher, D. G. (1996). Part-time employment. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 241–277). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2006). Characteristics of the employed. Accessed 29 May, 2007 from
  7. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2002). Full-time versus part-time employees: Understanding the links between work status, the psychological contract, and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812–820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellingson, J. E., Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (1998). Factors related to the satisfaction and performance of temporary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 913–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman, D. (1990). Reconceptualizing the nature and consequences of part-time work. Academy of Management Review, 15, 103–112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gakovik, A., & Tetrick, L. (2003). Perceived organizational support and work status: A comparison of the employment relationships of part-time and full-time employees attending university classes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 649–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallagher, D. G. (2005). Part-time and contingent employment. In J. Barling, E. K. Kelloway, & M. R. Frone (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 517–541). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Greenhouse, S., & Barbaro, M. (2006). Wal-mart to add more part-timers and wage caps. The New York Times, 156, A1–A13.Google Scholar
  18. Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., & Tidd, S. T. (2002). The relationship between work status congruence and work-related attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 903–915.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 311–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackofsky, E. F., & Peters, L. H. (1987). Part-time versus full-time employment status differences: A replication and extension. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 8, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, T. W., & Johnson, D. R. (1991). The effects of work schedule and employment status on the organizational commitment and job satisfaction of full- versus part-time employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynch, P. D., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marchese, M. C., & Ryan, J. (2001). Capitalizing on the benefits of utilizing part-time employees through job autonomy. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, J. E., & Sinclair, R. R. (2007). A typology of the part-time workforce: Differences on job attitudes and turnover. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). The statistical difficulties in detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McGinnis, S. K., & Morrow, P. C. (1990). Job attitudes among full-and part-time employees. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, H. E., & Terborg, J. R. (1979). Job attitudes of part-time and full-time employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrison, E., & Robinson, S. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., & Elliott, S. M. (1994). The effect of preference for work-status, schedule, and shift on work-related attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 202–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
  34. Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pearce, J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1986). Employees’ responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1989). A second generation measure of organizational citizenship behavior. Working paper, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 525–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 774–780.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sinclair, R. R., Martin, J. E., & Michel, R. P. (1999). Full-time and part-time subgroup differences in job attitudes and demographic characteristics. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stamper, C. L., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: A field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 22, 517–536.Google Scholar
  43. Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract fulfillment on the performance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 692–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA
  2. 2.College of BusinessUniversity of Wisconsin OshkoshOshkoshUSA

Personalised recommendations