Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 145–153 | Cite as

Effects of Participation in Decision Making on Performance and Employee Attitudes: A Quality Circles Meta-analysis

Article

Abstract

This study explores the effects of a participative technique, quality circles (QCs), on several employee attitudes and performance. The sample included 36 studies with 42 independent samples. Mean effect sizes were small for employee attitudes and moderate for job performance suggesting QCs affected job performance to a greater degree than employee attitudes. For organizations involved in quality management these results seem to suggest that quality interventions have a stronger impact on job performance than on employee attitudes. The study conclusions provide a positive outlook on the effects of total quality management interventions on productivity.

Keywords

Quality circles Participation in decision making Meta-analysis Job performance Employee attitudes 

References

*References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.

  1. *Adam, E. E. (1991). Quality circle performance. Journal of Management, 17(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. *Atwater, L., & Sander, S. (1984). Quality circles in navy organizations: An evaluation (Technical Report No. NPRDC TR 8453). San Diego: Navy Personnel Research & Development Center. (NTIS No. AD-A146).Google Scholar
  3. Barrick, M. R., & Alexander, R. A. (1987). A review of quality circle efficacy and the existence of positive finding bias. Personnel Psychology, 40, 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockner, J., & Hess, T. (1986). Self-esteem and task performance in quality circles. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. *Bruning, N. S., & Liverpool, P. R. (1993). Membership in quality circles and participation in decision making. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. *Buch, K., & Raban, A. (1990). Quality circles: How effective are they improving employee performance and attitudes? Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 27, 11–17.Google Scholar
  7. *Buch, K., & Spangler, R. (1990). The effects of quality circles on performance and promotions. Human Relations, 43, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. *Byrd, P. A. (1986). An analysis of the impact of quality circles in an applied setting (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2854A.Google Scholar
  9. Cotton, J. L. (1993). Employee involvement: Methods for improving performance and work attitudes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Froggatt, K. L., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1988). Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13, 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  12. Crosby, P. B. (1984). Quality without tears: The art of hassle-free management. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  13. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.Google Scholar
  14. *Dutta, R. N. (1989). Relationships between participation in quality circles and employee attitudes in aerospace industries (Doctoral dissertation, United States International University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 1875A.Google Scholar
  15. *Elizur, D. (1990). Quality circles and quality of work life. International Journal of Manpower, 11(6), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. *Elmuti, D., & Kathawala, Y. (1990). Effects of computer aided quality circles on organizational productivity and satisfaction. Information & Management, 19, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eskew, D. M. (1989). The effect of quality circle participation on job involvement, productivity, and satisfaction. (Master’s thesis, Michigan State University, 1988). Masters Abstracts International, 27, 328.Google Scholar
  18. *Feagan, S. Y. (1986). Relationships of a quality circle process on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Virginia, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 359A.Google Scholar
  19. *Frost, T. F. (1986). The effects of quality circles upon job enrichment, teamwork, and stress. The Quality Circles Journal, 9(4), 42–45.Google Scholar
  20. Gallup survey: Top executives talk about quality. (1986). Quality Progress, 19(12), 49–54.Google Scholar
  21. *Gantos, L. A. (1987). Quality circles: An exploratory study of their efficacy for improving school decision structures (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 265A.Google Scholar
  22. *Grady, J. F. Jr. (1985). An investigation of the relationship between employee participation in quality circles and changes in their work life quality and productivity (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 989B.Google Scholar
  23. Gray, G. R. (1993). Quality circles: An update. S. A. M. Advanced Management Journal, 58(2), 41–47.Google Scholar
  24. Griffin, R. W., & Wayne, S. J. (1984). A field study of effective and less-effective quality circles. Academy of Management Proceedings, 217–221.Google Scholar
  25. *Ham, M. P., & McHenry, M. M. (1983). An examination of the effects of a quality circles program on attitudinal variables in two DoD installations. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar
  26. Harrington, H. J. (1987). The improvement process: How America’s leading companies improve quality. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  27. *Head, T. C., Molleston, J. L., Sorensen, P. F. Jr., & Gargano, J. (1986). The impact of implementing a quality circles intervention on employee task perceptions. Group & Organization Studies, 11, 360–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? The Japanese way (D. J. Lu, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. (Original work published 1981).Google Scholar
  30. Japhet-Michaeli, M. (1991). Participation in quality circles and high expectations: Impact on attitudes and output. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
  31. *Jennings, K. R. (1987). Exploring employee involvement: A longitudinal study of the process and outcomes of a quality circle intervention (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 172A.Google Scholar
  32. Jennings, K. R. (1988). Testing a model of quality circles processes: Implications for practice and consultation. Consultation, 7(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
  33. Lawler, E. E. III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E. Jr. (1998). Strategies for high performance organizations: The CEO report. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Ledford, G. E., Lawler, E. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (1988). The quality circle and its variations. In J. P. Campbell, & R. J. Campbell (Eds.), Productivity in organizations: New perspectives from industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 255–294). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Locke, E., & Schweiger, D. (1979). Participation in decision-making: One more look. In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. I, pp. 265–339). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  36. *Marks, M. L., Mirvis, P. H., Hackett, E. J., & Grady, J. F. Jr. (1986). Employee participation in a quality circle program: Impact on quality of work life, productivity, and absenteeism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, K. I., & Monge, R. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 727–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. *Miskin, V. D. (1986). Participation in successful quality circles and its relationship to leader behavior and employee job satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, 1985). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 3213A.Google Scholar
  39. Mobley, W. H., Horner, S. O., & Hollingsworth, A. T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 408–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. *Mucklow, N. E., & Seger, D. H. (1985). Cross-sectional study of the effects of quality circles on twelve attitudinal variables. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar
  41. *Nale, R. D. (1985). An investigation into the relationship between quality circles and employee attitudes (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Mississippi, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3692A.Google Scholar
  42. *Nottenburg, G. (1985). An investigation of individual reactions to quality circles: Findings from two firms (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 3650B.Google Scholar
  43. Park, S. J. (1990). A critical assessment of evaluative studies on quality circles change programs: Character, designs and outcomes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 1385A.Google Scholar
  44. Park, S. J. (1991). Estimating success rates of quality circle programs: Public and private experiences. Public Administration Quarterly, 15, 133–146.Google Scholar
  45. *Platten, P. E. (1984). The investigation of organizational commitment as a source of motivation in quality control circles (Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 708B.Google Scholar
  46. Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. *Rafaeli, A. (1985). Quality circles and employee attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 38, 603–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. *Schenkel, D. M. (1982). The effects of quality circle participation in a large complex organization: A field test. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  49. Scherkenbach, W. W. (1988). The Deming route to quality and productivity: Road maps and roadblocks. Rockville, MD: Mercury Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schmidt, F. L., Gast-Rosenberg, I., & Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization results for computer programmers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. *Shaw, L. L. (1988). The effects of quality circles on employee attitudes in a department of defense organization. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar
  52. *Shian, L. L. (1990). A study of the relationship of quality circles to job satisfaction, absenteeism and turnover of nurses and patients’ satisfaction with nursing care in Taiwan (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 2822B.Google Scholar
  53. *Shores, D. L. (1985). An exploratory study into the relationship between quality circles and job satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 2014A.Google Scholar
  54. Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39, 1005–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spector, P. E. (2006). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. *Steel, R. P., Jennings, K. R., & Lindsey, J. T. (1990). Quality circle problem solving and common cents: Evaluation study findings from a United States federal mint. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26, 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. *Steel, R. P., & Lloyd, R. F. (1988). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes of participation in quality circles: Conceptual and empirical findings. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 24, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. *Steel, R. P., Lloyd, R. F., Ovalle, N. K., & Hendrix, W. H. (1982). Designing quality circles research. The Quality Circles Journal, 5(1), 40–43.Google Scholar
  59. Steel, R. P., & Shane, G. S. (1986). Evaluation research on quality circles: Technical and analytical implications. Human Relations, 39, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. *Steel, R. P., Mento, A. J., Dilla, B. L., Ovalle, N. K. II, & Lloyd, R. F. (1985). Factors influencing success and failure of two circle programs. Journal of Management, 11(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tang, T. L. P., Tollison, P. S., & Whiteside, H. D. (1987). The effect of quality circle initiation on motivation to attend quality circle meetings and on task performance. Personnel Psychology, 40, 895–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. *Thal, A. E. Jr. (1985). Influence of quality circles on attitudinal outcomes among civil engineering personnel. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar
  63. Van Fleet, D. D., & Griffin, R. W. (1989). Quality circles: A review and suggested future directions. In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Richardson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 213–233). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  64. *Vaughn, R. J. (1983). The effects of a quality circle intervention on four behavioral outcomes. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.Google Scholar
  65. *Weiglein, S. A. (1989). Relationship of quality circles in nursing to leadership, job satisfaction, patient care, and cost containment (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 4239B.Google Scholar
  66. *Wiebe, F. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1985). A longitudinal study of the impact of quality circles. Transactions IAQC Annual Conference, 7, 175–177.Google Scholar
  67. *Zahra, S. A. (1982). An exploratory empirical assessment of quality circles (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Mississippi, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 2030A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business, LCC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Houston-Clear LakeHoustonUSA
  2. 2.University of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations