Advertisement

Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 99–109 | Cite as

Personality and Intelligence in Business People: A Study of Two Personality and Two Intelligence Measures

  • Adrian FurnhamEmail author
  • Georgia Dissou
  • Peter Sloan
  • Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
Article

Abstract

This study examined the overlap and correlations among two well-known personality measures (NEO-PI–R; Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, MBTI) and two widely used intelligence tests (the Graduate Management Assessment (GMA), Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA)). The GMA measures both fluid intelligence (Gf) and crystallized intelligence (Gc), whereas WGCTA mainly assess Gc. A total of over 3,500 participants completed the four measures in a middle management assessment event. Correlational analysis showed that Extraversion on the MBTI tended to be associated with Openness and Stability on the NEO. Intuition was associated with Openness and Introversion. Feeling types tended to be both Agreeable and Neurotic while perceiving types were high on Openness but low on Agreeableness. The NEO Big Five factor of Openness was most consistently and significantly associated with both measures of intelligence (r = .09 to r =.12). Results from the MBTI showed that Intuition and Perceiving scores were positively and significantly associated with both intelligence test scores which were intercorrelated (r = .38). Regressional analysis showed that personality traits are logically and coherently related to intelligence test scores. Implications for selection and assessment are considered.

Keywords

Personality Intelligence Job performance Personnel selection 

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L. (1996a). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, P. L. (1996b). Intelligence as process and knowledge: An integration for adult development and application. In W. Rogers & A. Fisk (Eds.), Aging and skilled performance: Advances in theory and applications (pp. 139–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlhaum.Google Scholar
  3. Ackerman, P. L. (1999). Traits and knowledge as determinants of learning and individual differences: Putting it all together. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, et al. (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 437–462). Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ackerman, P. L., & Goff, M. (1994). Typical intellectual engagement and personality: Reply to Rocklin (1994). Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 150–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ackerman, P. L., & Rolfus, E. (1999). The locus of adult intelligence. Psychology and Aging, 14, 314–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anthony, W. (1973). The development of extraversion, of ability, and of relation between them. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 223–227.Google Scholar
  7. Bayne, R. (2003). Love, money and studying. The Psychologist, 16, 529–531.Google Scholar
  8. Bertua, C., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. (2005). The predictive validity of cognitive ability tests: A UK meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 78, 287–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blinkhorn, S. (1985). Graduate and managerial assessment manual and user guide. Dorchester: Dorset.Google Scholar
  10. Blinkhorn, S., & Johnson, C. (1990). The insignificance of personality testing. Nature, 348, 671–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  12. Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003a). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal studies British university students. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chamorro- Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003b). Personality traits and academic exam performance. European Journal of Personality, 17, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2004). A possible model for understanding the personality-intelligence interface. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 249–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2005). Intellectual competence. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2006). Intellectual competence and the intelligent personality: a third way in differential psychology. Review of General Psychology, 10, 251–267.Google Scholar
  18. Clark, L., & Watson, D. (1999). Personality, disorder and personality disorder: Towards a more rational conceptualisation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 13, 142–151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cook, M. (2004). Personnel selection. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Costa, P. (1996). Work and personality: Use of the NEO-PI-R in industrial/organizational psychology. Applied Psychology, 45, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.Google Scholar
  22. Davito, A. (1985). A review of the MBTI. In J. Mitchell (Ed.), North Mental Measurement Yearbook.Google Scholar
  23. Dobson, P. (2000). An introduction into the relationship between neuroticism, extraversion and cognitive test performance in selection. Applied Psychology, 45, 225–241.Google Scholar
  24. Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
  25. Drasgow F. (2003). Intelligence and the workplace. In W. Borman, R. Ilgen & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, (Vol.12, pp. 107–129). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  27. Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Furnham, A. (2002). Personality at work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Furnham, A. (2004) Personality and organisation: European perspectives on personality assessment in organisations. In B. Schneider & D. Smith (Eds.), Personality and organisations (pp. 25–59). Mahwah, NJ.: LEA.Google Scholar
  30. Furnham, A. (2006). The personality disorders and intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 943–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Furnham, A., & Medhurst, S. (1995). Personality correlates of academic seminar behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. (1993) Personality and work-performance: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator correlates of managerial perfromance in two cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The relationship between the revised NEO––personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behaviour and Personality, 31, 577–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Paltiel, L. (2005). Intelligence in relation to Jung’s personality types. Individual Difference Research, 3, 2–13.Google Scholar
  36. Goff, M., & Ackerman, P. (1992). Personality-intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gottfredson, L. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 70–132.Google Scholar
  38. Heim, A. (1965). Tests AHS. London: NFER.Google Scholar
  39. Huntz, E., & Donovan, J. (2000). Personality and job performance. The big five resulted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Judge, T., Heller, D., & Mount, T. (2002). Five factor model of personality and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Judge, T., Martcchto, J., & Thoresen, C. (1997). Five-factor model of personality and employee absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Judge, T., Higgins, C., Thorensen, C., & Barrick, M. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general metal ability and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 621–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jung, C. (1971). Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kaufman, A., McLean, J., & Lincoln, A. (1996). The relationship of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to IQ level and the fluid and crystallized IQ discrepancy on the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT). Assessment, 3, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matthews, G. (1999). Personality and skill: a cognitive-adaptive framework. In P. Ackerman, P. Kyllonen & R. Roberts (Eds.), The future of learning and individual difference research (pp. 251–270). Washingthon DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matthews, G., Deary, I., & Whiteman, M. (2003). Personality traits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDonald, D., Anderson, P., Tsagarakis, C., & Holland, J. (1994). Examination of the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 74, 339–344.Google Scholar
  49. Millon, T. (1981). Disorders of personality DSM-III: Axis II. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  50. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2002). Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: A study using the NEO-personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. European Journal of Personality, 17, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2004). Why is concientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1013–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2005). Can personality factors predict intelligence? Personality and Individual Difference, 38, 1021–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Tsaousis, I. (2006). Is the relationship between intelligence and trait Neuroticism mediated by test anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murphy, K. (2002). Can conflicting perspectives on the role of g in personnel selection be resolved. Human Performance, 15, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers, I., & McCalley, M. (1975). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  56. Nyhus, E., & Pons, E. (2005). The effect of personality on earnings. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rice, G., & Lindecamp, D. (1989). Personality types and business success of small retailers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 177–182.Google Scholar
  58. Salgado, J. (1997). The Five model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt, F. (2002). The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance, 15, 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work. Journal of Applied Psychology., 86, 162–173.Google Scholar
  62. Stankov, L. (2000). Complexity, metacognition, and fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stankov, L., Boyle, G. J., & Cattell, R. B. (1995). Models and paradigns in personality, intelligence research. In D. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International Handbook of personality and intelligence. Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 15–43). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  64. Van der Berg, T., & Feij, J. (1993). Personality traits and job characteristics as predictors of job experiences. European Journal of Personality, 7, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watson, G. & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal manual. The Psychological Corporation/Marcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  66. Watson, G., & Glaser, E. (1994) Watson-Glaser Cortical Thinking Appraisal ––Form S (WGCTA). Washington: Psychological Corportation.Google Scholar
  67. Wolf, M., & Ackerman, P. (2005). Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytical investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 581–610). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business, LCC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Furnham
    • 1
    Email author
  • Georgia Dissou
    • 1
  • Peter Sloan
    • 2
  • Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Kaisen Consulting LimitedBristol, LondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations