Advertisement

Working memory moderates the association between condom use intentions and behavior among moderate-to-heavy drinking men who have sex with men

  • K. D. TahaneyEmail author
  • T. P. Palfai
  • P. Luehring-Jones
  • S. A. Maisto
  • J. S. Simons
Brief Report
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are a high-risk population for HIV infection and this risk is increased for those who consume alcohol. Condomless anal intercourse (CAI) is the central transmission risk factor for this population. This study examined whether individual differences in working memory moderated the association between intentions to use condoms and the frequency of CAI among MSM who engaged in anal intercourse over a subsequent 6-week period. Moderate- and heavy-drinking MSM (n = 207) completed questionnaires regarding alcohol use and condom use intentions and an operation span task to assess working memory at baseline. Participants then completed 6 weeks of morning surveys via a mobile phone app to assess anal intercourse frequency with and without condoms. Negative binomial regression analyses showed that the association between intentions to use condoms and episodes of CAI during the monitoring period was moderated by working memory such that intentions predicted CAI for those high in working memory but not those low in working memory. These results support the view that self-reported intentions may be less-likely to translate into health behaviors among those with poorer executive functioning skills.

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institute of Health under the award number R01AA022301.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Kelli Tahaney, Tibor Palfai, Peter Luehring-Jones, Stephen Maisto, and Jeffrey Simons declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albarracín, D., Durantini, M. R., & Earl, A. (2006). Empirical and theoretical conclusions of an analysis of outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan, J. L., Johnston, M., & Campbell, N. (2011). Missed by an inch or a mile? Predicting the size of intention—behavior gap from measures of executive control. Psychology & Health, 26, 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew, B. J., Mullan, B. A., de Wit, J. B., Monds, L. A., Todd, J., & Kothe, E. J. (2016). Does the theory of planned behaviour explain condom use behaviour among men who have sex with men? A meta-analytic review of the literature. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 2834–2844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, L. F., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickel, W. K., Yi, R., Landes, R. D., Hill, P. F., & Baxter, C. (2011). Remember the future: Working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biological Psychiatry, 69, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahalan, D., Cisin, I. H., & Crossley, H. M. (1969). American drinking practices: A national study of drinking behavior and attitudes. Monographs of the Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, 6, 260.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, M. L. (2010). Toward a person × situation model of sexual risk-taking behaviors: Illuminating the conditional effects of traits across sexual situations and relationship contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finn, P. R., Justus, A., Mazas, C., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1999). Working memory, executive processes and the effects of alcohol on Go/No-Go learning: Testing a model of behavioral regulation and impulsivity. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 146, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (2002). The information-motivation-behavioral skills model. Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health, 1, 40–70.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, J. D., Fisher, W. A., Bryan, A. D., & Misovich, S. J. (2002). Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner-city high school youth. Health Psychology, 21, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A metaanalysis of effects and processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 69–119). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, J. A. (1982). Précis of The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirsh, J. B., Galinsky, A. D., & Zhong, C. B. (2011). Drunk, powerful, and in the dark: How general processes of disinhibition produce both prosocial and antisocial behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012a). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Wiers, R. W. (2008a). Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: A theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychology Review, 2, 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Friese, M., Wiers, R. W., & Schmitt, M. (2008b). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012b). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogarth, L., Attwood, A. S., Bate, H. A., & Munafò, M. R. (2012). Acute alcohol impairs human goal-directed action. Biological Psychology, 90, 154–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houben, K., Dassen, F. C., & Jansen, A. (2016). Taking control: Working memory training in overweight individuals increases self-regulation of food intake. Appetite, 105, 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houben, K., Wiers, R. W., & Jansen, A. (2011). Getting a grip on drinking behavior: Training working memory to reduce alcohol abuse. Psychological Science, 22, 968–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koblin, B. A., Husnik, M. J., Colfax, G., Huang, Y., Madison, M., Mayer, K., et al. (2006). Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men. Aids, 20, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maisto, S. A., Palfai, T., Vanable, P. A., Heath, J., & Woolf-King, S. E. (2012). The effects of alcohol and sexual arousal on determinants of sexual risk in men who have sex with men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 971–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maisto, S. A., & Simons, J. S. (2016). Research on the effects of alcohol and sexual arousal on sexual risk in men who have sex with men: Implications for HIV prevention interventions. AIDS and Behavior, 20, 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marteau, T. M., Hollands, G. J., & Fletcher, P. C. (2012). Changing human behavior to prevent disease: The importance of targeting automatic processes. Science, 337, 1492–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5, 97–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McFarland, W., Chen, Y. H., Nguyen, B., Grasso, M., Levine, D., Stall, R., et al. (2012). Behavior, intention or chance? A longitudinal study of HIV seroadaptive behaviors, abstinence and condom use. AIDS and Behavior, 16, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montanaro, E. A., & Bryan, A. D. (2014). Comparing theory-based condom interventions: Health belief model versus theory of planned behavior. Health Psychology, 33, 1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shuper, P. A., Joharchi, N., Monti, P. M., Loutfy, M., & Rehm, J. (2017). Acute alcohol consumption directly increases HIV transmission risk: A randomized controlled experiment. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 76(5), 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teng, Y., & Mak, W. W. (2011). The role of planning and self-efficacy in condom use among men who have sex with men: An application of the health action process approach model. Health Psychology, 30, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wray, T. B., Celio, M. A., Pérez, A. E., DiGuiseppi, G. T., Carr, D. J., Woods, L. A., & Monti, P. M. (2019). Causal effects of alcohol intoxication on sexual risk intentions and condom negotiation skills among high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS and Behavior, 23(1), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA

Personalised recommendations