Advertisement

Social support buffers the negative effects of stress in cardiac patients: a cross-sectional study with acute coronary syndrome patients

  • Simona Wiesmaierova
  • Dafina Petrova
  • Antonio Arrebola Moreno
  • Andrés Catena
  • José Antonio Ramírez Hernández
  • Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Article

Abstract

Cardiac patients who have social support generally have better prognosis than patients who lack social support. Several theoretical mechanisms have been proposed to explain this protective effect, including the capacity of social support to buffer the negative effects of stress. We tested this buffering effect in a study of patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Spain. Several days after the cardiac event patients answered a questionnaire measuring stressful events during their lifetime, perceived social support around the time of the cardiac event, and depression symptoms in the past week. Results showed that stressful life events were related to depressive symptoms and worse renal function post-ACS only among patients with low perceived social support. Among patients who reported enough social support, lifetime stress was not related to depressive symptoms. No similar effects were observed on other prognostic indicators such as troponin levels or the number of obstructed arteries. These results suggest that social support can buffer the negative effects of stress on the mental and physical well-being of cardiac patients.

Keywords

Social support Mental health Stress Depression Cardiovascular disease 

Notes

Funding

This research is part of the self-funded project “PySCA: Study on the impact of psychological factors in acute coronary syndrome” (Principal Investigator: JARH). Dafina Petrova is supported by a Juan de la Cierva Fellowship (FJCI-2016-28279) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness. Financial support was partially provided by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain) (PSI2011-22954 and PSI2014-51842-R).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Simona Wiesmaierova, Dafina Petrova, Antonio Arrebola Moreno, Andrés Catena, José Antonio Ramírez Hernández and Rocio Garcia-Retamero declare independence from the funding agencies and do not have conflicts of interest including financial interests, activities, relationships, and affiliations.

Ethical approval

The Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves in Granada, Spain, provided approval for the study.

Human and animal rights and Informed consent

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Al Suwaidi, J., Reddan, D. N., Williams, K., Pieper, K. S., Harrington, R. A., Califf, R. M., et al. (2002). Prognostic implications of abnormalities in renal function in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation, 106, 974–980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anavekar, N. S., McMurray, J. J., Velazquez, E. J., Solomon, S. D., Kober, L., Rouleau, J. L., et al. (2004). Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 1285–1295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth, J., Schneider, S., & von Kanel, R. (2010). Lack of social support in the etiology and the prognosis of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 72, 229–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, 78, 490–498.Google Scholar
  5. Berkman, L. F., Blumenthal, J., Burg, M., Carney, R. M., Catellier, D., Cowan, M. J., et al. (2003). Effects of treating depression and low perceived social support on clinical events after myocardial infarction: The enhancing recovery in coronary heart disease patients (ENRICHD) randomized trial. JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 3106–3116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blasco-Fontecilla, H., Delgado-Gomez, D., Legido-Gil, T., De Leon, J., Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., & Baca-Garcia, E. (2012). Can the Holmes–Rahe social readjustment rating scale (SRRS) be used as a suicide risk scale? An exploratory study. Archives of Suicide Research, 16, 13–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borghi, C., Rosei, E. A., Bardin, T., Dawson, J., Dominiczak, A., Kielstein, J. T., et al. (2015). Serum uric acid and the risk of cardiovascular and renal disease. Journal of Hypertension, 33, 1729–1741.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cukor, D., Peterson, R. A., Cohen, S. D., & Kimmel, P. L. (2006). Depression in end-stage renal disease hemodialysis patients. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 2, 678–687.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenberger, N. I., Taylor, S. E., Gable, S. L., Hilmert, C. J., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. NeuroImage, 35, 1601–1612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Fallon, M. (2011). Depression in end-stage renal disease. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 49, 30–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez, A., Garcia-Alonso, J., Royo-Pastor, C., Garrell-Corbera, I., Rengel-Chica, J., Agudo-Ugena, J., et al. (2015). Effects of the economic crisis and social support on health-related quality of life: First wave of a longitudinal study in Spain. The British Journal of General Practice: The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 65, e198–e203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fontana, A. F., Kerns, R. D., Rosenberg, R. L., & Colonese, K. L. (1989). Support, stress, and recovery from coronary heart disease: A longitudinal causal model. Health Psychology, 8, 175–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Frasure-Smith, N., Lesperance, F., Gravel, G., Masson, A., Juneau, M., Talajic, M., et al. (2000). Social support, depression, and mortality during the first year after myocardial infarction. Circulation, 101, 1919–1924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallant, M. P. (2013). Social networks, social support, and health-related behavior. In L. R. Martin & M. R. DiMatteo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of health communication, behavior change, and treatment adherence (pp. 305–322). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia-Retamero, R., Petrova, D., Arrebola-Moreno, A., Catena, A., & Ramírez-Hernández, J. A. (2016). Type D personality is related to severity of acute coronary syndrome in patients with recurrent cardiovascular disease. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 111–119.Google Scholar
  17. Greenwood, D. C., Muir, K. R., Packham, C. J., & Madeley, R. J. (1996). Coronary heart disease: A review of the role of psychosocial stress and social support. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 18, 221–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamm, C. W., Bassand, J. P., Agewall, S., Bax, J., Boersma, E., Bueno, H., et al. (2011). ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal, 32, 2999–3054.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 1–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hogan, B. E., Linden, W., & Najarian, B. (2002). Social support interventions: Do they work? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 381–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS medicine, 7, e1000316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lakey, B., & Orehek, E. (2011). Relational regulation theory: A new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. Psychological Review, 118, 482–495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leifheit-Limson, E. C., Reid, K. J., Kasl, S. V., Lin, H., Buchanan, D. M., Jones, P. G., et al. (2012). Changes in social support within the early recovery period and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73, 35–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. León-Pérez, G., Wallston, K. A., Goggins, K. M., Poppendeck, H. M., & Kripalani, S. (2016). Effects of stress, health competence, and social support on depressive symptoms after cardiac hospitalization. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 39, 441–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lett, H. S., Blumenthal, J. A., Babyak, M. A., Strauman, T. J., Robins, C., & Sherwood, A. (2005). Social support and coronary heart disease: Epidemiologic evidence and implications for treatment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 869–878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell, P. H., Powell, L., Blumenthal, J., Norten, J., Ironson, G., Pitula, C. R., et al. (2003). A short social support measure for patients recovering from myocardial infarction: The ENRICHD social support inventory. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 23, 398–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Motrico, E., Rodero-Cosano, M. L., Álvarez-Gálvez, J., Salinas-Pérez, J. A., & Moreno-Peral, P. (2017). Instrumentos de evaluación de los eventos vitales estresantes en población española adulta: Una revisión sistemática. Anales De Psicología, 33, 556–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Neil, A. (2013). The relationship between coronary heart disease (CHD) and major depressive disorder (MDD): Key mechanisms and the role of quality of life. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orvin, K., Eisen, A., Goldenberg, I., Farkash, A., Shlomo, N., Gevrielov-Yusim, N., et al. (2015). The proxy of renal function that most accurately predicts short-and long-term outcome after acute coronary syndrome. American Heart Journal, 169, 702–712.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Park, H. W., Yoon, C. H., Kang, S. H., Choi, D. J., Kim, H. S., Cho, M. C., et al. (2013). Early-and late-term clinical outcome and their predictors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. International Journal of Cardiology, 169, 254–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Perk, J., De Backer, G., Gohlke, H., Graham, I., Reiner, Z., Verschuren, M., et al. (2012). European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). European Heart Journal, 33, 1635–1701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodrigues, M. M. S., Gierveld, J. D. J., & Buz, J. (2014). Loneliness and the exchange of social support among older adults in Spain and the Netherlands. Ageing & Society, 34, 330–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosengren, A., Hawken, S., Ounpuu, S., Sliwa, K., Zubaid, M., Almahmeed, W. A., et al. (2004). Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11 119 cases and 13 648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. The Lancet, 364, 953–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sandín, B. (2003). El estrés: Un análisis basado en el papel de los factores sociales [Stress: An analysis based on social factors]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3, 141–157.Google Scholar
  38. Sanz, J., García-Vera, M. P., Espinosa, R., Fortún, M., & Vázquez, C. (2005). Adaptación española del inventario para la depresión de beck-II (BDI-II): 3. propiedades psicométricas en pacientes con trastornos psicológicos. Clínica y Salud, 16, 121–142.Google Scholar
  39. Seery, M. D., Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. (2010). Whatever does not kill us: Cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability, and resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1025–1041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg, P. G., James, S. K., Atar, D., Badano, L. P., Blömstrom-Lundqvist, C., et al. (2012). ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal, 33, 2569–2619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tawakol, A., Ishai, A., Takx, R. A., Figueroa, A. L., Ali, A., Kaiser, Y., et al. (2017). Relation between resting amygdalar activity and cardiovascular events: A longitudinal and cohort study. The Lancet, 389, 834–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, S. E. (2011). Social support: A review. In H. Friedman (Ed.), Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Thygesen, K., Alpert, J. S., Jaffe, A. S., Simoons, M. L., Chaitman, B. R., White, H. D., et al. (2012). Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60, 1581–1598.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomfohr, L. M., Edwards, K. M., Madsen, J. W., & Mills, P. J. (2015). Social support moderates the relationship between sleep and inflammation in a population at high risk for developing cardiovascular disease. Psychophysiology, 52, 1689–1697.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Uchino, B. N. (2006). Social support and health: A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 377–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Uchino, B. N. (2009). Understanding the links between social support and physical health: A life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 236–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Uchino, B. N., Bowen, K., Carlisle, M., & Birmingham, W. (2012). Psychological pathways linking social support to health outcomes: A visit with the “ghosts” of research past, present, and future. Social Science and Medicine, 74, 949–957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Vaglio, J., Conard, M., Poston, W. S., O’Keefe, J., Haddock, C. K., House, J., et al. (2004). Testing the performance of the ENRICHD social support instrument in cardiac patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. van Melle, J. P., de Jonge, P., Spijkerman, T. A., Tijssen, J. G., Ormel, J., van Veldhuisen, D. J., et al. (2004). Prognostic association of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 814–822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, H., Mittleman, M. A., & Orth-Gomer, K. (2005). Influence of social support on progression of coronary artery disease in women. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 599–607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wills, T. A., & Ainette, M. G. (2012). Social networks and social support. In A. Baum, A. Revenson, & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 465–492). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research CenterUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Escuela Andaluza de Salud PúblicaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADAUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  4. 4.CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
  5. 5.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  6. 6.Cardiology DepartmentUniversity Hospital Virgen de las NievesGranadaSpain
  7. 7.Harding Center for Risk LiteracyMax Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations