Can the artificial intelligence technique of reinforcement learning use continuously-monitored digital data to optimize treatment for weight loss?
- 113 Downloads
Behavioral weight loss (WL) trials show that, on average, participants regain lost weight unless provided long-term, intensive—and thus costly—intervention. Optimization solutions have shown mixed success. The artificial intelligence principle of “reinforcement learning” (RL) offers a new and more sophisticated form of optimization in which the intensity of each individual’s intervention is continuously adjusted depending on patterns of response. In this pilot, we evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a RL-based WL intervention, and whether optimization would achieve equivalent benefit at a reduced cost compared to a non-optimized intensive intervention. Participants (n = 52) completed a 1-month, group-based in-person behavioral WL intervention and then (in Phase II) were randomly assigned to receive 3 months of twice-weekly remote interventions that were non-optimized (NO; 10-min phone calls) or optimized (a combination of phone calls, text exchanges, and automated messages selected by an algorithm). The Individually-Optimized (IO) and Group-Optimized (GO) algorithms selected interventions based on past performance of each intervention for each participant, and for each group member that fit into a fixed amount of time (e.g., 1 h), respectively. Results indicated that the system was feasible to deploy and acceptable to participants and coaches. As hypothesized, we were able to achieve equivalent Phase II weight losses (NO = 4.42%, IO = 4.56%, GO = 4.39%) at roughly one-third the cost (1.73 and 1.77 coaching hours/participant for IO and GO, versus 4.38 for NO), indicating strong promise for a RL system approach to weight loss and maintenance.
KeywordsArtificial intelligence Behavioral treatment Lifestyle modification Weight loss Obesity Optimization
This project was funded by a Drexel University DARE (Drexel Areas of Research Excellence) Award to Evan Forman. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Pedrag Krasnja whom we consulted during the planning of this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Evan M. Forman, Stephanie G. Kerrigan, Meghan L. Butryn, Adrienne S. Juarascio, Stephanie M. Manasse, Santiago Ontañón, Diane H. Dallal, Rebecca J. Crochiere and Danielle Moskow declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights and Informed consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abbeel, P., & Ng, A. Y. (2004). Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning.Google Scholar
- Association of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. (2018). Find a CBT Therapist. Retrieved May 23, 2018, from http://www.findcbt.org.
- Butryn, M. L., Zhang, F., Remmert, J. E., Roberts, S. R., & Forman, E. M. (2018). Baseline Executive Functioning Predicts Weight Loss and Physical Activity Outcomes in A Lifestyle Modification Program. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting and Scientific Sessions of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2014). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD. Retrieved May 13, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/obesity-overweight.htm.
- Kuderer, M., Gulati, S., & Burgard, W. (2015). Learning driving styles for autonomous vehicles from demonstration. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).Google Scholar
- McGraa, K. L. K. (2010). The effects of persuasive motivational text messaging on adherence to diet and exercise programs across different personality traits. Santa Barbara: Fielding Graduate University.Google Scholar
- Ontanón, S. (2013). The combinatorial multi-armed bandit problem and its application to real-time strategy games. Paper presented at the Ninth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference.Google Scholar
- Paredes, P., Gilad-Bachrach, R., Czerwinski, M., Roseway, A., Rowan, K., & Hernandez, J. (2014). PopTherapy: Coping with stress through pop-culture. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.Google Scholar
- Phatak, S. S., Freigoun, M. T., Martín, C. A., Rivera, D. E., Korinek, E. V., Adams, M. A., et al. (2018). Modeling individual differences: A case study of the application of system identification for personalizing a physical activity intervention. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 79, 82–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piette, J. D., Farris, K. B., Newman, S., An, L., Sussman, J., & Singh, S. (2014). The potential impact of intelligent systems for mobile health self-management support: Monte Carlo simulations of text message support for medication adherence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49, 84–94.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Piette, J. D., Krein, S. L., Striplin, D., Marinec, N., Kerns, R. D., Farris, K. B., et al. (2016). Patient-centered pain care using artificial intelligence and mobile health tools: Protocol for a randomized study funded by the US Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Program. JMIR Research Protocols, 5, e53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Poirier, J., Bennett, W. L., Jerome, G. J., Shah, N. G., Lazo, M., Yeh, H.-C., et al. (2016). Effectiveness of an activity tracker-and internet-based adaptive walking program for adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rabbi, M., Aung, M. H., Zhang, M., & Choudhury, T. (2015). MyBehavior: Automatic personalized health feedback from user behaviors and preferences using smartphones. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.Google Scholar
- Society of Clinical Psychology. (2018). Therapists Near Me. Retrieved May 23, 2018, from https://www.div12.org/therapist-search/.
- Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT press Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Wilson, G. T., & Brownell, K. D. (2002). Behavioral treatment for obesity. In C. G. Fairburn & K. D. Brownell (Eds.), Eating disorders and obesity. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Zhou, M., Fukuoka, Y., Mintz, Y., Goldberg, K., Kaminsky, P., Flowers, E., et al. (2018). Evaluating machine learning-based automated personalized daily step goals delivered through a Mobile Phone App: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6, e28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar